Safety issues in collaborative vehicle control

Author(s):  
N. F. Maxemchuk
Author(s):  
Anthony D. McDonald ◽  
Hananeh Alambeigi ◽  
Johan Engström ◽  
Gustav Markkula ◽  
Tobias Vogelpohl ◽  
...  

Objective: This article provides a review of empirical studies of automated vehicle takeovers and driver modeling to identify influential factors and their impacts on takeover performance and suggest driver models that can capture them. Background: Significant safety issues remain in automated-to-manual transitions of vehicle control. Developing models and computer simulations of automated vehicle control transitions may help designers mitigate these issues, but only if accurate models are used. Selecting accurate models requires estimating the impact of factors that influence takeovers. Method: Articles describing automated vehicle takeovers or driver modeling research were identified through a systematic approach. Inclusion criteria were used to identify relevant studies and models of braking, steering, and the complete takeover process for further review. Results: The reviewed studies on automated vehicle takeovers identified several factors that significantly influence takeover time and post-takeover control. Drivers were found to respond similarly between manual emergencies and automated takeovers, albeit with a delay. The findings suggest that existing braking and steering models for manual driving may be applicable to modeling automated vehicle takeovers. Conclusion: Time budget, repeated exposure to takeovers, silent failures, and handheld secondary tasks significantly influence takeover time. These factors in addition to takeover request modality, driving environment, non-handheld secondary tasks, level of automation, trust, fatigue, and alcohol significantly impact post-takeover control. Models that capture these effects through evidence accumulation were identified as promising directions for future work. Application: Stakeholders interested in driver behavior during automated vehicle takeovers may use this article to identify starting points for their work.


2005 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 50-51
Author(s):  
BRUCE JANCIN

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Ruffner ◽  
Kaleb McDowell ◽  
Victor J. Paul ◽  
Harry J. Zywiol ◽  
Todd T. Mortsfield ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Wickens ◽  
Julie Prinet ◽  
Shaun Hutchins ◽  
Nadine Sarter ◽  
Angelia Sebok

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Ryan ◽  
◽  
Megan Dove-Steinkamp ◽  
Suzanne Nobrega ◽  
Lize Tibirica ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (16) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
ELIZABETH MECHCATIE
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-26
Author(s):  
I. V. Kuznetsova

The review of the literature presents data on the possible risks of using combined hormonal contraception and the possibilities of prescribing purely progestogenic contraception as an alternative to the use of combined means. Progestogen contraceptives include a group of agents with different routes of administration, doses and characteristics of progestins, which have a number of differences in the ratio of benefits and risks, availability, reversibility and other properties of contraception. Particular attention is paid to purely progestogenic tablets containing desogestrel, as a means equivalent in effectiveness to combination contraceptives, but safer. Safety issues are considered in the context of the use of breastfeeding women, as well as from the standpoint of the risk of arterial and venous thrombosis. The issues of non-contraceptive positive effects of purely progestogenic contraceptives are covered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document