Data-Agnostic Local Neighborhood Generation

Author(s):  
Riccardo Guidotti ◽  
Anna Monreale
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 281 ◽  
pp. 47-50
Author(s):  
Zhi Hong Chen

In this paper we propose a new steganographic method, which based on wet paper codes and wavelet transformation. The method is designed to embed secret messages in images' wavelet coefficients and depends on images' texture characters in local neighborhood. The receivers can extract secret bits from carrier images only by some matrix multiplications without knowing the formulas written by senders, which further improves steganographic security and minimizes the impact of embedding changes. The experimental results show that our proposed method has good robust and visual concealment performance and proves out it's a practical steganographic algorithm.


2018 ◽  
Vol 78 (11) ◽  
pp. 14799-14822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soumendu Chakraborty ◽  
Satish Kumar Singh ◽  
Pavan Chakraborty

2021 ◽  
pp. 242-249
Author(s):  
M.Shahkhir Mozamir ◽  
◽  
Rohani Binti Abu Bakar ◽  
Wan Isni Soffiah Wan Din ◽  
Zalili Binti Musa

Localization is one of the important matters for Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) because various applications are depending on exact sensor nodes position. The problem in localization is the gained low accuracy in estimation process. Thus, this research is intended to increase the accuracy by overcome the problem in the Global best Local Neighborhood Particle Swarm Optimization (GbLN-PSO) to gain high accuracy. To compass this problem, an Improved Global best Local Neighborhood Particle Swarm Optimization (IGbLN-PSO) algorithm has been proposed. In IGbLN-PSO algorithm, there are consists of two phases: Exploration phase and Exploitation phase. The neighbor particles population that scattered around the main particles, help in the searching process to estimate the node location more accurately and gained lesser computational time. Simulation results demonstrated that the proposed algorithm have competence result compared to PSO, GbLN-PSO and TLBO algorithms in terms of localization accuracy at 0.02%, 0.01% and 59.16%. Computational time result shows the proposed algorithm less computational time at 80.07%, 17.73% and 0.3% compared others.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document