The impact of robotic surgery on quality of life, urinary and sexual function following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis with laparoscopic surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. O103-O113 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. J. Kim ◽  
G.-S. Choi ◽  
J. S. Park ◽  
S. Y. Park ◽  
C. S. Yang ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry H. Chill ◽  
Shani Parnasa ◽  
Noam Shussman ◽  
Roie Alter ◽  
Briggite Helou ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Colorectal cancer is a condition which is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to assess urinary dysfunction and its effect on quality of life in women who underwent total mesorectal excision compared to women treated by partial mesorectal excision for treatment of rectal cancer. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary university hospital between January 2014 and December 2019. A comparison was performed between women who underwent total mesorectal excision as opposed to partial mesorectal excision for treatment of rectal cancer. Pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative data were compared between groups. Urinary dysfunction and its impact on quality of life were assessed using UDI-6 and USIQ questionnaires. Further univariate and multivariate analyses were performed in the attempt of assessing risk factors for urinary dysfunction. Results: A total of 107 women were included in the study, 73 women underwent partial mesorectal excision as opposed to 34 women who were treated by total mesorectal excision. Urinary dysfunction following surgery as assessed using the UDI-6 questionnaire did not differ between groups. Similar findings were recorded with regard to the impact of urinary dysfunction on quality of life as assessed using the USIQ questionnaire. Following multivariate analysis longer hospital stay was associated with increased risk of some degree of urinary dysfunction. Conclusions: Women undergoing total mesorectal excision have comparable results to partial mesorectal excision with regard to urinary dysfunction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry H. Chill ◽  
Shani Y. Parnasa ◽  
Noam Shussman ◽  
Roie Alter ◽  
Briggite Helou ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Colorectal cancer is a condition which is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to assess urinary dysfunction and its effect on quality of life in women who underwent total mesorectal excision compared to women treated by partial mesorectal excision for treatment of rectal cancer. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary university hospital between January 2014 and December 2019. A comparison was performed between women who underwent total mesorectal excision as opposed to partial mesorectal excision for treatment of rectal cancer. Pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative data were compared between groups. Data regarding radiation therapy was recorded and compared as well. Urinary dysfunction and its impact on quality of life were assessed using UDI-6 and USIQ questionnaires. Further univariate and multivariate analyses were performed in the attempt of assessing risk factors for urinary dysfunction. Results A total of 107 women were included in the study, 73 women underwent partial mesorectal excision as opposed to 34 women who were treated by total mesorectal excision. Twenty-five women in the TME group underwent radiation therapy prior to surgery as opposed to none in the PME group (p < 0.001). Urinary dysfunction following surgery as assessed using the UDI-6 questionnaire did not differ between groups. Similar findings were recorded with regard to the impact of urinary dysfunction on quality of life as assessed using the USIQ questionnaire. Following multivariate analysis longer hospital stay was associated with increased risk of some degree of urinary dysfunction. Conclusions Women undergoing total mesorectal excision have comparable results to partial mesorectal excision with regard to urinary dysfunction.


2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. W. A. Koedam ◽  
G. H. van Ramshorst ◽  
C. L. Deijen ◽  
A. K. E. Elfrink ◽  
W. J. H. J. Meijerink ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Borja de Lacy ◽  
Víctor Turrado ◽  
Alba Torroella ◽  
Jacqueline van Laarhoven ◽  
Ana Otero-Piñeiro ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marieke S. Walma ◽  
Verena N. N. Kornmann ◽  
Djamila Boerma ◽  
Marnix A. J. de Roos ◽  
Henderik L. van Westreenen

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (24) ◽  
pp. 6333
Author(s):  
Petra A. Custers ◽  
Barbara M. Geubels ◽  
Inge L. Huibregtse ◽  
Femke P. Peters ◽  
Ellen G. Engelhardt ◽  
...  

Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer is a major operation associated with morbidity and mortality. For older or inoperable patients, alternatives are necessary. This prospective study evaluated the oncological and functional outcome and quality of life of older or inoperable rectal cancer patients treated with a contact X-ray brachytherapy boost to avoid major surgery. During follow-up, tumor response and toxicity on endoscopy were scored. Functional outcome and quality of life were assessed with self-administered questionnaires. Additionally, in-depth interviews regarding patients’ experiences were conducted. Nineteen patients were included with a median age of 80 years (range 72–91); nine patients achieved a clinical complete response and in another four local control of the tumor was established. The 12 month organ-preservation rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 88%, 78%, and 100%, respectively. A transient decrease in quality of life and bowel function was observed at 3 months, which was generally restored at 6 months. In-depth interviews revealed that patients’ experience was positive despite the side-effects shortly after treatment. In older or inoperable rectal cancer patients, contact X-ray brachytherapy can be considered an option to avoid total mesorectal excision. Contact X-ray brachytherapy is well-tolerated and can provide good tumor control.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marloes Veltcamp Helbach ◽  
Thomas W. A. Koedam ◽  
Joep J. Knol ◽  
Simone Velthuis ◽  
H. Jaap Bonjer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document