scholarly journals GLMdenoise improves multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI data

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Charest ◽  
Nikolaus Kriegeskorte ◽  
Kendrick N. Kay

ABSTRACTGLMdenoise is a denoising technique for task-based fMRI. In GLMdenoise, estimates of spatially correlated noise (which may be physiological, instrumental, motion-related, or neural in origin) are derived from the data and incorporated as nuisance regressors in a general linear model (GLM) analysis. We previously showed that GLMdenoise outperforms a variety of other denoising techniques in terms of cross-validation accuracy of GLM estimates (Kay et al., 2013a). However, the practical impact of denoising for experimental studies remains unclear. Here we examine whether and to what extent GLMdenoise improves sensitivity in the context of multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI data. On a large number of participants (31 participants across 4 experiments; 3 T, gradient-echo, spatial resolution 2–3.75 mm, temporal resolution 1.3–2 s, number of conditions 32–75), we perform representational similarity analysis (Kriegeskorte et al., 2008a) as well as pattern classification (Haxby et al., 2001). We find that GLMdenoise substantially improves replicability of representational dissimilarity matrices (RDMs) across independent splits of each participant’s dataset (average RDM replicability increases from r = 0.46 to r = 0.61). Additionally, we find that GLMdenoise substantially improves pairwise classification accuracy (average classification accuracy increases from 79% correct to 84% correct). We show that GLMdenoise often improves and never degrades performance for individual participants and that GLMdenoise also improves across-participant consistency. We conclude that GLMdenoise is a useful tool that can be routinely used to maximize the amount of information extracted from fMRI activity patterns.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cameron J Higgins ◽  
Diego Vidaurre ◽  
Nils Kolling ◽  
Yunzhe Liu ◽  
Tim Behrens ◽  
...  

An emerging goal in neuroscience is tracking what information is represented in brain activity over time as a participant completes some task. Whilst EEG and MEG offer millisecond temporal resolution of how activity patterns emerge and evolve, standard decoding methods present significant barriers to interpretability as they obscure the underlying spatial and temporal activity patterns. We instead propose the use of a generative encoding model framework that simultaneously infers the multivariate spatial patterns of activity and the variable timing at which these patterns emerge on individual trials. An encoding model inversion allows predictions to be made about unseen test data in the same way as in standard decoding methodology. These SpatioTemporally Resolved MVPA (STRM) models can be flexibly applied to a wide variety of experimental paradigms, including classification and regression tasks. We show that these models provide insightful maps of the activity driving predictive accuracy metrics; demonstrate behaviourally meaningful variation in the timing of pattern emergence on individual trials; and achieve predictive accuracies that are either equivalent or surpass those achieved by more widely used methods. This provides a new avenue for investigating the brain's representational dynamics and could ultimately support more flexible experimental designs in future.


2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Hanke ◽  
Yaroslav O. Halchenko ◽  
Per B. Sederberg ◽  
Stephen José Hanson ◽  
James V. Haxby ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 491-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric A. Reavis ◽  
Junghee Lee ◽  
Jonathan K. Wynn ◽  
Stephen A. Engel ◽  
Mark S. Cohen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sirui Liu ◽  
Qing Yu ◽  
Peter U. Tse ◽  
Patrick Cavanagh

SummaryWhen perception differs from the physical stimulus, as it does for visual illusions and binocular rivalry, the opportunity arises to localize where perception emerges in the visual processing hierarchy. Representations prior to that stage differ from the eventual conscious percept even though they provide input to it. Here we investigate where and how a remarkable misperception of position emerges in the brain. This “double-drift” illusion causes a dramatic mismatch between retinal and perceived location, producing a perceived path that can differ from its physical path by 45° or more [1]. The deviations in the perceived trajectory can accumulate over at least a second [1] whereas other motion-induced position shifts accumulate over only 80 to 100 ms before saturating [2]. Using fMRI and multivariate pattern analysis, we find that the illusory path does not share activity patterns with a matched physical path in any early visual areas. In contrast, a whole-brain searchlight analysis reveals a shared representation in more anterior regions of the brain. These higher-order areas would have the longer time constants required to accumulate the small moment-to-moment position offsets that presumably originate in early visual cortices, and then transform these sensory inputs into a final conscious percept. The dissociation between perception and the activity in early sensory cortex suggests that perceived position does not emerge in what is traditionally regarded as the visual system but emerges instead at a much higher level.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document