scholarly journals P76: Long‐term oral prednisolone exposure in primary care for bullous pemphigoid: a population‐based study

2021 ◽  
Vol 185 (S1) ◽  
pp. 62-62
2021 ◽  
pp. BJGP.2020.0870
Author(s):  
Monica SM Persson ◽  
Karen E Harman ◽  
Kim S Thomas ◽  
Joanne Chalmers ◽  
Yana Vinogradova ◽  
...  

Background: Oral prednisolone is the mainstay treatment for bullous pemphigoid, an auto-immune blistering skin disorder affecting older people. Moderate to high dose treatment is often initiated in secondary care, but then continued in primary care. Aim: To describe long-term oral prednisolone prescribing in UK primary care for adults with bullous pemphigoid 1998-2017. Design and setting: A prospective cohort study using routinely collected data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a primary care database containing the healthcare records for over 17 million people in the UK. Method: Oral prednisolone exposure was characterised in terms of the proportion of individuals with incident bullous pemphigoid prescribed oral prednisolone following their diagnosis and the duration and dose of prednisolone. Results: 2,312 (69.6%) of 3,322 people with bullous pemphigoid were prescribed oral prednisolone in primary care. The median duration of exposure was 10.6 months (IQR 3.4 to 24.0). Of prednisolone users, 71.5% were continuously exposed for >3 months, 39.8% for >1 year, 14.7% for >3 years, 5.0% for >5 years, and 1.7% for >10 years. The median cumulative dose was 2,974mg (IQR 1,059 to 6,456). Maximum daily doses were ≥10mg/day in 74.4% of users, ≥20mg/day in 40.7%, ≥30mg/day in 18.2%, ≥40mg/day in 6.6%, ≥50mg/day in 3.8%, and ≥60mg/day in 1.9%. Conclusions: A high proportion of people with incident bullous pemphigoid are treated with oral prednisolone in UK primary care. Primary and secondary care should address steroid-sparing alternatives and, where switching is not possible, ensure prophylactic treatments and proactive monitoring of potential side-effects are in place.


VASA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soumia Taimour ◽  
Moncef Zarrouk ◽  
Jan Holst ◽  
Olle Melander ◽  
Gunar Engström ◽  
...  

Abstract. Background: Biomarkers reflecting diverse pathophysiological pathways may play an important role in the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysm (aortic diameter ≥30 mm, AAA), levels of many biomarkers are elevated and correlated to aortic diameter among 65-year-old men undergoing ultrasound (US) screening for AAA. Probands and methods: To evaluate potential relationships between biomarkers and aortic dilatation after long-term follow-up, levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), proneurotensin (PNT), copeptin (CPT), lipoprotein-associated phospholipase 2 (Lp-PLA2), cystatin C (Cyst C), midregional proatrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), and midregional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) were measured in 117 subjects (114 [97 %] men) aged 47–49 in a prospective population-based cohort study, and related to aortic diameter at US examination of the aorta after 14–19 years of follow-up. Results: Biomarker levels at baseline did not correlate with aortic diameter after 14–19 years of follow up (CRP [r = 0.153], PNT [r = 0.070], CPT [r = –.156], Lp-PLA2 [r = .024], Cyst C [r = –.015], MR-proANP [r = 0.014], MR-proADM [r = –.117]). Adjusting for age and smoking at baseline in a linear regression model did not reveal any significant correlations. Conclusions: Tested biomarker levels at age 47–49 were not associated with aortic diameter at ultrasound examination after 14–19 years of follow-up. If there are relationships between these biomarkers and aortic dilatation, they are not relevant until closer to AAA diagnosis.


Author(s):  
Alireza Khajavi ◽  
Seyed Saeed Tamehri Zadeh ◽  
Fereidoun Azizi ◽  
Robert D. Brook ◽  
Hengameh Abdi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milad Fahim ◽  
Lea M. Dijksman ◽  
Thijs A. Burghgraef ◽  
Paul B. van der Nat ◽  
Wouter J.M. Derksen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2685
Author(s):  
Andre J. Burnham ◽  
Phillip A. Burnham ◽  
Edwin M. Horwitz

Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a rare neuroepithelial-derived malignancy that usually presents in the nasal cavity. The rarity of ONB has led to conflicting reports regarding associations of patient age and ONB survival and outcome. Moreover, long-term outcomes of chemotherapy and other treatment modalities are speculated. Here, we aimed to compare survival outcomes across age groups through time and determine associations between treatment modality and survival. In this retrospective population-based study, we analyzed the SEER 2000–2016 Database for patients with ONB tumors. Using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, a significant effect of age and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was observed; geriatric ONB patients had the lowest CSS overall. Generalized linear models and survival analyses demonstrated that CSS of the pediatric patient population was similar to the geriatric group through 100 months but plateaued thereafter and was the highest of all age groups. Radiation and surgery were associated with increased CSS, while chemotherapy was associated with decreased CSS. GLM results showed that tumor grade, stage and lymph node involvement had no CSS associations with age or treatment modality. Our results provide insight for future investigations of long-term outcomes associated with ONB patient age and treatment modality, and we conclude that survival statistics of ONB patients should be analyzed in terms of trends through time rather than fixed in time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document