Model structure effect on static aeroelastic deformation of the NASA CRM

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 4167-4183
Author(s):  
Houda Bdeiwi ◽  
Andrea Ciarella ◽  
Andrew Peace ◽  
Marco Hahn

Purpose This paper aims to present a computational aeroelastic capability based on a fluid–structure interaction (FSI) methodology and validate it using the NASA Common Research Model (CRM). Focus is placed on the effect of the wind tunnel model structural features on the static aeroelastic deformations. Design/methodology/approach The FSI methodology couples high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics to a simplified beam representation of the finite element model. Beam models of the detailed CRM wind tunnel model and a simplified CRM model are generated. The correlation between the numerical simulations and wind tunnel data for varying angles of attack is analysed and the influence of the model structure on the static aeroelastic deformation and aerodynamics is studied. Findings The FSI results follow closely the general trend of the experimental data, showing the importance of considering structural model deformations in the aerodynamic simulations. A thorough examination of the results reveals that it is not unequivocal that the fine details of the structural model are important in the aeroelastic predictions. Research limitations/implications The influence of some changes in structural deformation on transonic wing aerodynamics appears to be complex and non-linear in nature and should be subject to further investigations. Originality/value It is shown that the use of a beam model in the FSI approach provides a reliable alternative to the more costly coupling with the full FE model. It also highlights the non-necessity to develop precise, detailed structural models for accurate FSI simulations.

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Wang ◽  
Guofu Yin ◽  
Zhengyu Zhang ◽  
Shuiliang Wang ◽  
Tao Zhao ◽  
...  

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to introduce a novel method for developing static aeroelastic models based on rapid prototyping for wind tunnel testing. Design/methodology/approach – A metal frame and resin covers are applied to a static aeroelastic wind tunnel model, which uses the difference of metal and resin to achieve desired stiffness distribution by the stiffness similarity principle. The metal frame is made by traditional machining, and resin covers are formed by stereolithgraphy. As demonstrated by wind tunnel testing and stiffness measurement, the novel method of design and fabrication of the static aeroelastic model based on stereolithgraphy is practical and feasible, and, compared with that of the traditional static elastic model, is prospective due to its lower costs and shorter period for its design and production, as well as avoiding additional stiffness caused by outer filler. Findings – This method for developing static aeroelastic wind tunnel model with a metal frame and resin covers is feasible, especially for aeroelastic wind tunnel models with complex external aerodynamic shape, which could be accurately constructed based on rapid prototypes in a shorter time with a much lower cost. The developed static aeroelastic aircraft model with a high aspect ratio shows its stiffness distribution in agreement with the design goals, and it is kept in a good condition through the wind tunnel testing at a Mach number ranging from 0.4 to 0.65. Research limitations/implications – The contact stiffness between the metal frame and resin covers is difficult to calculate accurately even by using finite element analysis; in addition, the manufacturing errors have some effects on the stiffness distribution of aeroelastic models, especially for small-size models. Originality/value – The design, fabrication and ground testing of aircraft static aeroelastic models presented here provide accurate stiffness and shape stimulation in a cheaper and sooner way compared with that of traditional aeroelastic models. The ground stiffness measurement uses the photogrammetry, which can provide quick, and precise, evaluation of the actual stiffness distribution of a static aeroelastic model. This study, therefore, expands the applications of rapid prototyping on wind tunnel model fabrication, especially for the practical static aeroelastic wind tunnel tests.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (13) ◽  
pp. 26476-26481
Author(s):  
Dijana Damljanović ◽  
Jovan Isaković ◽  
Marko Miloš

2013 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3789-3798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kittikhun Moophayak ◽  
Kabkaew L. Sukontason ◽  
Hiromu Kurahashi ◽  
Roy C. Vogtsberger ◽  
Kom Sukontason

2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 708-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Flores ◽  
Enrique Ortega ◽  
Eugenio Oñate

1973 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-142
Author(s):  
J. E. Hackett ◽  
J. L. Justice

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document