Post-Stroke Identification of EEG Signal Using Wavelet Filters and 2D-Convolutional Neural Networks

Author(s):  
Mochamad Miftah Farid ◽  
Esmeralda Contessa Djamal
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1890-1898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esmeralda C. Djamal ◽  
Rizkia I. Ramadhan ◽  
Miranti I. Mandasari ◽  
Deswara Djajasasmita

Post-stroke patients need ongoing rehabilitation to restore dysfunction caused by an attack so that a monitoring device is required. EEG signals reflect electrical activity in the brain, which also informs the condition of post-stroke patient recovery. However, the EEG signal processing model needs to provide information on the post-stroke state. The development of deep learning allows it to be applied to the identification of post-stroke patients. This study proposed a method for identifying post-stroke patients using convolutional neural networks (CNN). Wavelet is used for EEG signal information extraction as a feature of machine learning, which reflects the condition of post-stroke patients. This feature is Delta, Alpha, Beta, Theta, and Mu waves. Moreover, the five waves, amplitude features are also added according to the characteristics of the post-stroke EEG signal. The results showed that the feature configuration is essential as distinguish. The accuracy of the testing data was 90% with amplitude and Beta features compared to 70% without amplitude or Beta. The experimental results also showed that adaptive moment estimation (Adam) optimization model was more stable compared to Stochastic gradient descent (SGD). But SGD can provide higher accuracy than the Adam model. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 721-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphane Mallat ◽  
Sixin Zhang ◽  
Gaspar Rochette

Abstract A major issue in harmonic analysis is to capture the phase dependence of frequency representations, which carries important signal properties. It seems that convolutional neural networks have found a way. Over time-series and images, convolutional networks often learn a first layer of filters that are well localized in the frequency domain, with different phases. We show that a rectifier then acts as a filter on the phase of the resulting coefficients. It computes signal descriptors that are local in space, frequency and phase. The nonlinear phase filter becomes a multiplicative operator over phase harmonics computed with a Fourier transform along the phase. We prove that it defines a bi-Lipschitz and invertible representation. The correlations of phase harmonics coefficients characterize coherent structures from their phase dependence across frequencies. For wavelet filters, we show numerically that signals having sparse wavelet coefficients can be recovered from few phase harmonic correlations, which provide a compressive representation.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Farahat ◽  
Christoph Reichert ◽  
Catherine M. Sweeney-Reed ◽  
Hermann Hinrichs

ABSTRACTObjectiveConvolutional neural networks (CNNs) have proven successful as function approximators and have therefore been used for classification problems including electroencephalography (EEG) signal decoding for brain-computer interfaces (BCI). Artificial neural networks, however, are considered black boxes, because they usually have thousands of parameters, making interpretation of their internal processes challenging. Here we systematically evaluate the use of CNNs for EEG signal decoding and investigate a method for visualizing the CNN model decision process.ApproachWe developed a CNN model to decode the covert focus of attention from EEG event-related potentials during object selection. We compared the CNN and the commonly used linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier performance, applied to datasets with different dimensionality, and analyzed transfer learning capacity. Moreover, we validated the impact of single model components by systematically altering the model. Furthermore, we investigated the use of saliency maps as a tool for visualizing the spatial and temporal features driving the model output.Main resultsThe CNN model and the LDA classifier achieved comparable accuracy on the lower-dimensional dataset, but CNN exceeded LDA performance significantly on the higher-dimensional dataset (without hypothesis-driven preprocessing), achieving an average decoding accuracy of 90.7% (chance level = 8.3%). Parallel convolutions, tanh or ELU activation functions, and dropout regularization proved valuable for model performance, whereas the sequential convolutions, ReLU activation function, and batch normalization components, reduced accuracy or yielded no significant difference. Saliency maps revealed meaningful features, displaying the typical spatial distribution and latency of the P300 component expected during this task.SignificanceFollowing systematic evaluation, we provide recommendations for when and how to use CNN models in EEG decoding. Moreover, we propose a new approach for investigating the neural correlates of a cognitive task by training CNN models on raw high-dimensional EEG data and utilizing saliency maps for relevant feature extraction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document