Intelligent cooperative behavior control of multiple partner robots

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Kubota ◽  
N. Aizawa
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Behavior ◽  
Behavior Control ◽  
Multiple Partner

Cooperative behavior control of robot group using stress antibody allotment reward

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Geun Kim ◽  
Shinya Taguchi ◽  
Su-Ill Hong ◽  
Hee-Hyol Lee
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Behavior ◽  
Behavior Control ◽  
Robot Group

An evolutionary perspective on cooperative behavior in gamers.

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 208-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grant J. Devilly ◽  
Kathleen Brown ◽  
Ivan Pickert ◽  
Riley O'Donohue
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Behavior ◽  
Evolutionary Perspective

On the New Book in Microeconomics by S. Bowles

2011 ◽  
pp. 115-121
Author(s):  
L. Polishchuk
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Behavior ◽  
Community Ownership

The paper discusses advantages and shortcomings of the Bowles book, with the emphasis on the community ownership, altruism, and cooperative behavior. The author claims that the book while being surely valuable as an academic contribution, can not, however, substitute standard textbooks in microeconomics.

The Effect of Sanctions on Cooperative Behavior: A Study on Medium Trust Individuals in the Context of Corruption

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewi Rosiana ◽  
Achmad Djunaidi ◽  
Indun Lestari Setyono ◽  
Wilis Srisayekti
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Logistic Regression Model ◽  
Cooperative Behavior ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Public Interests ◽  
The Public ◽  
Chi Square Analysis ◽  
Personal Interests

This study aims to describe the effect of sanctions (individual sanctions, collective sanctions, and absence of sanctions) on cooperative behavior of individuals with medium trust in the context of corruption. Both collective sanctions and individual sanctions, are systemic, which means sanctioning behavior is exercised not by each individual but by the system. Cooperative behavior in this context means choosing to obey rules, to reject acts of corruption and to prioritize public interests rather than the personal interests. Conversely, corruption is an uncooperative behavior to the rules, and ignores the public interest and prioritizes personal interests. Research subjects were 62 students. The Chi-Square Analysis was used to see the association between the variables and the logistic regression model was applied to describe the structure of this association. Individual sanction is recommended as punishment to medium trust individuals to promote cooperative behavior in the context of corruption. The results showed that individuals with medium trust had more cooperative behavior.

When Do Psychopathic Traits Affect Cooperative Behavior?: An Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma Experimental Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Testori ◽  
M Kempf ◽  
RB Hoyle ◽  
Hedwig Eisenbarth
Keyword(s):  
Prisoner's Dilemma ◽  
Cooperative Behavior ◽  
Prisoner’S Dilemma ◽  
Selection Procedure ◽  
Psychopathic Traits ◽  
Strong Impact ◽  
Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma ◽  
Human Decision ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Iterated Prisoner’S Dilemma

© 2019 Hogrefe Publishing. Personality traits have been long recognized to have a strong impact on human decision-making. In this study, a sample of 314 participants took part in an online game to investigate the impact of psychopathic traits on cooperative behavior in an iterated Prisoner's dilemma game. We found that disinhibition decreased the maintenance of cooperation in successive plays, but had no effect on moving toward cooperation after a previous defection or on the overall level of cooperation over rounds. Furthermore, our results underline the crucial importance of a good model selection procedure, showing how a poor choice of statistical model can provide misleading results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document