Aromatase and non‐aromatase neurons in the zebra finch secondary auditory forebrain are indistinct in their song‐driven gene induction and intrinsic electrophysiological properties

Author(s):  
Catherine Bournonville ◽  
Kyssia Ruth Mendoza ◽  
Luke Remage‐Healey
BMC Genomics ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Preethi H Gunaratne ◽  
Ya-Chi Lin ◽  
Ashley L Benham ◽  
Jenny Drnevich ◽  
Cristian Coarfa ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 472-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie A. Grace ◽  
Noopur Amin ◽  
Nandini C. Singh ◽  
Frédéric E. Theunissen

The selectivity of neurons in the zebra finch auditory forebrain for natural sounds was investigated systematically. The principal auditory forebrain area in songbirds consists of the tonotopically organized field L complex, which, by its location in the auditory processing stream, can be compared with the auditory cortex of mammals. We also recorded from a secondary auditory area, cHV. Field L and cHV are auditory processing stages that are presynaptic to the specialized song system nuclei where auditory neurons show an extremely selective response for the bird's own song, but weak response to almost any other sounds, including conspecific songs. In our study, we found that neurons in field L and cHV had stronger responses to conspecific song than to synthetic sounds that were designed to match the lower order acoustical properties of song, such as their overall power spectra and AM spectra. Such preferential responses to natural sounds cannot be explained by linear frequency tuning or simple nonlinear intensity tuning and requires linear or nonlinear spectro-temporal neuronal transfer functions tuned to the acoustical properties of song. The selectivity for conspecific songs in field L and cHV might reflect an intermediate auditory processing stage for vocalizations that then contributes to the generation of the very specific selectivity for the bird's own song seen in the postsynaptic song system.


2005 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 2379-2390 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. F. Kubke ◽  
Y. Yazaki-Sugiyama ◽  
R. Mooney ◽  
J. M. Wild

Learned vocalizations, such as bird song, require intricate coordination of vocal and respiratory muscles. Although the neural basis for this coordination remains poorly understood, it likely includes direct synaptic interactions between respiratory premotor neurons and vocal motor neurons. In birds, as in mammals, the medullary nucleus retroambigualis (RAm) receives synaptic input from higher level respiratory and vocal control centers and projects to a variety of targets. In birds, these include vocal motor neurons in the tracheosyringeal part of the hypoglossal motor nucleus (XIIts), other respiratory premotor neurons, and expiratory motor neurons in the spinal cord. Although various cell types in RAm are distinct in their anatomical projections, their electrophysiological properties remain unknown. Furthermore, although prior studies have shown that RAm provides both excitatory and inhibitory input onto XIIts motor neurons, the identity of the cells in RAm providing either of these inputs remains to be established. To characterize the different RAm neuron types electrophysiologically, we used intracellular recordings in a zebra finch brain stem slice preparation. Based on numerous differences in intrinsic electrophysiological properties and a principal components analysis, we identified two distinct RAm neuron types (types I and II). Antidromic stimulation methods and intracellular staining revealed that type II neurons, but not type I neurons, provide bilateral synaptic input to XIIts. Paired intracellular recordings in RAm and XIIts further indicated that type II neurons with a hyperpolarization-dependent bursting phenotype are a potential source of inhibitory input to XIIts motor neurons. These results indicate that electrically distinct cell types exist in RAm, affording physiological heterogeneity that may play an important role in respiratory–vocal signaling.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisbeth Van Ruijssevelt ◽  
Stuart D. Washington ◽  
Julie Hamaide ◽  
Marleen Verhoye ◽  
Georgios A. Keliris ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elliot A. Layden ◽  
Kathryn E. Schertz ◽  
Marc G. Berman ◽  
Sarah E. London

AbstractMuch as humans acquire speech in early childhood, the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) songbird learns to sing from an adult “tutor” during the first three months of life. Within a well-defined critical period (CP), juvenile zebra finches memorize a tutor song that will guide subsequent motor patterning. This sensory learning process is mediated by tutor experience-dependent neuroplasticity within the auditory forebrain. Here, we used longitudinal resting-state fMRI analyses to investigate whether tutor experience also modifies patterns of functional connectivity (FC) within the juvenile zebra finch brain. Eighteen male zebra finches (only males sing) were scanned before, during, and at the end of the CP, as well as at the young adult stage. Prior to the onset of the CP, birds were separated into rearing conditions: Normal (aviary-housed; N=5), Tutored (one adult male tutor and one adult female; N=7), and Isolate (two adult females, isolated from male song; N=6). Brain-wide voxel-wise analyses identified a single cluster overlapping the left caudomedial nidopallium (NCM) of the auditory forebrain that showed developmentally decreasing FC strength in Isolates but stable or increasing FC in Normal and Tutored birds. Additionally, FC between left NCM and left dorsal cerebellum showed a parallel developmental difference. Developmental changes in left NCM FC strength statistically mediated condition-related differences in song stereotypy. These results extend previous reports of tutor experience-dependent plasticity in NCM at epigenetic, genomic, molecular, and cellular levels to the whole-brain functional network level by demonstrating that tutor experience also influences the development of NCM FC. Moreover, these results link NCM FC to the emergence of song stereotypy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 331 ◽  
pp. 151-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin N. Scully ◽  
Allison H. Hahn ◽  
Kimberley A. Campbell ◽  
Neil McMillan ◽  
Jenna V. Congdon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document