Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Cardiomyopathy-A Case Series Demonstrating a Reversible Form of Left Ventricular Dysfunction

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 563-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariko L. Ishimori ◽  
Megha Agarwal ◽  
Roy Beigel ◽  
Rita K. Ng ◽  
Nazanin Firooz ◽  
...  
Lupus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 1449-1455
Author(s):  
Mai Emara ◽  
Maher Abdel Hafez ◽  
Aml El-Bendary ◽  
Osama El Razaky

Background Many studies in adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have demonstrated that myocardial dysfunction was significantly associated with enhanced disease activity. However, similar studies in paediatric patients with SLE are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) to detect left ventricular dysfunction in children with active and inactive SLE. Methods This prospective case–control study was carried out on 50 children with SLE. Thirty healthy age- and sex-matched children comprised the control group. The patients were further subdivided into two subgroups: active SLE and inactive SLE. Laboratory investigations undertaken included complete blood count, renal function, C3, C4, ANA, anti-dsDNA and serum N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide. Echocardiographic examinations were performed on all children and included conventional echocardiography, tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and two- and three-dimensional STE. Results There was no statistically significant difference in N-terminal pro B natriuretic peptide between the studied groups. The myocardial performance index by TDI was statistically significantly higher in SLE patients compared to controls. STE parameters were statistically significantly lower in SLE patients compared to controls. There was no correlation between STE parameters and disease activity. Conclusions STE could be a promising technique in the early detection of subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in children with SLE.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 641.1-641
Author(s):  
Y. B. Joo ◽  
Y. J. Park

Background:Infections have been associated with a higher risk of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) flares, but the impact of influenza infection on SLE flares has not been evaluated.Objectives:We evaluated the association between influenza infection and SLE flares resulting in hospitalization.Methods:SLE flares resulting in hospitalization and influenza cases were ascertained from the Korean national healthcare insurance database (2014-2018). We used a self-controlled case series design. We defined the risk interval as the first 7 days after the influenza index date and the control interval was defined as all other times during the observation period of each year. We estimated the incidence rates of SLE flares resulting in hospitalization during the risk interval and control interval and compared them using a Poisson regression model.Results:We identified 1,624 influenza infections among the 1,455 patients with SLE. Among those, there were 98 flares in 79 patients with SLE. The incidence ratio (IR) for flares during the risk interval as compared with the control interval was 25.75 (95% confidence interval 17.63 – 37.59). This significantly increased the IRs for flares during the risk interval in both women (IR 27.65) and men (IR 15.30), all age groups (IR 17.00 – 37.84), with and without immunosuppressive agent (IR 24.29 and 28.45, respectively), and with and without prior respiratory diseases (IR 21.86 and 26.82, respectively).Conclusion:We found significant association between influenza infection and SLE flares resulting in hospitalization. Influenza infection has to be considered as a risk factor for flares in all SLE patients regardless of age, sex, medications, and comorbidities.References:[1]Kwong, J. C. et al. Acute Myocardial Infarction after Laboratory-Confirmed Influenza Infection. N Engl J Med 2018:378;345-353.Table 1.Incidence ratios for SLE flares resulting in hospitalization after influenza infectionRisk intervalIncidence ratio95% CIDuring risk interval for 7 days / control interval25.7517.63 – 37.59Days 1-3 / control interval21.8114.71 – 32.35Days 4-7 / control interval7.563.69 – 15.47SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; CI, confidence intervalDisclosure of Interests:None declared


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 59-60
Author(s):  
Kenneth Ken Siong Lee ◽  
Jamaline Qianzhen Chong ◽  
Abdul Kadir Abu Bakar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document