Minimally invasive techniques for medically inoperable stage 1 non small cell lung cancer: Radiotherapy is still the gold standard

2014 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-134
Author(s):  
ML Yap ◽  
SK Vinod ◽  
GP Delaney
Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Pagni ◽  
Umberto Malapelle ◽  
Claudio Doglioni ◽  
Gabriella Fontanini ◽  
Filippo Fraggetta ◽  
...  

A meeting among expert pathologists was held in 2019 in Rome to verify the results of the previous harmonization efforts on the PD-L1 immunohistochemical testing by scoring a representative series of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) digital slides. The current paper shows the results of this digital experimental meeting and the expertise achieved by the community of Italian pathologists. PD-L1 protein expression was determined using tumor proportion score (TPS), i.e., the percentage of viable tumor cells showing partial or complete membrane staining at any intensity. The gold standard was defined as the final PD-L1 score formulated by a panel of seven lung committed pathologists. PD-L1 status was clustered in three categories, namely negative (TPS < 1), low (TPS 1–49%), and high (TPS ≥ 50%). In 23 cases (71.9%) PD-L1 staining was performed using the companion diagnostic 22C3 pharmDx kit on Dako Autostainer, while in nine (28.1%) cases it was performed using the SP263 Ventana kit on BenchMark platform. A complete PD-L1 scoring agreement between the panel of experts and the participants was reached in 57.1% of cases, whereas a minor disagreement in 16.1% of cases was recorded. Italian pathologists performed best in strong positive cases (i.e., tumor proportion score TPS > 50%), whereas only 10.8% of disagreement with the gold standard was observed, and 55.6% regarded a single challenging case. The worst performance was achieved in the negative cases, with 32.0% disagreement. A significant difference resulted from the analysis of the data separated by the different clones used: 22.3% and 38.1% disagreement (p = 0.01) was found in the group of cases analyzed by 22C3 and SP263 antibody clones, respectively. In conclusion, this workshop record proposed the application of a digital pathology platform to share controversial cases in educational meetings as an alternative possibility for improving the interpretation and reporting of specific histological tools. Due to the crucial role of PD-L1 TPS for the selection of patients for immunotherapy, the identification of unconventional approaches as virtual slides to focus experiences and give more detailed practical verifications of the standard quality reached may be a considerable option.


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia L. Harris ◽  
Eric M. Toloza ◽  
Jason B. Klapman ◽  
Shivakumar Vignesh ◽  
Kathryn Rodriguez ◽  
...  

CHEST Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (4) ◽  
pp. A1463
Author(s):  
Nirosshan Thiruchelvam ◽  
Yash Sarda ◽  
Xiaozhen Han ◽  
Xiaofeng Wang ◽  
Peter Mazzone

2011 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. AB168
Author(s):  
James P. Callaway ◽  
Ashutosh Tamhane ◽  
Gurudatta Naik ◽  
Ayesha S. Bryant ◽  
Whitney Jennings ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7539-7539
Author(s):  
Apar Kishor Ganti ◽  
Christina D. Williams ◽  
Ajeet Gajra ◽  
Michael J. Kelley

7539 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is considered standard of care in patients with resected stages 2 and 3 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However data regarding its utility in older patients are sparse. This analysis was conducted to evaluate the role of AC in older patients with early stage NSCLC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with stages 1-3 NSCLC between 2001 and 2008 in the VA Central Cancer Registry. Patients were divided into two groups based on age: <70 yrs and ≥70 yrs. Descriptive statistics were used to examine patterns of AC use and to obtain survival rates associated with use of AC in the two age groups. Chi-square was used to compare distributions. Results: Of the 10,036 patients who underwent surgical resection, 3958 (39.4%) were ≥70 yrs, while 6078 were <70 yrs old. Overall, 11.2% of older patients (6.3% - stage 1, 21% - stage 2, 26.2% - stage 3) and 22.3% of younger pts (11.6% - stage 1, 41.1% - stage 2, 47.1% - stage 3) received AC. Of the patients who received AC, a greater proportion of younger patients received platinum-based AC (91.8 vs 86.4% vs; p=0.0008). Also, in each stage younger patients had a better 3 yr overall survival (OS) (Stage 1-69.2 vs 58%, stage 2 – 52.8 vs 39.1%, stage 3 – 42.5 vs 33.7%). Younger patients with stages 2 and 3 NSCLC who received AC had improved 3 yr OS (58.8 vs 48.6%; p=0.0009 and 48.8 vs 36.9%; p=0.0002 respectively). There was no difference in 3 yr OS for older patients based on AC when all stages were included. For patients with stages 2 and 3, a larger proportion of younger patients received cisplatin-based AC (11.3 vs 3.5%). Older patients with stages 2 and 3, who received cisplatin-based AC had a better 3 yr OS compared to those who received carboplatin-based AC or no AC (55.3 vs 42.2 vs 35.3% respectively; p=0.01). Similarly cisplatin-based AC had an improved 3 yr OS in younger patients with stages 2 and 3 NSCLC (61.4 vs 52 vs 43.4% respectively; p=0.0001). Conclusions: This analysis suggests that older patients do not benefit from AC after resection of stage 1-3 NSCLC to the same degree as younger patients. This differential effect may be due to less common use of cisplatin among older patients. Multivariate analyses are planned.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document