scholarly journals Gauge-invariant tensor perturbations induced from baryon-CDM relative velocity and the B -mode polarization of the CMB

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
James Gurian ◽  
Donghui Jeong ◽  
Jai-chan Hwang ◽  
Hyerim Noh
2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (32) ◽  
pp. 1550172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Soo Myung ◽  
Taeyoon Moon

We study cosmological tensor perturbations generated during de Sitter inflation in the conformal gravity with mass parameter [Formula: see text]. It turns out that tensor power spectrum is scale-invariant.


Author(s):  
Michele Maggiore

Decomposition of the perturbations over FRW into scalar, vector and tensor perturbations. Physical and unphysical degrees of freedom. Gauge-invariant metric perturbations, Bardeen variables. Gauge-invariant perturbations of the energy-momentum tensor


It has been pointed out by Weyl, Eisenhart, Veblen and others, that the differential equations of geodesics in a manifold with a general affine structure do not remain unchanged in form when a new parameter is adopted. If in the equation d 2 x i / d ז 2 + ┌ i rs dx r / dז dx 8 / dז = 0 ז is replaced by (ז), the resulting equation is d 2 x i / d ז̄ 2 + ┌ i rs dx r / dז̄ dx 8 / dז̄ – dז̄ / dז d 2 ז / dז 2 dx i / dז̄ = 0.


The following is a direct and general construction, from the field quantities of the electrons and mesons and their derivatives, of a real, symmetrical and gauge-invariant tensor T kl whose divergence to l is — 1 times the four-force f k experienced by the matter. Interpreting T kl as the impulse-energy tensor of the material particles, for the case of no electromagnetic field the energy-momentum density obtained from T k4 is compared with that obtained from treating (ℏ/ i ) (∂/∂x k ) as the energy-momentum operator. Further, in the general case the Hamiltonian of the matter is compared with ∫ T 44 dxdydz . Both times, the two quantities compared agree apart from small modifications.


Author(s):  
A. Elgsaeter ◽  
T. Espevik ◽  
G. Kopstad

The importance of a high rate of temperature decrease (“rapid freezing”) when freezing specimens for freeze-etching has long been recognized1. The two basic methods for achieving rapid freezing are: 1) dropping the specimen onto a metal surface at low temperature, 2) bringing the specimen instantaneously into thermal contact with a liquid at low temperature and subsequently maintaining a high relative velocity between the liquid and the specimen. Over the last couple of years the first method has received strong renewed interest, particularily as the result of a series of important studies by Heuser and coworkers 2,3. In this paper we will compare these two freezing methods theoretically and experimentally.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document