The utility of hereditary thrombophilia testing among patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism

Author(s):  
Cristina Olivo Freites ◽  
Leonard Naymagon
2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (02) ◽  
pp. 271-283
Author(s):  
Manila Gaddh ◽  
Rachel P. Rosovsky

AbstractVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. Up to one half of patients who present with VTE will have an underlying thrombophilic defect. This knowledge has led to a widespread practice of testing for such defects in patients who develop VTE. However, identifying a hereditary thrombophilia by itself does not necessarily change outcomes or dictate therapy. Furthermore, family history of VTE by itself can increase an asymptomatic person's VTE risk several-fold, independent of detecting a known inherited thrombophilia. In this article, we will describe the current validated hereditary thrombophilias including their history, prevalence, and association with VTE. With a focus on evaluating both risks and benefits of testing, we will also explore the controversies of why, who, and when to test as well as discuss contemporary societal guidelines. Lastly, we will share how these tests have been integrated into clinical practice and how to best utilize them in the future.


TH Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 04 (03) ◽  
pp. e153-e162
Author(s):  
Manila Gaddh ◽  
En Cheng ◽  
Maha A.T. Elsebaie ◽  
Imre Bodó

Abstract Introduction Testing for inherited and acquired thrombophilias adds to the cost of care of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), though results may not influence patient management. Methods This is a single-center, retrospective study conducted at Emory University Hospitals from January to December 2015 to (1) determine the pattern of thrombophilia testing in patients with VTE, (2) study the impact of results of thrombophilia testing on clinical decision-making, and (3) determine the direct costs of thrombophilia testing in patients with VTE. Results Of the 266 eligible patients, 189 (71%) underwent testing; 51 (26.9%) tested positive and the results impacted management in 32 (16.9%) of tested patients. Patient undergoing testing were more likely to be younger than 40 years (30.9 vs. 18.2%), have had prior pregnancy loss (9.0 vs. 0%), or known family history of hypercoagulability (24.9 vs. 10.4%), and were less likely to have had provoked VTE (37 vs. 79.2%). The most common thrombophilias tested were antiphospholipid syndrome (60.1%), factor V Leiden (59.7%), and prothrombin gene mutation (57.5%). Direct costs of thrombophilia testing were $2,364.32 per patient, $12,331.55 to diagnose 1 positive, and $19,653.41 per patient-management affected. Conclusion We noted significant variability in selection of patients and panel of tests, sparse utilization of test results in patient management, but high cost associated with thrombophilia testing in patients with VTE. With guidelines advocating selective use of thrombophilia testing and attention to potential impact of test results in patient management, we propose the need for measures at institutional levels to improve test-ordering practices.


2020 ◽  
Vol 195 ◽  
pp. 231-232
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Kovacs ◽  
Alejandro Lazo-Langner ◽  
Martha L. Louzada ◽  
Michael J. Kovacs

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 107602962094447
Author(s):  
Lei Li ◽  
Lixia Gao ◽  
Xi Wu ◽  
Wenman Wu ◽  
Qiulan Ding ◽  
...  

The changes in the coagulation, fibrinolytic, and endothelial functions are correlated with the pathophysiology of the thromboembolic diseases during acute illness. However, these changes in patients with hereditary thrombophilia who were not in the acute stage of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are unclear. A panel of 4 biomarkers, including thrombin–antithrombin complex (TAT), plasmin-α2-plasmin inhibitor complex (PIC), tissue-type plasminogen activator/plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 complex (t-PAIC), and soluble thrombomodulin (sTM), were assayed in 100 healthy controls and 100 patients with thrombophilia. Although significantly higher concentrations of TAT, PIC, t-PAIC, and sTM were observed in patients with thrombophilia than in healthy controls, 70 patients showed absolutely normal levels of the above 4 biomarkers. Among the other 30 patients who had at least 1 biomarker out of the corresponding reference interval, 26 of them presented elevated PIC with or without increased TAT. Except for sTM, other 3 biomarkers did not show significant differences in patients with previous VTE compared to those without. Patients with single episode of VTE had obviously lower t-PAIC than those with multiple episodes of VTE, whereas the levels of TAT, PIC, and sTM were unassociated with the number of thrombosis episodes. Most thrombophilia patients who were not in the acute stage of VTE showed normal coagulation, fibrinolytic, and endothelial functions. Thus, we were unable to show that the one-time response of this panel was clinically helpful in determining thrombosis risk in thrombophilia individuals. Future studies should focus on the dynamic monitoring during the chronic phase of VTE to offer special advantages for patients with thrombophilia.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 5345-5345
Author(s):  
Chris Bombardier ◽  
Linda J. Jacobson ◽  
Marilyn J. Manco-Johnson ◽  
Neil A Goldenberg

Abstract BACKGROUND: The factor V (FV) Leiden and prothrombin (PT) G20210A polymorphisms in heterozygous state are present in 5% and 1–2% of Caucasians, respectively, and confer approximately 5-fold and 2-fold increases in the risk of incident venous thromboembolism (VTE). While some families who carry these genetic thrombophilia traits exhibit a prothrombotic phenotype, others have no (or only a limited) history of VTE. The ability to discern which individuals with personal and familial carriage of these genetic thrombophilias possess a clinically meaningful increase in VTE risk remains elusive, and (particularly among children) is perhaps best informed presently by family history of VTE. OBJECTIVE AND HYPOTHESES: We sought to evaluate overall plasma coagulative capacity in FV Leiden and PT G20210A heterozygotes using the Clot Formation and Lysis (CloFAL) assay, a global turbidimetric plasma assay of tissue-factor induced fibrin clot formation and tissue-type plasminogen activator enhanced fibrinolysis. We hypothesized that children heterozygous for either thrombophilia would not uniformly demonstrate hypercoagulability, but that coagulative capacity would be increased among heterozygotes who have a family history of VTE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children aged birth to 18 years (inclusive) enrolled in prospective inceptional cohort study of thrombosis/thrombophilia/stroke were included in the analysis if they were found to be heterozygous for FV Leiden or PT G20210A upon comprehensive thrombophilia testing and had undergone CloFAL assay testing on a research basis. Data on personal and family history of thrombotic events, thrombophilia testing, and CloFAL assay findings were analyzed. Intergroup comparisons of continuous data were performed by Mann-Whitney U test and proportions were compared between groups using chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. RESULTS: Characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1. Approximately 70% of patients were evaluated for a family history of VTE (with/without known thrombophilia) and nearly 50% had personal histories of VTE or arterial ischemic stroke (AIS)/recurrent transient ischemic attack (TIA); those evaluated for events were significantly older than those without events, and this difference was statistically significant among those with a positive family history fo VTE. Hypercoagulability was shown in 50% of patients and hypofibrinolysis in 13% using the CloFAL assay. Plasma coagulative capacity and maximal amplitude (MA) of the CloFAL waveform were significantly increased in patients with, versus without, family history of VTE (coagulation index, CI: 102% vs. 72% of the adult normal pooled plasma standard, respectively, p=0.04; MA: 0.415 vs. 0.322, p=0.02), and were not explained by age differences between groups. However, in this relatively small study population, the proportion of CloFAL CI results that exceeded the upper limit of normal values did not significantly differ between those with, versus without, family history of VTE. Pediatric FV Leiden or PT G20210A heterozygotes with positive family history of VTE were more likely to have multi-trait (>1) thrombophilia, in which case a trend toward increased plasma coagulability was demonstrated (CI: 139% [multi-trait] vs. 86% [isolated trait]; p=0.07); superimposed thrombophilias in this group most often consisted of elevated factor VIII activity and Lp(a) concentration. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings using the CloFAL global assay indicate that, while pediatric FV Leiden or PT G20210A heterozygotes do not uniformly exhibit hypercoagulability, plasma coagulative capacity is nevertheless significantly increased among heterozgyotes who have a family history of VTE, which may relate to the presence of superimposed thrombophilias. Table 1. Summary characteristics of the study population. *VTE, AIS, or recurrent TIA **Two patients were dual heterozygotes. N 32 Median age at evaluation (range) 9.5 y (1–18 y) Personal history of events* 14 y (1–18 y) No personal history of events* 8 y (2–18 y) FV Leiden heterozygote (n) 26** PT G20210A heterozygote (n) 8** Personal history of VTE (n) 11 Personal history of AIS/recurrent TIA 4 Family history (1st/2nd degree) of VTE 71% Multi-trait (>1) thrombophilia 45% Acquired thrombophilia 24% Hypercoagulability by CloFAL assay 50% Hypofibrinolysis by CloFAL assay 13%


1998 ◽  
Vol 158 (5) ◽  
pp. 1369-1373 ◽  
Author(s):  
SUSAN MURIN ◽  
GREGORY P. MARELICH ◽  
ALEJANDRO C. ARROLIGA ◽  
RICHARD A. MATTHAY

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document