Machine Learning Algorithms for Posture Identification of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients using IoT Solutions

Abstract Introduction Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep-related breathing disorder with an estimation of one billion people. Full-night polysomnography is considered the gold standard for OSA diagnosis. However, it is time-consuming, expensive and is not readily available in many parts of the world. Many screening questionnaires and scores have been proposed for OSA prediction with high sensitivity and low specificity. The present study is intended to develop models with various machine learning techniques to predict the severity of OSA by incorporating features from multiple questionnaires. Methods Subjects who underwent full-night polysomnography in Torr sleep center, Texas and completed 5 OSA screening questionnaires/scores were included. OSA was diagnosed by using Apnea-Hypopnea Index ≥ 5. We trained five different machine learning models including Deep Neural Networks with the scaled principal component analysis (DNN-PCA), Random Forest (RF), Adaptive Boosting classifier (ABC), and K-Nearest Neighbors classifier (KNC) and Support Vector Machine Classifier (SVMC). Training:Testing subject ratio of 65:35 was used. All features including demographic data, body measurement, snoring and sleepiness history were obtained from 5 OSA screening questionnaires/scores (STOP-BANG questionnaires, Berlin questionnaires, NoSAS score, NAMES score and No-Apnea score). Performance parametrics were used to compare between machine learning models. Results Of 180 subjects, 51.5 % of subjects were male with mean (SD) age of 53.6 (15.1). One hundred and nineteen subjects were diagnosed with OSA. Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) of DNN-PCA, RF, ABC, KNC, SVMC, STOP-BANG questionnaire, Berlin questionnaire, NoSAS score, NAMES score, and No-Apnea score were 0.85, 0.68, 0.52, 0.74, 0.75, 0.61, 0.63, 0,61, 0.58 and 0,58 respectively. DNN-PCA showed the highest AUROC with sensitivity of 0.79, specificity of 0.67, positive-predictivity of 0.93, F1 score of 0.86, and accuracy of 0.77. Conclusion Our result showed that DNN-PCA outperforms OSA screening questionnaires, scores and other machine learning models. Support (if any):

Download Full-text

Machine learning for image-based detection of patients with obstructive sleep apnea: an exploratory study

Sleep And Breathing ◽

10.1007/s11325-021-02301-7 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Satoru Tsuiki ◽

Takuya Nagaoka ◽

Tatsuya Fukuda ◽

Yuki Sakamoto ◽

Fernanda R. Almeida ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Neural Network ◽

Machine Learning ◽

Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽

Sleep Apnea ◽

Convolutional Neural Network ◽

Deep Convolutional Neural Network ◽

Apnea Hypopnea Index ◽

Cephalometric Analysis ◽

Obstructive Sleep ◽

Main Region

Abstract Purpose In 2-dimensional lateral cephalometric radiographs, patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) exhibit a more crowded oropharynx in comparison with non-OSA. We tested the hypothesis that machine learning, an application of artificial intelligence (AI), could be used to detect patients with severe OSA based on 2-dimensional images. Methods A deep convolutional neural network was developed (n = 1258; 90%) and tested (n = 131; 10%) using data from 1389 (100%) lateral cephalometric radiographs obtained from individuals diagnosed with severe OSA (n = 867; apnea hypopnea index > 30 events/h sleep) or non-OSA (n = 522; apnea hypopnea index < 5 events/h sleep) at a single center for sleep disorders. Three kinds of data sets were prepared by changing the area of interest using a single image: the original image without any modification (full image), an image containing a facial profile, upper airway, and craniofacial soft/hard tissues (main region), and an image containing part of the occipital region (head only). A radiologist also performed a conventional manual cephalometric analysis of the full image for comparison. Results The sensitivity/specificity was 0.87/0.82 for full image, 0.88/0.75 for main region, 0.71/0.63 for head only, and 0.54/0.80 for the manual analysis. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was the highest for main region 0.92, for full image 0.89, for head only 0.70, and for manual cephalometric analysis 0.75. Conclusions A deep convolutional neural network identified individuals with severe OSA with high accuracy. Future research on this concept using AI and images can be further encouraged when discussing triage of OSA.

Download Full-text

419 STOP-Bang Score and History of Radiation Predicts Risk of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Cancer Patients: A Machine Learning Study

SLEEP ◽

10.1093/sleep/zsab072.418 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽

pp. A166-A166

Author(s):

Ankita Paul ◽

Karen Wong ◽

Anup Das ◽

Diane Lim ◽

Miranda Tan

Keyword(s):

Machine Learning ◽

Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽

Sleep Apnea ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Prediction Accuracy ◽

Screening Tools ◽

Cancer Type ◽

Sleep Study ◽

Obstructive Sleep ◽

History Of

Abstract Introduction Cancer patients are at an increased risk of moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The STOP-Bang score is a commonly used screening questionnaire to assess risk of OSA in the general population. We hypothesize that cancer-relevant features, like radiation therapy (RT), may be used to determine the risk of OSA in cancer patients. Machine learning (ML) with non-parametric regression is applied to increase the prediction accuracy of OSA risk. Methods Ten features namely STOP-Bang score, history of RT to the head/neck/thorax, cancer type, cancer stage, metastasis, hypertension, diabetes, asthma, COPD, and chronic kidney disease were extracted from a database of cancer patients with a sleep study. The ML technique, K-Nearest-Neighbor (KNN), with a range of k values (5 to 20), was chosen because, unlike Logistic Regression (LR), KNN is not presumptive of data distribution and mapping function, and supports non-linear relationships among features. A correlation heatmap was computed to identify features having high correlation with OSA. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed on the correlated features and then KNN was applied on the components to predict the risk of OSA. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) - Area Under Curve (AUC) and Precision-Recall curves were computed to compare and validate performance for different test sets and majority class scenarios. Results In our cohort of 174 cancer patients, the accuracy in determining OSA among cancer patients using STOP-Bang score was 82.3% (LR) and 90.69% (KNN) but reduced to 89.9% in KNN using all 10 features mentioned above. PCA + KNN application using STOP-Bang score and RT as features, increased prediction accuracy to 94.1%. We validated our ML approach using a separate cohort of 20 cancer patients; the accuracies in OSA prediction were 85.57% (LR), 91.1% (KNN), and 92.8% (PCA + KNN). Conclusion STOP-Bang score and history of RT can be useful to predict risk of OSA in cancer patients with the PCA + KNN approach. This ML technique can refine screening tools to improve prediction accuracy of OSA in cancer patients. Larger studies investigating additional features using ML may improve OSA screening accuracy in various populations Support (if any):

Download Full-text

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Events Classification by Effective Radar Cross Section (ERCS) Method Using Microwave Doppler Radar and Machine Learning Classifier

2020 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Biomedical Conference (IMBioC) ◽

10.1109/imbioc47321.2020.9385028 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Farjana Snigdha ◽

Shekh M M Islam ◽

Olga Boric-Lubecke ◽

Victor Lubecke

Keyword(s):

Machine Learning ◽

Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽

Sleep Apnea ◽

Cross Section ◽

Doppler Radar ◽

Radar Cross Section ◽

Learning Classifier ◽

Obstructive Sleep

Download Full-text

Literature Review on Sleep APNEA Analysis by Machine Learning Algorithms Using ECG Signals

Journal of Physics Conference Series ◽

10.1088/1742-6596/1937/1/012054 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1937 (1) ◽

pp. 012054

Author(s):

V. Ankitha ◽

P. Manimegalai ◽

P. Subha Hency Jose ◽

P. Raji

Keyword(s):

Machine Learning ◽

Sleep Apnea ◽

Literature Review ◽

Learning Algorithms ◽

Machine Learning Algorithms ◽

Ecg Signals

Download Full-text

Prediction of Sleep Apnea Using EEG Signals and Machine Learning Algorithms

10.1109/tiptekno53239.2021.9632895 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Aysu Onargan ◽

Busra Gavcar ◽

Gulizar Caliskan ◽

Aydin Akan

Keyword(s):

Machine Learning ◽

Sleep Apnea ◽

Learning Algorithms ◽

Machine Learning Algorithms ◽

Eeg Signals

Download Full-text

407 Explanatory analysis of polysomnography for the identification of sleep apnea hypopnea events using deep learning neural network

SLEEP ◽

10.1093/sleep/zsab072.406 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽

pp. A161-A162

Author(s):

Soonhyun Yook ◽

Chaitanya Gupte ◽

Zhixian Han ◽

Eun Yeon Joo ◽

Hea Ree Park ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽

Deep Learning ◽

Sleep Apnea ◽

Learning Algorithms ◽

Sleep Apnea Syndrome ◽

Learning Approaches ◽

Explanatory Analysis ◽

Technology Advancement ◽

Obstructive Sleep ◽

Deep Learning Neural Network

Abstract Introduction Using deep learning algorithms, we investigated univariate and multivariate effects of four polysomnography features including heart rate (HR), electrocardiogram (ECG), oxygen saturation (SpO2) and nasal air flow (NAF) on the identification of sleep apnea and hypopnea events. This explanatory analysis that may clarify the sensitivity and specificity of those features to SAs and SHs have not been probed. Methods We studied 804 polysomonography samples from 704 patients with obstructive sleep apnea and 100 controls. The input data were converted into scalograms as 4-channel 2D images to train Xception networks. For training, 77,638 patches were sampled from the original 6-hour sleep data with 30-second time width. A 10% of these patches were segregated as the test-set. With each feature sets, we tested the following classifications: 1) normal vs apnea vs hypopnea; 2) normal vs. apnea+hypopnea; 3) normal vs. apnea; and 4) normal vs. hypopnea. Results SpO2 classified normal vs. apnea most accurately (98%), followed by NAF (85%), ECG (77%), and HR (63%). SpO2 also showed the highest accuracy in classifying normal vs. hypopnea (87%), and normal vs. apnea+hypopnea (96%) and three groups (82%). When the combination of four features were used, the classification accuracies were generally improved compared to use of SpO2 only (normal vs. apnea 99%; vs. hypopnea 89%; vs. apnea+hypopnea: 94%; three groups: 86%). Conclusion Deep learning with SpO2 or NAF feature most accurately classified apneas from normal sleep events, suggesting these features’ characterization of sleep apnea events. Oxygen desaturation, which is a typical pattern of hypopnea, was only the feature showing reliable accuracy in classifying hypopnea vs. normal. Nevertheless, combination of four polysomnography features could improve the identification of sleep apnea and hypopnea. Furthermore, classifying normal vs. apnea+hypopnea was more accurate than separately classifying three groups, suggesting deep learning approaches as the primary screen tool. Since the classification accuracy of using SpO2 was higher than any other features, developing a portable equipment measuring SpO2 and running deep learning algorithms has the potential for inexpensive, accurate diagnostics of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Support (if any) This study was supported by USC STEVENS CENTER FOR INNOVATION TECHNOLOGY ADVANCEMENT GRANTS (TAG), BrightFocus Foundation Award (A2019052S).

Download Full-text