Thermolyses of epimeric 3-alkyl-2-phenyloxetanes (1c, 1t, 2c, 2t, 3c, and 3t), 3,3-dimethyl-2-aryloxetanes (4, 5, 6, 7, and 8), 3,3,4,4-tetramethyl-2,2-diphenyloxetane (9), and 3,3-dimethyl-2,2-diphenyloxetane (10) were studied in degassed N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine at 270–350 °C. Although the fragmentation of 9 and 10 can be understandable on the basis of a diradical mechanism, there were several observations, in the reaction of certain other oxetanes, which could hardly be explained simply in terms of such a mechanism. Namely, (1) less strained 1t reacted faster than more strained 1c; (2) a major mode of the fragmentation for 1c, 2c, and 3c was "B" (forming an alkene and benzaldehyde), whereas that for 1t, 2t, and 3t was "A" (forming an alkenylbenzene and formaldehyde); (3) the apparent energy of activation for the "B" process seemed to be larger than that for the "A"; (4) a dramatic change of the major fragmentation mode from "B" to "A" was brought about by a substituent on the phenyl group, as was observed in 4–8. These results may be explained reasonably by assuming that the fragmentation proceeds, at least, in dual reaction courses. In competition with an anticipated diradical pathway, there will be another process, which is energetically little more favorable than the diradical fragmentation, rather specific to the "A" mode of fragmentation, and important particularly in the reaction of the trans isomers. Probable candidates for the second process are discussed.
Thermal fragmentation of 3-alkyl-2-phenyloxetanes, 3,3-dimethyl-2-aryloxetanes, and related compounds. A case study of 2-aryl-substituted oxetanes