scholarly journals Interactions of Two Transcriptional Repressors and Two Transcriptional Activators in Modulating Gibberellin Signaling in Aleurone Cells

2008 ◽  
Vol 148 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaolu Zou ◽  
Dawn Neuman ◽  
Qingxi J. Shen
2004 ◽  
Vol 134 (4) ◽  
pp. 1500-1513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhong-Lin Zhang ◽  
Zhen Xie ◽  
Xiaolu Zou ◽  
Jose Casaretto ◽  
Tuan-hua David Ho ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen Xie ◽  
Zhong-Lin Zhang ◽  
Xiaolu Zou ◽  
Guangxiao Yang ◽  
Setsuko Komatsu ◽  
...  

Plant Science ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 236 ◽  
pp. 214-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liyuan Zhang ◽  
Lingkun Gu ◽  
Patricia Ringler ◽  
Stanley Smith ◽  
Paul J. Rushton ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. 191-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Gubler ◽  
Peter Michael Chandler ◽  
Rosemary G. White ◽  
Danny J. Llewellyn ◽  
John V. Jacobsen

2008 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyoshi Mashiguchi ◽  
Eriko Urakami ◽  
Morifumi Hasegawa ◽  
Kazutsuka Sanmiya ◽  
Ichiro Matsumoto ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (17) ◽  
pp. 7695-7706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Soo Kim ◽  
Sung Bae Lee ◽  
Hyen Sam Kang

ABSTRACT In the yeast Saccharomyces diastaticus, expression of the STA1 gene, which encodes an extracellular glucoamylase, is negatively regulated by glucose. Here we demonstrate that glucose-dependent repression of STA1 expression is imposed by both Sfl1 and Nrg1, which serve as direct transcriptional repressors. We show that Nrg1 acts only on UAS1, and Sfl1 acts only on UAS2, in the STA1 promoter. When bound to its specific site, Sfl1 (but not Nrg1) prevents the binding to UAS2 of two transcriptional activators, Ste12 and Tec1, required for STA1 expression. We also found that Sfl1 contributes to STA1 repression by binding to the promoter and inhibiting the expression of FLO8, a gene that encodes a third transcriptional activator involved in STA1 expression. In addition, we show that the levels of Nrg1 and Sfl1 increase in glucose-grown cells, suggesting that the effects of glucose are mediated, at least in part, through an increase in the abundance of these repressors. NRG1 and SFL1 expression requires the Srb8-11 complex, and correspondingly, the Srb8-11 complex is also necessary for STA1 repression. However, our evidence indicates that the Srb8-11 complex does not associate with either the SFL1 or the NRG1 promoter and thus plays an indirect role in activating NRG1 and SFL1 expression.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Treen ◽  
Shunsuke F. Shimobayashi ◽  
Jorine Eeftens ◽  
Clifford P. Brangwynne ◽  
Michael Levine

AbstractRecent studies suggest that transcriptional activators and components of the pre-initiation complex (PIC) form higher order associations—clusters or condensates—at active loci. Considerably less is known about the distribution of repressor proteins responsible for gene silencing. Here, we develop an expression assay in living Ciona embryos that captures the liquid behavior of individual nucleoli undergoing dynamic fusion events. The assay is used to visualize puncta of Hes repressors, along with the Groucho/TLE corepressor. We observe that Hes.a/Gro puncta have the properties of viscous liquid droplets that undergo limited fusion events due to association with DNA. Hes.a mutants that are unable to bind DNA display hallmarks of liquid–liquid phase separation, including dynamic fusions of individual condensates to produce large droplets. We propose that the DNA template serves as a scaffold for the formation of Hes condensates, but limits the spread of transcriptional repressors to unwanted regions of the genome.


2005 ◽  
Vol 392 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gwen Lomberk ◽  
Raul Urrutia

Sp1 is one of the best characterized transcriptional activators. The biological importance of Sp1 is underscored by the fact that several hundreds of genes are thought to be regulated by this protein. However, during the last 5 years, a more extended family of Sp1-like transcription factors has been identified and characterized by the presence of a conserved DNA-binding domain comprising three Krüppel-like zinc fingers. Each distinct family member differs in its ability to regulate transcription, and, as a consequence, to influence cellular processes. Specific activation and repression domains located within the N-terminal regions of these proteins are responsible for these differences by facilitating interactions with various co-activators and co-repressors. The present review primarily focuses on discussing the structural, biochemical and biological functions of the repressor members of this family of transcription factors. The existence of these transcriptional repressors provides a tightly regulated mechanism for silencing a large number of genes that are already known to be activated by Sp1.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document