Impact on patient management of non‐mydriatic fundus photography compared to direct ophthalmoscopy in a regional Australian emergency department

Author(s):  
Hamish P Dunn ◽  
Samuel D Browning ◽  
David Thomson ◽  
William B Yates ◽  
Peter McCluskey ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Francesco Gavelli ◽  
Luigi Mario Castello ◽  
Gian Carlo Avanzi

AbstractEarly management of sepsis and septic shock is crucial for patients’ prognosis. As the Emergency Department (ED) is the place where the first medical contact for septic patients is likely to occur, emergency physicians play an essential role in the early phases of patient management, which consists of accurate initial diagnosis, resuscitation, and early antibiotic treatment. Since the issuing of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines in 2016, several studies have been published on different aspects of sepsis management, adding a substantial amount of new information on the pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis and septic shock. In light of this emerging evidence, the present narrative review provides a comprehensive account of the recent advances in septic patient management in the ED.


Injury ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 873-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.L. Lee ◽  
Colin A. Graham ◽  
Jenny M.Y. Lam ◽  
Janice H.H. Yeung ◽  
A.T. Ahuja ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 1581-1584 ◽  
Author(s):  
John S. Garrett ◽  
Colyn Berry ◽  
Hao Wong ◽  
Huanying Qin ◽  
Jeffery A. Kline

SciVee ◽  
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Praneetha Thulasi ◽  
Clare Fraser ◽  
Valarie Biousse ◽  
David Wright ◽  
Nancy Newman ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-12
Author(s):  
Mahesha H.K. Dombagolla ◽  
Joyce A. Kant ◽  
Fiona W.Y. Lai ◽  
Andreas Hendarto ◽  
David McD. Taylor

Neurology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. e373-e379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virender Sachdeva ◽  
Caroline Vasseneix ◽  
Rabih Hage ◽  
Samuel Bidot ◽  
Lindsay C. Clough ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo determine the frequency of and predictive factors for optic nerve head edema (ONHE) among patients with headache, neurologic deficit, visual loss, or elevated blood pressure in the emergency department (ED).MethodsCross-sectional analysis was done of patients with ONHE in the prospective Fundus Photography vs Ophthalmoscopy Trial Outcomes in the Emergency Department (FOTO-ED) study. Demographics, neuroimaging results, management, and patient disposition were collected. Patients in the ONHE and non-ONHE groups were compared with bivariate and logistic regression analyses.ResultsOf 1,408 patients included, 37 (2.6%, 95% confidence interval 1.9–3.6) had ONHE (median age 31 [interquartile range 26–40] years, women 27 [73%], black 28 [76%]). ONHE was bilateral in 27 of 37 (73%). Presenting complaints were headache (18 of 37), visual loss (10 of 37), acute neurologic deficit (4 of 37), elevated blood pressure (2 of 37), and multiple (3 of 37). The most common final diagnoses were idiopathic intracranial hypertension (19 of 37), CSF shunt malfunction/infection (3 of 37), and optic neuritis (3 of 37). Multivariable logistic regression found that body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 (odds ratio [OR] 1.9, p = 0.0002), younger age (OR 0.5 per 10-year increase, p < 0.0001), and visual loss (OR 5, p = 0.0002) were associated with ONHE. Patients with ONHE were more likely to be admitted (62% vs 19%), to be referred to other specialists (100% vs 54%), and to receive neuroimaging (89% vs 63%) than patients without ONHE (p < 0.001). Fundus photographs in the ED allowed initial diagnosis of ONHE for 21 of 37 (57%) patients. Detection of ONHE on ED fundus photography changed the final diagnosis for 10 patients.ConclusionsOne in 38 patients (2.6%) presenting to the ED with a chief complaint of headache, neurologic deficit, visual loss, or elevated blood pressure had ONHE. Identification of ONHE altered patient disposition and contributed to the final diagnosis, confirming the importance of funduscopic examination in the ED.


2018 ◽  
pp. bcr-2018-226613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Iwai ◽  
Kenichi Tetsuhara ◽  
Eiki Ogawa ◽  
Mitsuru Kubota

Anchoring bias is one of the most common diagnostic biases that may lead to closed-minded thinking and could result in unnecessary tests, inappropriate patient management and even misdiagnosis. A 4-year-old boy was brought to the emergency department because of shaking chills. On the basis of bilateral swollen preauricular areas, high level of serum amylase and the prevalence of mumps, he initially received a diagnosis of mumps in spite of the shaking chills. However, blood culture turned out to be positive for two different kinds of bacteria. The patient finally received a diagnosis of polymicrobial bacteraemia resulting from suppurative appendicitis. We must consider and rule out bacteraemia in the differential diagnosis for patients who present with shaking chills, even in the presence of symptoms or information consistent with a more common viral infection such as mumps. In addition, intra-abdominal infection should be ruled out in the presence of polymicrobial enterobacteriaceae bacteraemia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document