Transient elevation in serum carcinoembryonic antigen while on adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer: Is this of prognostic importance?

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. e124-e131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Lawrence ◽  
Victoria Hinder ◽  
Melissa Murray ◽  
Jerome Macapagal ◽  
Paul Thompson ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 821-829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heita Ozawa ◽  
Kenjiro Kotake ◽  
Miki Hosaka ◽  
Akira Hirata ◽  
Yusuke Nakagawa ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4069-4069
Author(s):  
Masahito Kotaka ◽  
Dai Manaka ◽  
Tetsuya Eto ◽  
Junichi Hasegawa ◽  
Akinori Takagane ◽  
...  

4069 Background: ACHIEVE, as part of the IDEA collaboration, was a multicenter trial randomizing patients with stage 3 resected colon cancer to either 3 versus 6 months of adjuvant FOLFOX/CAPOX. We previously reported that the hazard ratios (HRs) in disease-free survival (DFS) of 3 versus 6 months duration according to risk stage (low-risk [T1-3 and N1] or high-risk [T4 or N2]) and regimen (FOLFOX or CAPOX) as well as in overall population were consistent with those observed in the whole IDEA. This study aimed to clarify the significance of post-operative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) on DFS in stage 3 colon cancer. Methods: Eligibility included post-operative serum CEA value of ≤10 ng/ml at registration in the ACHIEVE trial, which enrolled 1313 patients between 2012 and 2014, out of whom 1291 pts were the modified ITT (mITT) population and used in this study. The cutoff values of CEA analyzed for prognostic analyses were the median value (1.8 ng/ml) in the mITT, the upper limit of normal (ULN) level (5.0 ng/ml), and the half of ULN (2.5 ng/ml). The association of post-operative CEA with DFS were measured by Cox regression analyses. Results: Of the 3 cutoff values, the ULN (5.0 ng/ml) was associated with DFS more strongly than the median (1.8 ng/ml) or half of ULN (2.5 ng/ml), with a HR of 1.75 (95%CI, 1.24-2.46) (Table). The 99 patients (7.7%) were identified as the CEA > ULN and 1192 (92.3%) as < ULN. In univariate analysis, regimen (CAPOX or FOLFOX), ECOG PS (0 or 1), T factor (T1-3 or T4), N factor (N1 or N2-3) and CEA ( < ULN or > ULN) were significantly associated with DFS. Multivariate Cox regression identified CEA > ULN as an independent poor risk factor (HR = 1.45; 95%CI, 1.03-2.05). Shorter DFS in patients with CEA > ULN than in those with CEA < ULN was consistently observed in each subgroup of baseline factors, including treatment duration, regimen, age, gender, PS, T-stage, N-stage, no of lymph nodes examined, and tumor location; no interaction was observed between CEA and these factors. Conclusions: Post-operative serum CEA is also a strong prognostic factor for DFS in stage 3 colon cancer. Clinical trial information: 000008543 . [Table: see text]


JAMA Oncology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsuyoshi Konishi ◽  
Yoshifumi Shimada ◽  
Meier Hsu ◽  
Lauren Tufts ◽  
Rosa Jimenez-Rodriguez ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 654-654
Author(s):  
Nicola Jane Mitchell ◽  
Victoria Hinder ◽  
Melissa Murray ◽  
Jerome Macapagal ◽  
Paul Ivan Thompson ◽  
...  

654 Background: Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) is used to monitor response to treatment in metastatic colon cancer. Transient surges in CEA can occur after initiation of chemotherapy and are not associated with worse outcome. There is little data on transient CEA surge in the adjuvant setting. We aimed to review patterns of change in CEA levels with adjuvant chemotherapy and investigate associations between transient rises and patient survival. Methods: A retrospective review of patients in Auckland with a new diagnosis of colon cancer in 2001 or 2005 was reported previously [Murray, NZMJ, 2011]. CEA results immediately pre-chemotherapy, during and up to 9 months post chemotherapy were collected and death data was updated. Increase in CEA during chemotherapy was measured as the maximum change from baseline; values more than 2 (within-person) standard deviations above baseline [Erden, Scand, J Clin Lab Inv, 2008] were classified as increased. An increase was transient if the last recorded CEA post chemotherapy was within 2 sd of baseline. Three patient groups were defined: NI (no increase in CEA); TI (transient increase in CEA); and CI (continuous increase in CEA). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate 5-year survival; Cox regression and log-rank p-values were used to compare survival. Results: Of the 77 patients identified with stage II or III disease who had received adjuvant chemotherapy, 61 had sufficient CEA data to be included. The TI group were younger (median [quartiles]: TI 59 [54, 64]; NI 65 [53, 74]; CI 68 [62, 74]) but a greater proportion were stage II (TI 32%; NI 23%; CI 17%). Patients were followed up for a minimum of 7.3 years (or death). Number of deaths per group were: TI 3/19; NI 9/30; CI 7/12. The 5 year overall survival was: TI 95%; NI 83%; CI 42%. There was no significant difference between TI and NI (p = 0.1), but the confidence interval was wide (HR 0.3; 95% CI (0.07 to 1.5). For CI compared to NI, the HR was 2.8 (95% CI (1.0 to 7.6), p = 0.04). Conclusions: The observation that CEA surge does not signal poorer prognosis will be further examined as part of a separate population-based New Zealand-wide study of colorectal cancer diagnosis, treatment and outcome. Part funded by a Genesis Oncology Trust grant.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document