Seasonal isotopic niche of a rodent: High between‐individual variation but no changes in individual niche width during the rich‐resource period

Biotropica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nícholas F. Camargo ◽  
Guilherme G. Reis ◽  
Anna Carla L. Camargo ◽  
Gabriela B. Nardoto ◽  
Jamie M. Kneitel ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 492-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lúcia Mateus ◽  
Jean Ortega ◽  
Angélica Mendes ◽  
Jerry Penha

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 356-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brock Geary ◽  
Scott T Walter ◽  
Paul L Leberg ◽  
Jordan Karubian

Abstract The degree to which foraging individuals are able to appropriately modify their behaviors in response to dynamic environmental conditions and associated resource availability can have important fitness consequences. Despite an increasingly refined understanding of differences in foraging behavior between individuals, we still lack detailed characterizations of within-individual variation over space and time, and what factors may drive this variability. From 2014 to 2017, we used GPS transmitters and accelerometers to document foraging movements by breeding adult Brown Pelicans (Pelecanus occidentalis) in the northern Gulf of Mexico, where the prey landscape is patchy and dynamic at various scales. Assessments of traditional foraging metrics such as trip distance, linearity, or duration did not yield significant relationships between individuals. However, we did observe lower site fidelity and less variation in energy expenditure in birds of higher body condition, despite a population-level trend of increased fidelity as the breeding season progressed. These findings suggest that high-quality individuals are both more variable and more efficient in their foraging behaviors during a period of high energetic demand, consistent with a “rich get richer” scenario in which individuals in better condition are able to invest in more costly behaviors that provide higher returns. This work highlights the importance of considering behavioral variation at multiple scales, with particular reference to within-individual variation, to improve our understanding of foraging ecology in wild populations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rogério L. Ferreira ◽  
Filipe R. Ceia ◽  
Teresa C. Borges ◽  
Jaime A. Ramos ◽  
Alan B. Bolten

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devin L. Johnson ◽  
Michael T. Henderson ◽  
David L. Anderson ◽  
Travis L. Booms ◽  
Cory T. Williams

Abstract Intra- and inter-specific resource partitioning within predator communities is a fundamental component of trophic ecology, and one proposed mechanism for how populations partition resources is through individual niche variation. The Niche Variation Hypothesis (NVH) predicts that interindividual trait variation leads to functional trade-offs in foraging efficiency, resulting in populations comprised of individual dietary specialists. A modified version of the NVH [mNVH] predicts niche specialization is plastic and responsive to fluctuating resource availability. We quantified niche overlap and tested the mNVH within an Arctic raptor guild, focusing on three species that employ different foraging strategies: Golden Eagles (generalists); Gyrfalcons (facultative specialists); and Rough-legged Hawks (specialists). Tundra ecosystems exhibit cyclic populations of arvicoline rodents (lemmings and voles), providing a unique system under which to examine interannual fluctuations in predator resource availability. Using blood δ13C & δ15N values from 189 raptor nestlings on Alaska’s Seward Peninsula (2014–2019), we calculated isotopic niche width and used Bayesian stable isotope mixing models (BSIMMs) to characterize individual specialization and test the mNVH. We observed a high degree of isotopic niche overlap between the three species and variable trophic responses to different stages of the arvicoline rodent cycle. Elevated arvicoline rodent abundance corresponded to reduced niche overlap among species and increased individual specialization in Golden Eagles and Gyrfalcons. Further, Gyrfalcons displayed a positive relationship between individual specialization and population niche width on an interannual basis consistent with the mNVH. Our findings suggest plasticity in niche specialization may reduce intra- and inter-specific resource competition under dynamic ecological conditions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 904-915 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl J. Reddin ◽  
John H. Bothwell ◽  
Nessa E. O'Connor ◽  
Chris Harrod

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn Dsouza ◽  
Chetan Rao ◽  
Muralidharan Manoharakrishnan ◽  
Kartik Shanker

Abstract Species interactions are central to community assembly and ecosystem functioning. Sea snakes play an important role as mesopredators and as intermediate links in coastal marine food webs. However, they are impacted by anthropogenic pressures such as fisheries throughout their range. We investigated differences in resource use between two sympatric sea snake species from the west coast of India, Hydrophis curtus and H. schistosus, and described the impacts of fishing on the interactions of these species. We compared habitat use, diet, and isotopic niche width between species to determine resource overlap. We then compared trophic overlap of each species with the fisheries in the region and tested the effect of fishing intensity on their isotopic niche width. We found that H. curtus used deeper habitats than H. schistosus, resulting in increased spatial overlap with fisheries. The two species also had distinct trophic niches and H. curtus prey formed a larger proportion of fishery catch on average than H. schistosus. This greater overlap could make H. curtus more vulnerable to the effects of fisheries. Both species exhibited expansion in short-term and long-term isotopic niche width along a gradient of fishing intensity which may indicate behavioural changes associated with the presence of fisheries. Hydrophis curtus is a trophic generalist, competes with syntopic species and is dominant in most assemblages. However, H. schistosus exhibits higher plasticity in resource use and may have an advantage over H. curtus. Thus, fishing could alter the relative abundance of these mesopredators with cascading effects through coastal food webs.


2014 ◽  
Vol 161 (8) ◽  
pp. 1861-1872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filipe R. Ceia ◽  
Vitor H. Paiva ◽  
Stefan Garthe ◽  
João C. Marques ◽  
Jaime A. Ramos

2019 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 1213-1219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emre Yemisken ◽  
Joan Navarro ◽  
Manuela Forero ◽  
Persefoni Megalofonou ◽  
Lutfiye Eryilmaz

AbstractWe examined the feeding ecology (diet, trophic width and trophic position) of five demersal shark species (Mustelus mustelus Linnaeus, 1758, Galeus melastomus Rafinesque, 1810, Scyliorhinus canicula Linnaeus, 1758, Scyliorhinus stellaris Linnaeus, 1758, Squalus blainville, Risso, 1826) coexisting in the north-eastern Aegean Sea (around Gökçeda Island) by combining stomach content and stable isotope analyses. The results indicate clear differences in diet between the five sharks. Cephalopods were mainly found in diet of S. stellaris and M. mustelus and the stomachs of G. melastomus, S. canicula and S. blainville included fish. S. blainville showed the highest trophic position in respect of stable isotope analysis (TPsia = 4.89) around Gökçeada Island. It was followed by G. melastomus (TPsia = 4.57). Direct isotopic values (both stable nitrogen and carbon) and isotopic niche width based on the Standard Ellipse Area (SEA) clearly differed among the five shark species. In particular, S. blainville was isotopically segregated from the other shark species studied, showing a narrow isotopic trophic niche and higher trophic level. In contrast, M. mustelus had the widest trophic niche of the five species studied. The niche width of S. stellaris was narrower than M. mustelus and S. canicula but wider than S. blainville and G. melastomus. SEA showed that G. melastomus has a specialized feeding strategy in the area. There is no overlap between S. canicula and S. stellaris in trophic width.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document