Indicators of success for smart law enforcement in protected areas: A case study for Russian Amur tiger (Panthera tigris altaica) reserves

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michiel H. H. HÖTTE ◽  
Igor A. KOLODIN ◽  
Sergei L. BEREZNUK ◽  
Jonathan C. SLAGHT ◽  
Linda L. KERLEY ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison M. Lee ◽  
Naomi Guppy ◽  
John Bainbridge ◽  
Hanne Jahns

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. e110811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Gilbert ◽  
Dale G. Miquelle ◽  
John M. Goodrich ◽  
Richard Reeve ◽  
Sarah Cleaveland ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 834-847 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. V. Rozhnov ◽  
J. A. Hernandez-Blanco ◽  
V. S. Lukarevskiy ◽  
S. V. Naidenko ◽  
P. A. Sorokin ◽  
...  

Animals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1536
Author(s):  
Jake Stuart Veasey

The ecology of large, wide-ranging carnivores appears to make them vulnerable to conservation challenges in the wild and welfare challenges in captivity. This poses an ethical dilemma for the zoo community and supports the case that there is a need to reconsider prevailing management paradigms for these species in captivity. Whilst the welfare challenges wide ranging carnivores face have been attributed to reduced ranging opportunities associated with the decreased size of captive habitats, attempts to augment wild carnivore welfare in captivity typically focus on behaviours linked to hunting. Thus far, this has yet to result in the systematic elimination of signs of compromised welfare amongst captive carnivores. Here an assessment is carried out to identify the likely welfare priorities for Amur tigers, which, as one of the widest ranging terrestrial carnivores, serves as an excellent exemplar for species experiencing extreme compression of their ranging opportunities in captivity. These priorities are then used to consider novel strategies to address the welfare challenges associated with existing management paradigms, and in particular, attempt to overcome the issue of restricted space. The insights generated here have wider implications for other species experiencing substantive habitat compression in captivity. It is proposed here that the impact of habitat compression on captive carnivore welfare may not be a consequence of the reduction in habitat size per se, but rather the reduction in cognitive opportunities that likely covary with size, and that this should inform strategies to augment welfare.


2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 567-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-Hui Wu ◽  
Yan-Le Lei ◽  
Sheng-Guo Fang ◽  
Qiu-Hong Wan

mBio ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen A. Terio ◽  
Meggan E. Craft

ABSTRACTOne of the greatest threats to the conservation of wild cat populations may be dogs or, at least, one of their viruses. Canine distemper virus (CDV), a single-stranded RNA virus in theParamyxoviridaefamily and genusMorbillivirus, infects and causes disease in a variety of species, not just canids. An outbreak of CDV in wild lions in the Serengeti, Tanzania, in 1994 was a wake-up call for conservationists, as it demonstrated that an infectious disease could swiftly impact a previously healthy felid population. To understand how this virus causes disease in noncanid hosts, researchers have focused on specific mutations in the binding site of the CDV hemagglutinin gene. Now, Seimon et al. provide information on CDV in its latest feline victim, the endangered wild Amur tiger (Panthera tigris altaica) [T. A. Seimon et al., mBio 4(4):e00410-13, 2013, doi:10.1128/mBio.00410-13]. Their findings of CDV strains infecting tigers, in combination with recent information from other felids, paints a different picture, one in which CDV strains from a variety of geographic lineages and with a variety of amino acid residues in the hemagglutinin gene binding site can infect cats and cause disease. Although CDV has been known as a multihost disease since its discovery in domestic dogs in 1905, perhaps it is time to reconsider whether these noncanid species are not just incidental or “spillover” hosts but, rather, a normal part of the complex ecology of this infectious disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e001081
Author(s):  
Julio A Mercado ◽  
Jacobo Romano ◽  
Horacio De la Cueva ◽  
Paulina Haro

Tiletamine-zolazepam immobilisation use in tigers is controversial and has been associated with neurological diseases, poor recoveries and death. Recent publications show this controversy is unsubstantiated. The multiple use of the tiletamine-zolazepam-xylazine (TZ-XZ) combination in a 33-kg Amur tiger (Panthera tigris altaica) cub without adverse reactions is described. The physiological values were not statistically different between anaesthetic events and were comparable with those observed with other protocols. No renal, hepatic or neurological functions were affected during the 10 anaesthetic events over the course of five months. The TZ-XZ (1–1.5 mg/kg + 0.5–1 mg/kg) combination proved to be safe for use in this tiger during repeated immobilisations. The tiger was healthy at the time of the paper’s submission. Further studies with a larger population of animals are encouraged.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document