Corporate Political Activity and Financial Performance: A Corporate Social Responsibility Perspective

2019 ◽  
pp. 235-264
Author(s):  
Woon Leong Lin ◽  
Murali Sambasivan ◽  
Jo Ann Ho ◽  
Siong Hook Law
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Political Activity ◽  
Corporate Political Activity ◽  
Corporate Social

scholarly journals Impact of Corporate Political Activity on the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Woon Lin ◽  
Jo Ho ◽  
Murali Sambasivan
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Panel Data ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Dynamic Panel Data ◽  
Political Activity ◽  
Corporate Political Activity ◽  
Dynamic Panel ◽  
Financial Position ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Relationship

As corporate social responsibility (CSR) gains momentum in the business world, it is imperative to comprehend the relationship between CSR and corporate financial performance (CFP). While there is prior research looking at this relationship, scholars have proposed a contingency view that is meant to determine the situational contexts in which critical associations between CFP and CSR activities will arise. This study provides further insight into the moderating effects of corporate political activity, specifying the ways in which different arrangements of corporate CSR and CPA might align or otherwise, thus influencing CFP beyond associated dissimilar effects on corporate performance. The data for this study was obtained for the periods 2007–2016 from the samples selected from the list of Fortune’s World’s Most Admired Companies. The dynamic panel data was analyzed using the System Generalized Method of Moment estimation. The main findings are that CSR does not significantly influence CFP. However, CPA does negatively moderate the relationship between CSR and CFP. This indicates that high political expenditures worsen a firm’s financial position compared to the financial position of firms with less spending on CPA.

Nonmarket Responses to Regulation: A Signaling Theory Approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 865-891
Author(s):  
Lee Warren Brown ◽  
Irene Goll ◽  
Abdul A. Rasheed ◽  
Wayne S. Crawford
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Signaling Theory ◽  
Political Activity ◽  
Theory Approach ◽  
Federal Regulations ◽  
Corporate Political Activity ◽  
The Us ◽  
Regulatory Intensity ◽  
Corporate Social

We examine how regulatory intensity and increases in regulation affect the nonmarket activities of firms. Using a signaling theory perspective, we seek to better understand how firms respond to regulation in terms of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate political activity (CPA), the two main pillars of nonmarket activity. Examination of both CSR and CPA in concert rather than in isolation provides insights into whether they are complements or substitutes. We use textual analysis of the US Code of Federal Regulations to measure regulatory intensity and increases in regulation. Based on a sample of 331 S&P 500 firms for the period 1998–2014, our findings suggest that regulatory intensity leads to more nonmarket responses from firms. We also find support for nonlinear relationships between CSR and CPA.

Corporate Political Activity and Sensitivity to Social Attacks: The Case of Family-Managed Firms

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-174
Author(s):  
James G. Combs ◽  
Richard J. Gentry ◽  
Sean Lux ◽  
Peter Jaskiewicz ◽  
T. Russell Crook
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Political Activity ◽  
Large Firms ◽  
Corporate Political Activity ◽  
Standard And Poor's ◽  
Corporate Social

Family-managed firms take actions to protect their reputations. We theorize that one such action involves avoiding corporate political activity (CPA) that expose firms to social attack, especially when also invested in corporate social responsibility. Because large firms are frequent targets for social attack, the same sensitivity that encourages most family managers to avoid CPA encourages it among the largest as a buffer. Supportive analysis of Standard and Poor’s 500 firms shows that family-managed firms spend, on average, 86% less on CPA, even less when invested in substantive corporate social responsibility. The largest invest as much or more in CPA as nonfamily peers.

Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan Dan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Perbankan Di Bursa Efek Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-111
Author(s):  
Sulastiningsih Sulastiningsih ◽  
Rizka Imanita Sholihati
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Annual Report ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Corporate Social

This study aims to determine whether the financial performance measured by using CAR, ROA, LDR, BOPO, and CSR can affect the value of banking companies as measured by using PBV. This study uses secondary data taken from the annual report of banking companies during the year 2012-2016 listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The number of samples of this study as many as 25 banking companies with a total of 125 data. This research method is quantitative research. The results of this study indicate the effect of CAR, ROA, LDR, BOPO, and CSR variables on firm value measured by using PBV in a banking company listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Keywords: CAR, ROA, LDR, BOPO, CSR, PBV

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document