A Morphological and Structural Study of Four Elastomeric Impression Materials Used in Dental Medicine

Author(s):  
Irina Gradinaru ◽  
Bianca-Iulia Ciubotaru ◽  
Ana-Lavinia Vasiliu
2011 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. e66
Author(s):  
F. Martins ◽  
E.O.B. Martins ◽  
R.M.P. Machado

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-208
Author(s):  
Makbule Heval Şahan ◽  
Rahime Tüzünsoy Aktaş ◽  
Niler Özdemir Akkuş

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Fahd S. Ikram ◽  
◽  
Jawad M. Mikaeel ◽  
Ranj A. Omer ◽  
◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 08 (03) ◽  
pp. 366-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Cristine Ghiggi ◽  
Arno Kieling Steiger ◽  
Maurem Leitão Marcondes ◽  
Eduardo Gonçalves Mota ◽  
Luiz Henrique Burnett ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objectives: The objective of the following study is to evaluate the interaction between the resin materials used in immediate dentin sealing (IDS) techniques and impression materials with two different techniques to eliminate the oxygen-inhibition layer. Materials and Methods: The occlusal dentin surface of 35 human molars was exposed. The teeth were used in two Groups: Group 1 – Impression with Express XT; Group 2 – Impression with Impregum. Groups 1 and 2 were divided into 14 subgroups: Groups 1a and 2a – Control groups; 1b and 2b – IDS with Clearfil SE Bond (CSE); 1c and 2c – IDS with CSE + additional polymerization with glycerin jelly; 1d and 2d – IDS with CSE + alcohol; 1e and 2e – IDS with CSE and Protect Liner F (PLF); 1f and 2f – IDS with CSE and PLF + additional polymerization with glycerin jelly; and 1g and 2g – IDS with CSE and PLF + alcohol. Five teeth were used in each experimental group, and the tooth surface was photographed using a digital camera. Results: Small quantity of unpolymerized impression material remained attached to the CSE or to the PLF in Groups 1b and 1e. Groups 1c and 1d prevented the interaction. Small quantity of polymerized impression material remained attached to the CSE or to the PLF for Groups 2b and 2e. The same interaction was observed for Groups 2c and 2d. For Groups 2c and 2f, no interactions were observed. Conclusion: Resin materials interacted with impression materials. The application of glycerin jelly and alcohol prevented the interaction of CSE with Express XT and PLF with Impregum; however, these treatments were not completely effective in preventing the interaction of CSE with Impregum and PLF with Express XT.


PRILOZI ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Borjan Naumovski ◽  
Biljana Kapushevska

Abstract A quality-made dental impression is a prerequisite for successful fixed-prosthodontic fabrication and is directly dependent on the dimensional stability, accuracy and flexibility of the elastomeric impression materials, as well as on the appropriately used impression techniques. The purpose of this paper is to provide a literature review of relevant scientific papers which discuss the use of various silicone impression materials, different impression techniques and to evaluate their impact on the dimensional stability and accuracy of the obtained impressions. Scientific papers and studies were selected according to the materials used, the sample size, impression technique, storage time, type of measurements and use of spacer for the period between 2002 and 2016. In the reviewed literature several factors that influence the dimensional stability and accuracy of silicone impression molds, including the choice of the type of viscosity, impression material thickness, impression technique, retention of the impression material on the tray, storage time before the casting, number of castings, hydrophilicity of the material, release of byproducts, contraction after polymerization, thermal contraction and incomplete elastic recovery were presented. The literature review confirmed the lack of standardization of methodologies applied in the research and their great diversity. All findings point to the superiority of the addition silicone compared to the condensation silicone.


1976 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 407-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Stauffer ◽  
Jean-Marc Meyer ◽  
Jean-Noel Nally

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. e191603
Author(s):  
Camilla Lopes Cerqueira ◽  
Roniel Kappler ◽  
Andrea Araújo Nobrega Cavalcanti ◽  
Emilena Maria Castor Xisto Lima

Aim: To evaluate the marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials. Methods: a metal die and a matrix applied through a direct technique were used to fabricate the specimens. The impression materials used as a matrix were divided into four groups: Irreversible hydrocolloid
(IH), laboratory silicone (LS), condensation silicone (CS), and addition silicone (AS). After the impression procedures, each matrix was loaded with the provisional prosthetic materials, Alike, Duralay, Protemp 4, and Structur 3 (n = 12). Marginal discrepancy was evaluated using a stereomicroscope at ×45 magnification. The images obtained were transferred to the Corel Draw X7 program, and the distances from the cervical margins of the specimen to the reference lines at the metal die were measured vertically. The data were analyzed by using 2-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test (α=.05). Results: the acrylic resins had higher values ​​of marginal discrepancy compared to the bisacrylic resins. A statistically significant difference was found between all impression materials, and the irreversible hydrocolloid presented higher values of discrepancy (303.28–613.31 μm), whereas addition silicone had the lowest (48.61–190.06 μm). Conclusions: the bisacrylic resins had a better marginal adaptation compared to the acrylic resins. The addition silicone promoted a better marginal adaptation of the provisional prosthetic materials tested, followed by condensation silicone, laboratory silicone, and irreversible hydrocolloid.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (SPL3) ◽  
pp. 430-434
Author(s):  
Praveen Kumar S ◽  
Balaji Ganesh S ◽  
Vinay Sivasamy

The expression "Smart restorative material" alludes to those that can be changed in controlled style for example, stress, temperature moisture, pH and electrical or attractive fields. The need of great importance is to present dental materials that have biomimicking properties of regular tooth structure. Different biocompatible materials have been presented and generally utilized in numerous fields of dentistry. Smart restorative behaviour of substances occurs while it detects a few improvements from the overall circumstance and responds to it in a helpful, reproducible and for the maximum element reversible way. A key component of smart conduct incorporates its capacity to come back to the first state. A portion of these materials utilized are altered glass ionomers, calcium phosphate discharging pit and fissure sealants, smart composites, smart ceramic, compomers, orthodontic shape-memory alloys, amalgams, smart impression materials, smart sutures, smart burs, smart endodontic files and so forth. These materials have changed the dentistry and are the start of another part in Biosmart Dentistry.


This chapter investigates the materials used in dentistry today. This includes the properties of dental materials, amalgam, and composite resins. Enamel and dentine bonding are discussed, along with dentine-adhesive systems, glass ionomers and composite-based products, and cements. Impression materials and techniques are considered, along with casting alloys, wrought alloys, dental ceramics, and computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided manufacture (CAM). The chapter concludes with a look at denture materials, from acrylic resins to rebasing, and the safety of dental materials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document