Notice of Retraction: The Effect of Monetary Shocks on Welfare: An Econometric Investigation

Author(s):  
Xiong Lan
Keyword(s):  
2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 1140-1149
Author(s):  
Gonzalo Fernández-de-Córdoba ◽  
Jesús Vázquez

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1069-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott J. Dressler ◽  
Erasmus K. Kersting

Equilibrium indeterminacy due to economies of scale (ES) in financial intermediation is quantitatively examined in a monetary business-cycle environment. Financial intermediation provides deposits that serve as a substitute for currency to purchase consumption, and depositing decisions are susceptible to nonfundamental shocks to confidence. The analysis considers various assumptions on nominal rigidities and the timing of deposit decisions. The results suggest that indeterminacy arises for small ES, and the resulting confidence shocks qualitatively mimic monetary shocks. A calibration exercise concludes that U.S. economic volatility from this nonfundamental source has increased over time while volatility from fundamental sources has decreased.


2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 372-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burkhard Heer ◽  
Alfred Maußner

Abstract We review the labor market implications of recent real-business cycle and New Keynesian models that successfully replicate the empirical equity premium. We document the fact that all models reviewed in this article that do not feature either sticky wages or immobile labor between two production sectors as in Boldrin et al. (2001) imply a negative correlation of working hours and output that is not observed empirically. Within the class of Neo-Keynesian models, sticky prices alone are demonstrated to be less successful than rigid nominal wages with respect to the modeling of the labor market stylized facts. In addition, monetary shocks in these models are required to be much more volatile than productivity shocks to match statistics from both the asset and labor market.


2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edilean Kleber da Silva Bejarano Aragón ◽  
Marcelo Savino Portugal

In this paper, we check whether the effects of monetary policy actions on output in Brazil are asymmetric. Therefore, we estimate Markov-switching models that allow positive and negative shocks to affect the growth rate of output in an asymmetric fashion in expansion and recession states. In general, results show that: i) the real effects of negative monetary shocks are larger than those of positive shocks in an expansion; ii) in a recession, the real effects of positive and negative shocks are the same; iii) there is no evidence of asymmetry between the effects of countercyclical monetary policies; and iv) it is not possible to assert that the effects of a positive (or negative) shock are dependent upon the phase of the business cycle.


Author(s):  
Doh-Khul Kim

<p class="MsoBodyText" style="line-height: normal; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">According to a recent paper by Fisher and Huh (200</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;">2</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">), in contrast to a long-run neutrality hypothesis, nominal shocks have long-run effects on a country&rsquo;s real exchange rate</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;"> and trade balance.</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> However employing </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;">a </span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">similar method (VAR) with identical restrictions (</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;">long-run neutrality and </span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">short-run recursive</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;"> hypotheses</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">), </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;">this paper </span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">show</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;">s</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> that the effects on the real exchange rate are much shorter</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;"> in this G-7 country study</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> than what </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;">Fisher and Huh (2002) contend.</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> Further, the trade balance improves for a short period of time, from which </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;">it can</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> conclude there is a shorter existence of the depreciation effect in response to </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;">expansionary</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> monetary shocks, which supports the long-run neutrality hypothesis</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-language: KO;"> in an open macroeconomic framework</span><span style="font-size: 10pt;">.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span></span></span></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document