scholarly journals Childhood Abuse, Intimate Partner Violence and Risk of Migraine Among Pregnant Women: An Epidemiologic Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 976-986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bizu Gelaye ◽  
Ngan Do ◽  
Samantha Avila ◽  
Juan Carlos Velez ◽  
Qiu-Yue Zhong ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alissa Huth-Bocks ◽  
Erin Gallagher ◽  
Kylene Krause ◽  
Sarah Ahlfs-Dunn

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. e0190856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vibeke Rasch ◽  
Toan Ngo Van ◽  
Hanh Thi Thuy Nguyen ◽  
Rachel Manongi ◽  
Declare Mushi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 132-137
Author(s):  
ANITA NATH ◽  
SHUBHASHREE VENKATESH ◽  
J. VINDHYA ◽  
SHEEBA BALAN ◽  
CHANDRA S. METGUD

Background Intimate partner violence (IPV) is recognized as an important public health problem globally as well as in India. It may result in adverse physical and mental health consequences for the victim or unfavourable pregnancy outcomes if it happens during pregnancy. The possible risk factors for IPV can be explained by four levels of ecological factors: individual, partner, household and community. We estimated the prevalence of IPV and its association with selected ecological risk factors among pregnant women availing of antenatal care at a public sector hospital in Bengaluru, southern India. Methods We included 350 women above the age of 18 years with a confirmed pregnancy of less than 24 weeks and having no obstetric complication. We used the Conflict Tactics Scale to determine the presence of IPV. The risk factors measured were—individual level: respondent’s age, education, occupation, gravidity, planned or unplanned pregnancy, substance abuse, presence of depression and anxiety; partner-related: spouse’s education, occupation and marital discord; household/community-related: socioeconomic status, social support, religion and consanguinity. Results The prevalence of IPV was 3.7%. Factors that were significantly associated on multivariate analysis were higher age (above 20 years) (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.82 [1.12–2.97], p=0.016) and presence of depression (AOR 6.84 [1.76–26.61], p=0.005). Conclusion The prevalence of IPV was less in our study population compared to figures reported from other Indian study settings.


2020 ◽  
pp. 025371762093887
Author(s):  
Mysore Narasimha Vranda ◽  
Channaveerachari Naveen Kumar ◽  
Dalibonia Muralidhar ◽  
Navaneetham Janardhana ◽  
Palanimuthu Thangaraju Sivakumar

Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is one of the major public health problems. Little is known about the extent of violence experienced, its severity, or history of childhood abuse or exposure to intergenerational family violence in women with mental illness. Methods: One hundred women seeking in-patients (IP) or out-patients (OP) services at a tertiary care psychiatric setting were recruited using consecutive sampling. IPV Questionnaire and Danger Assessment Questionnaire were administered. Results: The data revealed a moderate level of IPV experienced by the women. In their childhood, more than one-third had undergone physical abuse by their fathers and witnessed violence by fathers toward mothers. Conclusion: Screening for intimate violence is essential in women attending mental health settings.


2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 511-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simukai Shamu ◽  
Naeemah Abrahams ◽  
Marleen Temmerman ◽  
Christina Zarowsky

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document