scholarly journals Lineage-dependent differences and the role of IFITM3 in the type-I interferon-induced restriction of Zika virus

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore Gobillot ◽  
Daryl Humes ◽  
Amit Sharma ◽  
Julie Overbaugh

AbstractType-I interferon (IFN-I) is an important aspect of host innate antiviral response. Recent studies have shown that IFN-I can inhibit Zika virus (ZIKV) replication and that this is mediated in part by Interferon-induced transmembrane protein 3 (IFITM3). ZIKV infections in South America have led to severe congenital syndrome in a subset of infected infants. ZIKV was first identified in Africa, where there is limited evidence for the pathogenic effects associated with the American outbreak, which is fueled by infection with Asian-lineage strains, raising the possibility that the African and Asian ZIKV lineages have distinct pathogenic properties. Given the observation that IFN-I can inhibit ZIKV replication in cell culture, we asked whether ZIKV strains differed in their susceptibility to IFN-I. There was a range of susceptibilities to IFN-I inhibition across virus strains. Virus production in A549 cells was reduced from 3-42-fold for IFNα and 63-807-fold for IFNβ across a panel of nine viruses, five from the African-lineage and four from the Asian-lineage. African-lineage ZIKV strains were more resistant to IFN-I than Asian-lineage strains, but this difference was only significant for IFNα-mediated restriction (p = 0.049). Notably, over-expression of IFITM3 at similar levels induced by IFN-I did not significantly restrict either a prototype African lineage (MR 766) or Asian lineage (PRVABC59) isolate. Moreover, knocking out IFITM3 expression did not result in a significant increase in viral replication or a diminishment of the inhibition by IFN-I. Overall, our findings show that while diverse ZIKV strains are susceptible to the antiviral effects of IFN-I, African-lineage strains are more resistant to IFNα. In addition, the majority of the IFN-I-induced inhibition of ZIKV strains cannot be explained by IFITM3, suggesting that other unknown ISGs may be the driving force of the type I IFN response against ZIKV.Author summaryThe innate immune system, and specifically the type-I interferon response, is a critical component of the host response against viral infections. The recent unprecedented spread and severe pathogenic features of Zika virus in the Americas have led to significant interest in characterizing features of Zika virus strains that have fueled the American outbreak. Zika virus was first identified in Africa, where there is limited evidence for the pathogenic effects associated with the American outbreak. Here, we demonstrate that African-lineage Zika virus strains are significantly more resistant to the effects of type-I interferon, and that type-I interferon-mediated restriction of Zika virus strains is not explained by the host factor Interferon-induced transmembrane protein 3. This improved understanding of Zika virus-host interactions may explain certain pathogenic features of Asian-lineage Zika virus strains that have fueled the American Zika virus epidemic, and supports the search for as-yet-unidentified actors in the interferon response against Zika virus.

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Im Yun ◽  
Byung-Hak Song ◽  
Jordan C. Frank ◽  
Justin G. Julander ◽  
Irina A. Polejaeva ◽  
...  

Here, we report the 10,807-nucleotide-long consensus RNA genome sequences of three spatiotemporally distinct and genetically divergent Zika virus strains, with the functionality of their genomic sequences substantiated by reverse genetics: MR-766 (African lineage, Uganda, 1947), P6-740 (Asian lineage, Malaysia, 1966), and PRVABC-59 (Asian lineage-derived American strain, Puerto Rico, 2015).


Author(s):  
Lai Wei ◽  
Siqi Ming ◽  
Bin Zou ◽  
Yongjian Wu ◽  
Zhongsi Hong ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena N. Judd ◽  
Alison R. Gilchrist ◽  
Nicholas R. Meyerson ◽  
Sara L. Sawyer

Abstract Background The Type I interferon response is an important first-line defense against viruses. In turn, viruses antagonize (i.e., degrade, mis-localize, etc.) many proteins in interferon pathways. Thus, hosts and viruses are locked in an evolutionary arms race for dominance of the Type I interferon pathway. As a result, many genes in interferon pathways have experienced positive natural selection in favor of new allelic forms that can better recognize viruses or escape viral antagonists. Here, we performed a holistic analysis of selective pressures acting on genes in the Type I interferon family. We initially hypothesized that the genes responsible for inducing the production of interferon would be antagonized more heavily by viruses than genes that are turned on as a result of interferon. Our logic was that viruses would have greater effect if they worked upstream of the production of interferon molecules because, once interferon is produced, hundreds of interferon-stimulated proteins would activate and the virus would need to counteract them one-by-one. Results We curated multiple sequence alignments of primate orthologs for 131 genes active in interferon production and signaling (herein, “induction” genes), 100 interferon-stimulated genes, and 100 randomly chosen genes. We analyzed each multiple sequence alignment for the signatures of recurrent positive selection. Counter to our hypothesis, we found the interferon-stimulated genes, and not interferon induction genes, are evolving significantly more rapidly than a random set of genes. Interferon induction genes evolve in a way that is indistinguishable from a matched set of random genes (22% and 18% of genes bear signatures of positive selection, respectively). In contrast, interferon-stimulated genes evolve differently, with 33% of genes evolving under positive selection and containing a significantly higher fraction of codons that have experienced selection for recurrent replacement of the encoded amino acid. Conclusion Viruses may antagonize individual products of the interferon response more often than trying to neutralize the system altogether.


Author(s):  
Letizia Santinelli ◽  
Gabriella De Girolamo ◽  
Cristian Borrazzo ◽  
Paolo Vassalini ◽  
Claudia Pinacchio ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document