Fall risk assessment tools for use among older adults in long-term care settings: A systematic review of the literature

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Nunan ◽  
Christine Brown Wilson ◽  
Timothy Henwood ◽  
Deborah Parker
2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-246
Author(s):  
Anat Glass ◽  
Gad Mendelson ◽  
Merav Ben Natan

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to compare the ability of the Morse Fall Scale (MFS) and Farmer's fall-risk assessment tool (FFAT) to identify correlations between risk factors and falls among older adult long-term care (LTC) facility residents.Design/methodology/approachThis was a correlational retrospective study. 200 medical records of older adults hospitalized in a LTC facility in central Israel, from January 2017 to January 2018, were examined.FindingsOf all the residents, 75% and 99.5% of the residents were identified as having a high fall risk according to the MFS and FFAT, respectively. Only 12.5% of residents actually fell. MFS score was weakly correlated with actual falls (odds ratio = 1.035). It was also found that all fallers fell during their first week at the facility.Research limitations/implicationsFuture research should explore the ability of the tools to capture changes in the fall risk by repeat assessments, as this has not been examined in the present study.Practical implicationsThe MFS and FFAT tool may have little value in assessing fall risk in older adult LTC facility residents. Therefore, nurses should perform a clinical evaluation of each individual patient. In addition, nurses should place a particular emphasis on fall risk and prevention during the first week following admission.Originality/valueThe findings of the present study raise doubts regarding the utility of the common practice of assessing fall risk in older adult LTC facility residents using the tools MFS and the FFAT, thus emphasizing the need to adopt a different approach.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcello Ruggieri ◽  
Biagio Palmisano ◽  
Giancarlo Fratocchi ◽  
Valter Santilli ◽  
Roberta Mollica ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 525-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selina Chow ◽  
Ronald Chow ◽  
Michael Lam ◽  
Leigha Rowbottom ◽  
Drew Hollenberg ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 992-999
Author(s):  
Iria Dobarrio-Sanz ◽  
José Manuel Hernández-Padilla ◽  
María Mar López-Rodríguez ◽  
Cayetano Fernández-Sola ◽  
José Granero-Molina ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Da Eun Kim ◽  
Hyang Kim ◽  
Junghee Hyun ◽  
Hyojin Lee ◽  
Hyehyun Sung ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 1041-1052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa Dever Fitzgerald ◽  
Thomas Hadjistavropoulos ◽  
Jaime Williams ◽  
Lisa Lix ◽  
Sharmeen Zahir ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keeley Farrell ◽  
Jennifer Horton

The results of 1 systematic review suggest that supplementation with vitamin D may provide some benefit for cancer-related mortality in older adults. It is unclear whether there is a benefit of vitamin D supplementation for all-cause mortality; however, no benefit was found for cardiovascular disease mortality, cardiovascular disease events, or cancer incidence. There is limited and mixed evidence on the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation for dementia and mild cognitive impairment in older adults. The results of 1 systematic review suggest that vitamin D supplementation may provide protection against acute respiratory infections in the overall population; however, this result was not significant in the subgroup of patients older than 65 years. No evidence-based guidelines were identified regarding vitamin D supplementation for the prevention and/or treatment of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and other conditions in elderly patients residing in long-term care facilities.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alba DiCenso

To report quantitative evidence of the effectiveness of advanced practice nursing roles, clinical nurse specialists and nurse practitioners, in meeting the healthcare needs of older adults living in long-term care residential settings. Although studies have examined the effectiveness of advanced practice nurses in this setting, a systematic review of this evidence has not been conducted. Quantitative systematic review. Twelve electronic databases were searched (1966-2010); leaders in the field were contacted; and personal files, reference lists, pertinent journals, and websites were searched for prospective studies with a comparison group. Studies that met inclusion criteria were reviewed for quality, using a modified version of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group risk of bias assessment criteria. Four prospective studies conducted in the USA and reported in 15 papers were included. Long-term care settings with advanced practice nurses had lower rates of depression, urinary incontinence, pressure ulcers, restraint use, and aggressive behaviours; more residents who experienced improvements in meeting personal goals; and family members who expressed more satisfaction with medical services. Advanced practice nurses are associated with improvements in several measures of health status and behaviours of older adults in long-term care settings and in family satisfaction. Further exploration is needed to determine the effect of advanced practice nurses on health services use; resident satisfaction with care and quality of life; and the skills, quality of care, and job satisfaction of healthcare staff.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document