Health-Care Costs: Discussion of “The Impact of Changes in Regulation on Cost Behavior”

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 567-574
Author(s):  
Eva Labro
2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruna Camilo Turi ◽  
Henrique Luiz Monteiro ◽  
Rômulo Araújo Fernandes ◽  
Jamile Sanches Codogno

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Demont ◽  
A Bourmaud ◽  
A Kechichian ◽  
F Desmeules

Abstract Background Although the benefits of physiotherapy is well supported in the literature, the impact of having direct access to physiotherapy is not well established. Update of the current available evidence is warranted. The aim of this systematic review was to update the current evidence regarding the impact of direct access physiotherapy compared to usual care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Methods Systematic searches were conducted in 5 bibliographic databases up until May 2018. Two independent raters reviewed studies and used the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies to conduct the methodological quality assessment and a data extraction regarding patient outcomes, adverse events, health care utilization and processes, patient satisfaction and health care costs. Results Sixteen studies of weak to moderate quality were included. Five studies found no significant differences in pain reduction between usual family physician led care and direct access physiotherapy. However, three studies reported better clinical outcomes in patients with direct access in terms of function and quality of life. Five studies did not observe any adverse events with direct access physiotherapy. Three studies showed shorter waiting time and four studies reported fewer number of physiotherapy visits with direct access. Three studies showed that patients with direct access were less likely to have medication and imaging tests prescribed compared to usual care. Five studies reported higher levels of satisfaction for direct access. In terms of health care costs, four studies demonstrated that costs were lower with direct access and one study reported similar costs between both types of care. Conclusions Emerging evidence, although of weak to moderate quality, suggest that direct access physiotherapy provides equal or better outcomes than family physician led care models for musculoskeletal disorders patients. More methodologically strong studies are needed. Key messages This review supports the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of direct access PT, while increasing access to care with a more efficient use of resources. There is a need for more methodologically strong studies to evaluate the efficiency of direct access models of care of physiotherapy for patients with MSKD.


2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. A100-A101
Author(s):  
MS Duh ◽  
JF Fowler ◽  
L Rovba ◽  
S Buteau ◽  
L Pinheiro ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 939-947 ◽  
Author(s):  
John S. Sampalis ◽  
Moishe Liberman ◽  
Stephane Auger ◽  
Nicolas V. Christou

2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (12) ◽  
pp. 1006-1010
Author(s):  
Megan McHugh ◽  
Dustin D. French ◽  
Mary M. Kwasny ◽  
Claude R. Maechling ◽  
Jane L. Holl

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsen Bayati ◽  
Khosro Keshavarz ◽  
Farhad Lotfi ◽  
Abbas KebriaeeZadeh ◽  
Omid Barati ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Family physician program (FPP) and health transformation plan (HTP) are two major reforms that have been implemented in Iran's health system in recent. The present study was aimed at evaluating the impact of these two reforms on the level of service utilization and cost of health care services. Methods: This longitudinal study was conducted on people insured by social security organization in Fars province during 2009-2016. The data on the utilization of services and costs of general practitioner visits, specialist visits, medications, imaging, laboratory tests, and hospitalization were collected. Interrupted time series analysis was used to analyze the effect of the two mentioned reforms. Results: FPP resulted in a significant reduction in the number of specialist visits, imaging, and laboratory tests in the short term, and in the number of radiology services, laboratory tests, and hospitalization in the long term. In contrast, HTP significantly increased the utilization of radiology services and laboratory tests both in the short term and long term. Concerning the costs, FPP resulted in a reduction in costs in short and long term except general practitioners' and specialist visit, and medication in long term. However, HTP resulted in an increase in health care costs in both of the studied time periods. Conclusions: FPP has been successful in rationalizing the utilization of services. On the other hand, HTP has improved people’s access to services by increasing the utilization; but it has increased health care costs. Therefore, policymakers must adopt an agenda to revise and re-design the plan.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document