Formation of an anataselike phase in silica under anisotropic stress: Anab initioconstant-pressure study

2009 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Murat Durandurdu
Keyword(s):  
2007 ◽  
Vol 382 (2) ◽  
pp. 793-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. F. Mota ◽  
J. R. Kristiansen ◽  
T. Koivisto ◽  
N. E. Groeneboom

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Sobral Blanco ◽  
Camille Bonvin

SPE Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (05) ◽  
pp. 2582-2600
Author(s):  
Syed Shabbar Raza ◽  
Victor Rudolph ◽  
Tom Rufford ◽  
Zhongwei Chen

Summary A novel, simple, economical, and time-effective method to estimate the anisotropic permeability of coal is presented in this paper. This method estimates the coal’s anisotropic permeability by avoiding the tedious experimentation using triaxial permeameter or history-matching exercises. This method calculates the absolute magnitude of the permeability of the sample. In this regard, it is unlike other analytical permeability models, such as given by Palmer and Mansoori (1998) and Shi and Durucan (2014), that only calculate the permeability ratio (k/k0). The motivation is to find a method by which the permeability of the coal may be determined with reasonable accuracy by using only two easy measurements: mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) and anisotropic stress-strain (σ-ɛ) measurement. The main blocks of the method are based on cleat size that is obtained from MIP and randomly allocated to form flow channels/cleats through the coal; these cleats form parallel paths in the orthogonal face and butt cleat directions that provide the permeability; and the cleat width (b) is stress dependent. This method is further validated by comparing with the experimentally measured stress-dependent permeability of Surat Basin (Australia) coal and German coal in face cleat and butt cleat directions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document