scholarly journals Bottom-up effects on top-down regulation of a floating aquatic plant by two weevil species: the context-specific nature of biological control

2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 814-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted D. Center ◽  
F. Allen Dray ◽  
Elizabeth D. Mattison ◽  
Philip W. Tipping ◽  
Min B. Rayamajhi
Ecology ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 75 (8) ◽  
pp. 2227 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. P. Gutierrez ◽  
N. J. Mills ◽  
S. J. Schreiber ◽  
C. K. Ellis

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-210
Author(s):  
Maya Rahmawati ◽  
Sidik Indra Nugraha

This study examines what strategies are most likely to be used by students when translating as well as the equivalence level of the translated texts. It aims to find out the appropriate reading strategy when translating. This study uses a qualitative paradigm because it seeks to explain a phenomenon about the choice of reading strategies used by students and the equivalence equivalence level of the translated texts. This research produces descriptive data in the form of patterns of reading strategy when students translate two different kinds of texts. In this study, data collection was carried out in two ways, namely questionnaires and translating test. Questionnaire was used to obtain data about the reading strategies chosen by students when translating. The questionnaire used is a closed type in the form of multiple choice. Each item has a different value. From the results of the analysis presented, it can be seen that most students still show a tendency to use bottom-up strategies in the process of translating. In addition, it can be seen that the choice of reading strategy can influence the results of translation. Some translations produced by students who tend to use bottom-up strategies in the translation process are not context-specific and still seem hard to read and unnatural. While around 80% of translations resulting from top-down strategies are considered acceptable because they are in accordance with the rules of the target language and sentence context. In addition, this research can also show that relying solely on one reading strategy can potentially produce erroneous translations.


BioScience ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Bunnell ◽  
Richard P. Barbiero ◽  
Stuart A. Ludsin ◽  
Charles P. Madenjian ◽  
Glenn J. Warren ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily F. Strange ◽  
Pietro Landi ◽  
Jaclyn M. Hill ◽  
Julie A. Coetzee

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renee L. Brawata

ABSTRACT The removal of apex carnivores from ecosystems can impact the abundance and diversity of species in lower trophic levels. In arid ecosystems, where “bottom up” forces of primary productivity and resource availability strongly affect trophic interactions, the role of “top down” effects is still much debated. This study explored the potential role of an apex predator, the dingo, as a “top down” trophic regulator in Australian arid ecosystems under different levels of primary productivity and dingo management regimes. Consistent with the theory of top down regulation, strong relationships were found between dingo management, dingo activity and fox activity. Dingoes appeared to suppress fox activity where dingoes were uncontrolled or only opportunistically controlled. At sites where dingoes were absent or in low numbers, fox activity was higher, and this inverse relationship persisted regardless of rainfall. The activity of rabbits and small mammals was lower where dingoes were absent and fox activity was high, while the activity of macropods was higher in the absence of dingoes. Feral cat activity did not differ significantly between sites under different dingo management or between years. These results suggest that management of dingoes is a key determinant of fox activity and the activity of some prey under varying levels of productivity. Evidence from this research showed that while the strength of trophic regulation by dingoes may fluctuate, top down effects occurred both prior to and post significant rainfall events. Following this, top down regulation of fox populations during dry periods at sites where dingoes are retained may enable higher and more stable “baseline” densities of small vertebrates, from which a larger and more rapid rate of increase of these prey during the “boom” periods can occur. Understanding the relative strength and interactions of top down and bottom up forces in regulating populations, and under what ecological states the importance of each changes, is important for the long-term conservation of biodiversity in arid regions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document