Malaysia in Global Ratings: Position and Dynamics

2021 ◽  
pp. 127-134
Author(s):  
Kamal Ab Hamid ◽  
Shahrizal Badlishah ◽  
Abdul Rahman Jaaffar
Keyword(s):  
Global Ratings

External Validity of SCORS-G Ratings of Thematic Apperception Test Narratives in a Sample of Outpatients and Inpatients

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle B. Stein ◽  
Jenelle Slavin-Mulford ◽  
Caleb J. Siefert ◽  
Samuel Justin Sinclair ◽  
Michaela Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Life Events ◽  
Psychiatric Hospitalization ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Thematic Apperception Test ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Conduct Disordered ◽  
Global Ratings ◽  
Thematic Apperception ◽  
History Of

Abstract. The Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale-Global Ratings Method (SCORS-G; Stein, Hilsenroth, Slavin-Mulford, & Pinsker-Aspen, 2011 ) is a reliable system for coding narrative data, such as Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) stories. This study employs a cross-sectional, correlational design to examine associations between SCORS-G dimensions and life events in two clinical samples. Samples were composed of 177 outpatients and 57 inpatients who completed TAT protocols as part of routine clinical care. Two experienced raters coded narratives with the SCORS-G. Data on the following clinically relevant life events were collected: history of psychiatric hospitalization, suicidality, self-harming behavior, drug/alcohol abuse, conduct-disordered behavior, trauma, and education level. As expected, the clinical life event variable associated with the largest number of SCORS-G dimensions was Suicidality. Identity and Coherence of Self was related to self-harm history across samples. Emotional Investment in Relationships and Complexity of Representations were also associated with several life events. Clinical applications, limitations of the study, and future directions are reviewed.

Number of Performance Appraisal Dimensions and Reliability of Global Ratings

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey E. Miller ◽  
Carl L. Thornton ◽  
Megan Leasher ◽  
Esteban Tristan
Keyword(s):  
Performance Appraisal ◽  
Global Ratings

Effects of prognostic information on global ratings of psychotherapy outcome.

1975 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 810-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grady L. Blackwood ◽  
Hans H. Strupp ◽  
Laurence A. Bradley
Keyword(s):  
Psychotherapy Outcome ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Global Ratings

The Effects of Practice on Navigation Performance and Mental Workload with a Mirror-In-The-Sky Map

2021 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 1546-1550
Author(s):  
Holland M. Vasquez ◽  
Justin G. Hollands ◽  
Greg A. Jamieson
Keyword(s):  
Task Performance ◽  
Secondary Task ◽  
Mental Workload ◽  
Task Completion ◽  
Practice Performance ◽  
Global Ratings ◽  
Detection Response ◽  
Nasa Tlx ◽  
Response Task ◽  
Completion Times

Some previous research using a new augmented reality map display called Mirror-in-the-Sky (MitS) showed that performance was worse and mental workload (MWL) greater with MitS relative to a track-up map for navigation and wayfinding tasks. The purpose of the current study was to determine—for both MitS and track-up map—how much performance improves and MWL decreases with practice in a simple navigation task. We conducted a three-session experiment in which twenty participants completed a route following task in a virtual environment. Task completion times and collisions decreased, subjective MWL decreased, and secondary task performance improved with practice. The NASA-TLX Global ratings and Detection Response Task Hit Rates showed a larger decrease in MWL with MitS than the track-up map. Additionally, means for performance and workload measures showed that differences between the MitS and track-up map decreased in the first session. In later sessions the differences between the MitS and track-up map were negligible. As such, with practice performance and MWL may be comparable to a traditional track-up map.

scholarly journals Patient Global Ratings of Change Did Not Adequately Reflect Change Over Time: A Clinical Cohort Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 534-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
John S. Schmitt ◽  
J. Haxby Abbott
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Physical Therapy ◽  
Computerized Adaptive Testing ◽  
Recall Period ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Change Over Time ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Global Ratings ◽  
Discharge Status ◽  
Over Time

BackgroundGlobal ratings of change (GROCs) are commonly used in research and clinical practice to determine which patients respond to therapy, but their validity as a criterion for change has not been firmly established. One factor related to their validity is the length of the recall period.ObjectiveThe study objective was to examine the influence of the length of the recall period on the validity of a GROC for determining true change over time in the clinical setting.DesignThis was a longitudinal, single-cohort observational study.MethodsData from the Focus on Therapeutic Outcomes clinical database were collected for 8,955 patients reporting for physical therapy treatment of a knee disorder. Computerized adaptive testing was used to assess knee functional status (FS) at the initial and final (discharge) physical therapy visits. Each patient's GROC was obtained at discharge. Correlation and linear regression analyses of knee FS and GROC, stratified by length of time between intake and discharge, were conducted.ResultsCorrelations of GROC with knee FS change scores were modest even for the shortest period of recall (0–30 days) and were slightly lower for longer recall periods. Regression analyses using knee FS to predict GROC scores revealed similar findings. Correlations of GROC with intake and discharge scores indicated a strong bias toward discharge status, with little or no influence of baseline status. Standardized regression coefficients fitted the pattern expected for a valid measure of change but confirmed the strong bias toward discharge status.LimitationsOne version of the GROC administered serially in a cohort of patients seen in clinical practice was examined.ConclusionsThese results call into question the validity of GROCs for measuring change over time in routine clinical practice.

Redesign of the System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities in Anesthesiology Residency Training (SETQ Smart)

2016 ◽  
Vol 125 (5) ◽  
pp. 1056-1065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiki M. J. M. H. Lombarts ◽  
Andrew Ferguson ◽  
Markus W. Hollmann ◽  
Bente Malling ◽  
Onyebuchi A. Arah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Residency Training ◽  
Clinical Teaching ◽  
Teaching Performance ◽  
Self Evaluation ◽  
Faculty Teaching ◽  
Multicenter Survey ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
Global Ratings ◽  
Evaluation Of Teaching ◽  
Generalizability Analysis

Abstract Background Given the increasing international recognition of clinical teaching as a competency and regulation of residency training, evaluation of anesthesiology faculty teaching is needed. The System for Evaluating Teaching Qualities (SETQ) Smart questionnaires were developed for assessing teaching performance of faculty in residency training programs in different countries. This study investigated (1) the structure, (2) the psychometric qualities of the new tools, and (3) the number of residents’ evaluations needed per anesthesiology faculty to use the instruments reliably. Methods Two SETQ Smart questionnaires—for faculty self-evaluation and for resident evaluation of faculty—were developed. A multicenter survey was conducted among 399 anesthesiology faculty and 430 residents in six countries. Statistical analyses included exploratory factor analysis, reliability analysis using Cronbach α, item-total scale correlations, interscale correlations, comparison of composite scales to global ratings, and generalizability analysis to assess residents’ evaluations needed per faculty. Results In total, 240 residents completed 1,622 evaluations of 247 faculty. The SETQ Smart questionnaires revealed six teaching qualities consisting of 25 items. Cronbach α’s were very high (greater than 0.95) for the overall SETQ Smart questionnaires and high (greater than 0.80) for the separate teaching qualities. Interscale correlations were all within the acceptable range of moderate correlation. Overall, questionnaire and scale scores correlated moderately to highly with the global ratings. For reliable feedback to individual faculty, three to five resident evaluations are needed. Conclusions The first internationally piloted questionnaires for evaluating individual anesthesiology faculty teaching performance can be reliably, validly, and feasibly used for formative purposes in residency training.

scholarly journals Clinical Utilization of Point-of-care Ultrasound After Training: A Prospective Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wan-Ching Lien ◽  
Chih-Heng Chang ◽  
Kah-Meng Chong ◽  
Meng-Che Wu ◽  
Cheng-Yi Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Global Rating ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Clinical Utilization ◽  
Global Ratings ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background: This study aimed to investigate the clinical utilization of PoCUS of the first post-graduate year residents after a PoCUS curriculum. Methods: It was conducted at the emergency department of the National Taiwan University Hospital between July 2015 and October 2017. Every resident had one-month ED training and a curriculum was implemented during the first week. The post-training objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) global ratings were obtained, as well as the sonographic examinations by the residents. The participants were categorized into 4 groups: group 1 performed PoCUS before and after the curriculum; group 2 performed only after the curriculum; group 3 performed only before the curriculum; the last did not perform any examinations. Results: Two hundred and thirty-nine residents participated. The median global rating was 4 (interquartile ranges, 4-5). A significantly increasing number of residents integrated PoCUS into patient care (64 vs. 170, p=0.037) with acceptable image quality after the curriculum. Nearly 30% of residents did not use PoCUS although no differences existed in the OSCE global ratings. Group 1 performed more cases with better image quality and using ≥2 ultrasound applications (8/100 vs. 82/359, p=0.0009) after the curriculum. Group 1 performed more cases with better image quality than group 2 after the curriculum. In groups 3 and 4, “no suitable cases” (25/69), and “choosing other imaging priorities” (43/69) were the main feedbacks for not performing PoCUS. Conclusions: A focused training had a substantial positive impact on the utilization of PoCUS of the residents. The global ratings could not predict whether to integrate PoCUS into clinical practice. Further studies would be needed for the sustained effects of the curriculum and how to encourage these residents in groups 3 and 4 to use PoCUS.Clinical trial registration: NCT03738033.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document