High risk of permanent stoma after anastomotic leakage in anterior resection for rectal cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Jutesten ◽  
J. Draus ◽  
J. Frey ◽  
G. Neovius ◽  
G. Lindmark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Anterior Resection ◽  
Permanent Stoma

High Risk of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Long-term Follow-up after Anastomotic Leakage in Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrik Jutesten ◽  
Pamela Buchwald ◽  
Eva Angenete ◽  
Martin Rutegård ◽  
Marie-Louise Lydrup
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Anterior Resection ◽  
Low Anterior Resection ◽  
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome ◽  
Anterior Resection Syndrome ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

scholarly journals Protective ileostomy does not prevent anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 030006052094652
Author(s):  
Lei Niu ◽  
Jin Wang ◽  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Xiaomu Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Anterior Resection ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Permanent Stoma ◽  
Protective Ileostomy ◽  
And Control

Objective To explore whether protective ileostomy is beneficial in preventing anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer. Methods A total of 347 patients underwent anterior resection of rectal cancer in our hospital. Ninety-five patients were treated with protective ileostomy (treatment group), and 252 patients were not (control group). The incidences of anastomotic leakage and permanent stoma were compared between the two groups. Results The overall incidences of anastomotic leakage were 6.32% (6/95) and 8.73% (22/252) in the treatment group and control group, respectively. In the cohort of patients who underwent neoadjuvant radiotherapy, the incidence of anastomotic leakage was 5.88% (2/34) and 12.0% (3/25) in the treatment group and control group, respectively. Logistic regression showed that the incidence of anastomotic leakage was not statistically significant. However, diabetes and the anastomotic height significantly affected the occurrence of anastomotic leakage. The permanent stoma rate was 6.42% (6/95) and 5.95% (15/252) in the treatment group and control group, respectively. Conclusion Protective ileostomy did not show a significant advantage in reducing the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage in patients with rectal cancer, and it may lead to a permanent stoma.

Effect of Left Colonic Artery Preservation on Anastomotic Leakage in Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 2935-2943 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takao Hinoi ◽  
Masazumi Okajima ◽  
Manabu Shimomura ◽  
Hiroyuki Egi ◽  
Hideki Ohdan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Anterior Resection ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Anterior Resection

The Impact of Anastomotic Leakage on Long-term Function After Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 619-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Kverneng Hultberg ◽  
Johan Svensson ◽  
Henrik Jutesten ◽  
Jörgen Rutegård ◽  
Peter Matthiessen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Anterior Resection ◽  
Term Function ◽  
The Impact

Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection for rectal cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (S1) ◽  
pp. 35-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Kanellos ◽  
M. G. Pramateftakis ◽  
G. Vrakas ◽  
H. Demetriades ◽  
I. Kanellos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Anterior Resection ◽  
Low Anterior Resection
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document