scholarly journals Single-molecule dynamics and genome-wide transcriptomics reveal that NF-κB (p65)-DNA binding times can be decoupled from transcriptional activation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Callegari ◽  
Christian Sieben ◽  
Alexander Benke ◽  
David M. Suter ◽  
Beat Fierz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Protein Interaction ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Binding Time ◽  
Transcriptional Output

AbstractTranscription factors (TFs) regulate gene expression in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes by recognizing and binding to specific DNA promoter sequences. In higher eukaryotes, it remains unclear how the duration of TF binding to DNA relates to downstream transcriptional output. Here, we address this question for the transcriptional activator NF-κB (p65), by live-cell single molecule imaging of TF-DNA binding kinetics and genome-wide quantification of p65-mediated transcription. We used mutants of p65, perturbing either the DNA binding domain (DBD) or the protein-protein transactivation domain (TAD). We found that p65-DNA binding time was predominantly determined by its DBD and directly correlated with its transcriptional output as long as the TAD is intact. Surprisingly, mutation or deletion of the TAD did not modify p65-DNA binding stability, suggesting that the p65 TAD generally contributes neither to the assembly of an “enhanceosome,” nor to the active removal of p65 from putative specific binding sites. However, TAD removal did reduce p65-mediated transcriptional activation, indicating that protein-protein interactions act to translate the long-lived p65-DNA binding into productive transcription.Author SummaryTo control transcription of a certain gene or a group of genes, both eukaryotes and prokaryotes express specialized proteins, transcription factors (TFs). During gene activation, TFs bind gene promotor sequences to recruit the transcriptional machinery including DNA polymerase II. TFs are often multi-subunit proteins containing a DNA-binding domain (DBD) as well as a protein-protein interaction interface. It was suggested that the duration of a TF-DNA binding event 1) depends on these two subunits and 2) dictates the outcome, i.e. the amount of mRNA produced from an activated gene. We set out to address these hypotheses using the transcriptional activator NF-κB (p65) as well as a number of mutants affecting different functional subunits. Using a combination of live-cell microscopy and RNA sequencing, we show that p65 DNA-binding time indeed correlates with the transcriptional output, but that this relationship depends on, and hence can be uncoupled by altering, the protein-protein interaction capacity. Our results suggest that, while p65 DNA binding times are dominated by the DBD, a transcriptional output can only be achieved with a functional protein-protein interaction subunit.

scholarly journals Dynamic evolution of the major transcription factor DNA binding domain, and protein-protein interaction families during the evolution of the avian lineage

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allie M. Graham ◽  
Jason S. Presnell
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Protein Interaction ◽  
Phenotypic Diversity ◽  
Domain Architecture ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Interaction Domain ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction

ABSTRACTTranscription factors are characterized by their domain architecture, including DNA binding and protein-protein interaction domain combinations, which regulate their binding specificity, as well as their ability to effect a change on gene expression of their downstream targets. Transcription factors are central to organismal development, thus they potentially are instrumental in producing phenotypic diversity. Transcription factor abundance was estimated via 49 major DNA binding domain families, as well as 34 protein-protein interaction domain families, in 48 bird genomes, which were then compared with 6 available reptile genomes, in an effort to assess the degree to which these domains are potentially connected to increased phenotypic diversity in the avian lineage. We hypothesized that there would be increased abundance in multiple transcription factor domain families, as well as domains associated with protein-protein interactions, that would correlate with the increased phenotypic diversity found in birds; instead, this data shows a general loss/contraction of major domain families, with the largest losses in domain families associated with multiple developmental (feather, body-plan, immune) and metabolic processes. Ultimately, the results of this analyses represent a general characterization of domain family composition in birds, thus the specific domain composition of TF families should be probed further, especially those with the largest reductions seen in this study.

scholarly journals Homotypic interactions of chicken GATA-1 can mediate transcriptional activation.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 1353-1363 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Y Yang ◽  
T Evans
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Protein Dimerization ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Functional Consequences ◽  
Homotypic Interactions

We used a one-hybrid system to replace precisely the finger II chicken GATA-1 DNA-binding domain with the binding domain of bacterial repressor protein LexA. The LexA DNA-binding domain lacks amino acids that function for transcriptional activation, nuclear localization, or protein dimerization. This allowed us to analyze activities of GATA-1 sequences distinct from DNA binding. We found that strong transcriptional activating sequences that function independently of finger II are present in GATA-1. Sequences including finger I contain an independent nuclear localizing function. Our data are consistent with cooperative binding of two LexA-GATA-1 hybrid proteins on a palindromic operator. The sensitivity of our transcription assay provides the first evidence that GATA-1 can make homotypic interactions in vivo. The ability of a non-DNA-binding form of GATA-1 to activate gene expression by targeting to a bound GATA-1 derivative further supports the notion that GATA-1-GATA-1 interactions may have functional consequences. A coimmunoprecipitation assay was used to demonstrate that GATA-1 multimeric complexes form in solution by protein-protein interaction. The novel ability of GATA-1 to interact homotypically may be important for the formation of higher-order structures among distant regulatory elements that share binding sites for this transcription factor. We also used the system to test the ability of GATA-1 to interact heterotypically with other activators.

scholarly journals Single-molecule dynamics and genome-wide transcriptomics reveal that NF-kB (p65)-DNA binding times can be decoupled from transcriptional activation

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. e1007891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Callegari ◽  
Christian Sieben ◽  
Alexander Benke ◽  
David M. Suter ◽  
Beat Fierz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Single Molecule Dynamics ◽  
Molecule Dynamics

scholarly journals Mapping protein binding stability on nucleosomal DNA by single-molecule approach

2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (a1) ◽  
pp. C111-C111
Author(s):  
Jianshi Jin ◽  
Teng-fei Lian ◽  
Xiaoliang Xie ◽  
Xiao-Dong Su
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Protein Interaction ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Shielding Effect ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Nucleosomal Dna ◽  
Dna Protein Interaction

The conformation of nucleosomal DNA is significantly different from that of a canonical B-form double stranded DNA (dsDNA), and is generally regarded to be less flexible and less accessible than free dsDNA due to the tight association of histone cores. Previous studies have demonstrated that the key mechanism involved in nucleosomal DNA-protein interaction is the protein accessibility to the DNA binding site. In this work, we used single molecule assays to measure the stability of two transcriptional factors (glucocorticoid receptor DNA binding domain (GRDBD) and estrogen receptor DNA-binding domain (ERDBD)) bound to their binding sites on different positions of the nucleosomal DNA. Interestingly, the results demonstrated that the nucleosomal DNA-GRDBD binding is not always consistent with the histone shielding effect, but adjusted by additional structural changes. Furthermore, the changes of these DNA-GRDBD interaction profiles were confirmed using molecular modeling and docking approaches based on their crystal structures. Very differently, ERDBD essentially is unable to bind to the nucleosomal DNA anywhere including the unblocked positions. We thus have concluded that the nucleosomal DNA-protein interaction is regulated not only by the histone shielding of the DNA binding sites, but also by the conformational changes of the nucleosomal DNA.

Deciphering the enigma of missing DNA binding domain of LacI family transcription factors

2021 ◽  
Vol 713 ◽  
pp. 109060
Author(s):  
Neetu Neetu ◽  
Madhusudhanarao Katiki ◽  
Jai Krishna Mahto ◽  
Monica Sharma ◽  
Anoop Narayanan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Laci Family

Reconstitution of transcriptional activation domains by reiteration of short peptide segments reveals the modular organization of a glutamine-rich activation domain

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 6056-6067
Author(s):  
M Tanaka ◽  
W Herr
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Pou Domain

The POU domain activator Oct-2 contains an N-terminal glutamine-rich transcriptional activation domain. An 18-amino-acid segment (Q18III) from this region reconstituted a fully functional activation domain when tandemly reiterated and fused to either the Oct-2 or GAL4 DNA-binding domain. A minimal transcriptional activation domain likely requires three tandem Q18III segments, because one or two tandem Q18III segments displayed little activity, whereas three to five tandem segments were active and displayed increasing activity with increasing copy number. As with natural Oct-2 activation domains, in our assay a reiterated activation domain required a second homologous or heterologous activation domain to stimulate transcription effectively when fused to the Oct-2 POU domain. These results suggest that there are different levels of synergy within and among activation domains. Analysis of reiterated activation domains containing mutated Q18III segments revealed that leucines and glutamines, but not serines or threonines, are critical for activity in vivo. Curiously, several reiterated activation domains that were inactive in vivo were active in vitro, suggesting that there are significant functional differences in our in vivo and in vitro assays. Reiteration of a second 18-amino-acid segment from the Oct-2 glutamine-rich activation domain (Q18II) was also active, but its activity was DNA-binding domain specific, because it was active when fused to the GAL4 than to the Oct-2 DNA-binding domain. The ability of separate short peptide segments derived from a single transcriptional activation domain to activate transcription after tandem reiteration emphasizes the flexible and modular nature of a transcriptional activation domain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document