Real-space technique applied to crystal structure determination from powder data

2002 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Altomare ◽  
Corrado Cuocci ◽  
Carmelo Giacovazzo ◽  
Antonietta Guagliardi ◽  
Anna Grazia Giuseppina Moliterni ◽  
...  

Real-space techniques used for phase extension and refinement in the modern direct procedures forab initiocrystal structure solution of proteins have been optimized for application to powder diffraction data. The new process has been implemented in a modified version ofEXPO[Altomareet al.(1999).J.Appl.Cryst.32, 339–340]. The method is able to supply a structural model that is more complete than that provided by the standardEXPOprogram. The model is then refinedviaa diagonal least-squares procedure, but only when the ratio of the number of observations to the number of structure parameters to be refined is larger than a given threshold.

2019 ◽  
Vol 234 (4) ◽  
pp. 257-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina Schlesinger ◽  
Michael Bolte ◽  
Martin U. Schmidt

Abstract Structure solution of molecular crystals from powder diffraction data by real-space methods becomes challenging when the total number of degrees of freedom (DoF) for molecular position, orientation and intramolecular torsions exceeds a value of 20. Here we describe the structure determination from powder diffraction data of three pharmaceutical salts or cocrystals, each with four molecules per asymmetric unit on general position: Lamivudine camphorsulfonate (1, P 21, Z=4, Z′=2; 31 DoF), Theophylline benzamide (2, P 41, Z=8, Z′=2; 23 DoF) and Aminoglutethimide camphorsulfonate hemihydrate [3, P 21, Z=4, Z′=2; 31 DoF (if the H2O molecule is ignored)]. In the salts 1 and 3 the cations and anions have two intramolecular DoF each. The molecules in the cocrystal 2 are rigid. The structures of 1 and 2 could be solved without major problems by DASH using simulated annealing. For compound 3, indexing, space group determination and Pawley fit proceeded without problems, but the structure could not be solved by the real-space method, despite extensive trials. By chance, a single crystal of 3 was obtained and the structure was determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. A post-analysis revealed that the failure of the real-space method could neither be explained by common sources of error such as incorrect indexing, wrong space group, phase impurities, preferred orientation, spottiness or wrong assumptions on the molecular geometry or other user errors, nor by the real-space method itself. Finally, is turned out that the structure solution failed because of problems in the extraction of the integrated reflection intensities in the Pawley fit. With suitable extracted reflection intensities the structure of 3 could be determined in a routine way.


2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (S2) ◽  
pp. S470-S480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Portell ◽  
Xavier Alcobé ◽  
Latévi M. Lawson Daku ◽  
Radovan Černý ◽  
Rafel Prohens

The crystal structure of the third polymorph of dibenzylsquaramide (Portell, A. et al., 2009), (fig. 1) has been determined from laboratory X-ray powder diffraction data by means of direct space methods using the computing program FOX. (Favre-Nicolin and Černý, 2002) The structure resolution has not been straightforward due to several difficulties on the indexing process and in the space group assignment. The asymmetric unit contains two different conformers, which has implied an additional difficulty during the Rietveld (Rietveld, 1969) refinement. All these issues together with particular structural features of disquaramides are discussed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (a1) ◽  
pp. a300-a300
Author(s):  
Elena A. Kabova ◽  
Jason C. Cole ◽  
Oliver Korb ◽  
Adrian C. Williams ◽  
Kenneth Shankland

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Ryan L. Hodge ◽  
James A. Kaduk ◽  
Amy M. Gindhart ◽  
Thomas N. Blanton

The crystal structure of brigatinib Form A has been solved and refined using synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction data and optimized using density functional theory techniques. Brigatinib Form A crystallizes in space group P-1 (#2) with a = 9.59616(20), b = 10.9351(3), c = 14.9913(6) Å, α = 76.1210(13), β = 79.9082(11), γ = 74.0802(6)°, V = 1458.497(15) Å3, and Z = 2. Structure solution was complicated by the lowest cost factor solution having an unreasonable conformation of the dimethylphosphoryl group. The second-best structure yielded a better refinement. The crystal structure is characterized by alternating layers of aliphatic and aromatic portions of the molecules along the b-axis. Strong N–H⋯N hydrogen bonds link the molecules into pairs, with a graph set R2,2(8). There is a strong intramolecular N–H⋯O hydrogen bond to the phosphoryl group, which determines the orientation of this group. The powder pattern has been submitted to ICDD® for inclusion in the Powder Diffraction File™ (PDF®).


2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (S1) ◽  
pp. S110-S117 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. N. Zaloga ◽  
I. S. Yakimov ◽  
P. S. Dubinin

The paper describes an approach for automated crystal structure solution from powder diffraction data using the multi-population genetic algorithm (MPGA). The advantage of using co-evolution with the best individual exchange, compared with the using of the evolution with a single genetic algorithm without interpopulation exchange, is shown. As an example, the paper describes the use of MPGA for solving the [Pt(NH3)5Cl]Br3 crystal structure, having the tetragonal I41/a space group [a = 17.2587(5) Å, c = 15.1164(3) Å, Z = 16, unit-cell volume V = 4502.61(10) Å3]. The MPGA convergence charts and the atomic positions distribution maps of the MPGA populations are given. The description of the final structure solution is also shown.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document