Weak-anisotropy approximation for P-wave reflection coefficient at the boundary between two tilted transversely isotropic media

2016 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 485-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuriy Ivanov ◽  
Alexey Stovas
Geophysics ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 52 (12) ◽  
pp. 1654-1664 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. C. Banik

An interesting physical meaning is presented for the anisotropy parameter δ, previously introduced by Thomsen to describe weak anisotropy in transversely isotropic media. Roughly, δ is the difference between the P-wave and SV-wave anisotropies of the medium. The observed systematic depth errors in the North Sea are reexamined in view of the new interpretation of the moveout velocity through δ. The changes in δ at an interface adequately describe the effects of transverse isotropy on the P-wave reflection amplitude, The reflection coefficient expression is linearized in terms of changes in elastic parameters. The linearized expression clearly shows that it is the variation of δ at the interface that gives the anisotropic effects at small incidence angles. Thus, δ effectively describes both the moveout velocity and the reflection amplitude variation, two very important pieces of information in reflection seismic prospecting, in the presence of transverse isotropy.


Geophysics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 2129-2141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Václav Vavryuk ◽  
Ivan Peník

Approximate PP-wave reflection coefficients for weak contrast interfaces separating elastic, weakly transversely isotropic media have been derived recently by several authors. Application of these coefficients is limited because the axis of symmetry of transversely isotropic media must be either perpendicular or parallel to the reflector. In this paper, we remove this limitation by deriving a formula for the PP-wave reflection coefficient for weak contrast interfaces separating two weakly but arbitrarily anisotropic media. The formula is obtained by applying the first‐order perturbation theory. The approximate coefficient consists of a sum of the PP-wave reflection coefficient for a weak contrast interface separating two background isotropic half‐spaces and a perturbation attributable to the deviation of anisotropic half‐spaces from their isotropic backgrounds. The coefficient depends linearly on differences of weak anisotropy parameters across the interface. This simplifies studies of sensitivity of such coefficients to the parameters of the surrounding structure, which represent a basic part of the amplitude‐versus‐offset (AVO) or amplitude‐versus‐azimuth (AVA) analysis. The reflection coefficient is reciprocal. In the same way, the formula for the PP-wave transmission coefficient can be derived. The generalization of the procedure presented for the derivation of coefficients of converted waves is also possible although slightly more complicated. Dependence of the reflection coefficient on the angle of incidence is expressed in terms of three factors, as in isotropic media. The first factor alone describes normal incidence reflection. The second yields the low‐order angular variations. All three factors describe the coefficient in the whole region, in which the approximate formula is valid. In symmetry planes of weakly anisotropic media of higher symmetry, the approximate formula reduces to the formulas presented by other authors. The accuracy of the approximate formula for the PP reflection coefficient is illustrated on the model with an interface separating an isotropic half‐space from a half‐space filled by a transversely isotropic material with a horizontal axis of symmetry. The results show a very good fit with results of the exact formula, even in cases of strong anisotropy and strong velocity contrast.


Geophysics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 835-845 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Anderson ◽  
Tariq Alkhalifah ◽  
Ilya Tsvankin

The main advantage of Fowler’s dip‐moveout (DMO) method is the ability to perform velocity analysis along with the DMO removal. This feature of Fowler DMO becomes even more attractive in anisotropic media, where imaging methods are hampered by the difficulty in reconstructing the velocity field from surface data. We have devised a Fowler‐type DMO algorithm for transversely isotropic media using the analytic expression for normal‐moveout velocity. The parameter‐estimation procedure is based on the results of Alkhalifah and Tsvankin showing that in transversely isotropic media with a vertical axis of symmetry (VTI) the P‐wave normal‐moveout (NMO) velocity as a function of ray parameter can be described fully by just two coefficients: the zero‐dip NMO velocity [Formula: see text] and the anisotropic parameter η (η reduces to the difference between Thomsen parameters ε and δ in the limit of weak anisotropy). In this extension of Fowler DMO, resampling in the frequency‐wavenumber domain makes it possible to obtain the values of [Formula: see text] and η by inspecting zero‐offset (stacked) panels for different pairs of the two parameters. Since most of the computing time is spent on generating constant‐velocity stacks, the added computational effort caused by the presence of anisotropy is relatively minor. Synthetic and field‐data examples demonstrate that the isotropic Fowler DMO technique fails to generate an accurate zero‐offset section and to obtain the zero‐dip NMO velocity for nonelliptical VTI models. In contrast, this anisotropic algorithm allows one to find the values of the parameters [Formula: see text] and η (sufficient to perform time migration as well) and to correct for the influence of transverse isotropy in the DMO processing. When combined with poststack F-K Stolt migration, this method represents a complete inversion‐processing sequence capable of recovering the effective parameters of transversely isotropic media and producing migrated images for the best‐fit homogeneous anisotropic model.


Geophysics ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 1409-1425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilya Tsvankin

The angular dependence of reflection coefficients may be significantly distorted in the presence of elastic anisotropy. However, the influence of anisotropy on amplitude variation with offset (AVO) analysis is not limited to reflection coefficients. AVO signatures (e.g., AVO gradient) in anisotropic media are also distorted by the redistribution of energy along the wavefront of the wave traveling down to the reflector and back up to the surface. Significant anisotropy above the target horizon may be rather typical of sand‐shale sequences commonly encountered in AVO analysis. Here, I examine the influence of P‐ and S‐wave radiation patterns on AVO in the most common anisotropic model—transversely isotropic media. A concise analytic solution, obtained in the weak‐anisotropy approximation, provides a convenient way to estimate the impact of the distortions of the radiation patterns on AVO results. It is shown that the shape of the P‐wave radiation pattern in the range of angles most important to AVO analysis (0–40°) is primarily dependent on the difference between Thomsen parameters ε and δ. For media with ε − δ > 0 (the most common case), the P‐wave amplitude may drop substantially over the first 25–40° from vertical. There is no simple correlation between the strength of velocity anisotropy and angular amplitude variations. For instance, for models with a fixed positive ε − δ the amplitude distortions are less pronounced for larger values of ε and δ. The distortions of the SV‐wave radiation pattern are usually much more significant than those for the P‐wave. The anisotropic directivity factor for the incident wave may be of equal or greater importance for AVO than the influence of anisotropy on the reflection coefficient. Therefore, interpretation of AVO anomalies in the presence of anisotropy requires an integrated approach that takes into account not only the reflection coefficient but also the wave propagation above the reflector.


Geophysics ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. T51-T62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Hao ◽  
Alexey Stovas ◽  
Tariq Alkhalifah

Analytic representation of the offset-midpoint traveltime equation for anisotropy is very important for prestack Kirchhoff migration and velocity inversion in anisotropic media. For transversely isotropic media with a vertical symmetry axis, the offset-midpoint traveltime resembles the shape of a Cheops’ pyramid. This is also valid for homogeneous 3D transversely isotropic media with a horizontal symmetry axis (HTI). We extended the offset-midpoint traveltime pyramid to the case of homogeneous 3D HTI. Under the assumption of weak anellipticity of HTI media, we derived an analytic representation of the P-wave traveltime equation and used Shanks transformation to improve the accuracy of horizontal and vertical slownesses. The traveltime pyramid was derived in the depth and time domains. Numerical examples confirmed the accuracy of the proposed approximation for the traveltime function in 3D HTI media.


Geophysics ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 268-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilya Tsvankin

Description of reflection moveout from dipping interfaces is important in developing seismic processing methods for anisotropic media, as well as in the inversion of reflection data. Here, I present a concise analytic expression for normal‐moveout (NMO) velocities valid for a wide range of homogeneous anisotropic models including transverse isotropy with a tilted in‐plane symmetry axis and symmetry planes in orthorhombic media. In transversely isotropic media, NMO velocity for quasi‐P‐waves may deviate substantially from the isotropic cosine‐of‐dip dependence used in conventional constant‐velocity dip‐moveout (DMO) algorithms. However, numerical studies of NMO velocities have revealed no apparent correlation between the conventional measures of anisotropy and errors in the cosine‐of‐dip DMO correction (“DMO errors”). The analytic treatment developed here shows that for transverse isotropy with a vertical symmetry axis, the magnitude of DMO errors is dependent primarily on the difference between Thomsen parameters ε and δ. For the most common case, ε − δ > 0, the cosine‐of‐dip–corrected moveout velocity remains significantly larger than the moveout velocity for a horizontal reflector. DMO errors at a dip of 45 degrees may exceed 20–25 percent, even for weak anisotropy. By comparing analytically derived NMO velocities with moveout velocities calculated on finite spreads, I analyze anisotropy‐induced deviations from hyperbolic moveout for dipping reflectors. For transversely isotropic media with a vertical velocity gradient and typical (positive) values of the difference ε − δ, inhomogeneity tends to reduce (sometimes significantly) the influence of anisotropy on the dip dependence of moveout velocity.


Geophysics ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 528-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franklyn K. Levin

Assuming media having a velocity dependence on angle which is an ellipse, we have confirmed previously reported time‐distance relations for reflections from single interfaces, for reflections from sections of beds separated by horizontal interfaces, for refraction arrivals, and added the expression for diffractions. We also have derived expressions for plane‐wave reflection and transmission coefficients at an interface separating two transversely isotropic media. None of the properties differs greatly from those for isotropic media. However, velocities found from seismic surface reflections or refractions are horizontal components. There seems to be no way of obtaining vertical components of velocity from surface measurements alone and hence no way to compute depths from surface data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document