The Impact of Nonminimum-Phase Zeros on Human-in-the-Loop Control Systems

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Xingye Zhang ◽  
T. Michael Seigler ◽  
Jesse B. Hoagg
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
S. Alireza Seyyed Mousavi ◽  
Faina Matveeva ◽  
Xingye Zhang ◽  
T. Michael Seigler ◽  
Jesse B. Hoagg

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Momona Yamagami ◽  
Lauren N. Peterson ◽  
Darrin Howell ◽  
Eatai Roth ◽  
Samuel A. Burden

AbstractIn human-in-the-loop control systems, operators can learn to manually control dynamic machines with either hand using a combination of reactive (feedback) and predictive (feedforward) control. This paper studies the effect of handedness on learned controllers and performance during a continuous trajectory-tracking task. In an experiment with 18 participants, subjects perform an assay of unimanual trajectory-tracking and disturbance-rejection tasks through second-order machine dynamics, first with one hand then the other. To assess how hand preference (or dominance) affects learned controllers, we extend, validate, and apply a non-parametric modeling method to estimate the concurrent feedback and feedforward elements of subjects’ controllers. We find that handedness does not affect the learned controller and that controllers transfer between hands. Observed improvements in time-domain tracking performance may be attributed to adaptation of feedback to reject disturbances arising exogenously (i.e. applied by the experimenter) and endogenously (i.e. generated by sensorimotor noise).


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 2611-2622
Author(s):  
Mohamed A. Mabrok ◽  
Hassan K. Mohamed ◽  
Abdel-Haleem Abdel-Aty ◽  
Ahmed S. Alzahrani

2012 ◽  
Vol 220 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Sülzenbrück

For the effective use of modern tools, the inherent visuo-motor transformation needs to be mastered. The successful adjustment to and learning of these transformations crucially depends on practice conditions, particularly on the type of visual feedback during practice. Here, a review about empirical research exploring the influence of continuous and terminal visual feedback during practice on the mastery of visuo-motor transformations is provided. Two studies investigating the impact of the type of visual feedback on either direction-dependent visuo-motor gains or the complex visuo-motor transformation of a virtual two-sided lever are presented in more detail. The findings of these studies indicate that the continuous availability of visual feedback supports performance when closed-loop control is possible, but impairs performance when visual input is no longer available. Different approaches to explain these performance differences due to the type of visual feedback during practice are considered. For example, these differences could reflect a process of re-optimization of motor planning in a novel environment or represent effects of the specificity of practice. Furthermore, differences in the allocation of attention during movements with terminal and continuous visual feedback could account for the observed differences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document