Machine Learning in the Prediction of Medical Inpatient Length of Stay

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Bacchi ◽  
Yiran Tan ◽  
Luke Oakden‐Rayner ◽  
Jim Jannes ◽  
Timothy Kleinig ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. E444-E445
Author(s):  
Brooks V Udelsman ◽  
Pamela S Jones ◽  
Yanik J Bababekov ◽  
Bob S Carter ◽  
David C Chang


Neurosurgery ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 384-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Whitney E Muhlestein ◽  
Dallin S Akagi ◽  
Jason M Davies ◽  
Lola B Chambless

Abstract BACKGROUND Current outcomes prediction tools are largely based on and limited by regression methods. Utilization of machine learning (ML) methods that can handle multiple diverse inputs could strengthen predictive abilities and improve patient outcomes. Inpatient length of stay (LOS) is one such outcome that serves as a surrogate for patient disease severity and resource utilization. OBJECTIVE To develop a novel method to systematically rank, select, and combine ML algorithms to build a model that predicts LOS following craniotomy for brain tumor. METHODS A training dataset of 41 222 patients who underwent craniotomy for brain tumor was created from the National Inpatient Sample. Twenty-nine ML algorithms were trained on 26 preoperative variables to predict LOS. Trained algorithms were ranked by calculating the root mean square logarithmic error (RMSLE) and top performing algorithms combined to form an ensemble. The ensemble was externally validated using a dataset of 4592 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Additional analyses identified variables that most strongly influence the ensemble model predictions. RESULTS The ensemble model predicted LOS with RMSLE of .555 (95% confidence interval, .553-.557) on internal validation and .631 on external validation. Nonelective surgery, preoperative pneumonia, sodium abnormality, or weight loss, and non-White race were the strongest predictors of increased LOS. CONCLUSION An ML ensemble model predicts LOS with good performance on internal and external validation, and yields clinical insights that may potentially improve patient outcomes. This systematic ML method can be applied to a broad range of clinical problems to improve patient care.





Author(s):  
Pedro Vinícius Staziaki ◽  
Di Wu ◽  
Jesse C. Rayan ◽  
Irene Dixe de Oliveira Santo ◽  
Feng Nan ◽  
...  


Author(s):  
Hilary I. Okagbue ◽  
Patience I. Adamu ◽  
Pelumi E. Oguntunde ◽  
Emmanuela C. M. Obasi ◽  
Oluwole A. Odetunmibi


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ylenia Colella ◽  
Arianna Scala ◽  
Chiara De Lauri ◽  
Francesco Bruno ◽  
Giuseppe Cesarelli ◽  
...  


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S33-S34
Author(s):  
Morgan A Taylor ◽  
Randy D Kearns ◽  
Jeffrey E Carter ◽  
Mark H Ebell ◽  
Curt A Harris

Abstract Introduction A nuclear disaster would generate an unprecedented volume of thermal burn patients from the explosion and subsequent mass fires (Figure 1). Prediction models characterizing outcomes for these patients may better equip healthcare providers and other responders to manage large scale nuclear events. Logistic regression models have traditionally been employed to develop prediction scores for mortality of all burn patients. However, other healthcare disciplines have increasingly transitioned to machine learning (ML) models, which are automatically generated and continually improved, potentially increasing predictive accuracy. Preliminary research suggests ML models can predict burn patient mortality more accurately than commonly used prediction scores. The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy of various ML methods in assessing thermal burn patient mortality and length of stay in burn centers. Methods This retrospective study identified patients with fire/flame burn etiologies in the National Burn Repository between the years 2009 – 2018. Patients were randomly partitioned into a 67%/33% split for training and validation. A random forest model (RF) and an artificial neural network (ANN) were then constructed for each outcome, mortality and length of stay. These models were then compared to logistic regression models and previously developed prediction tools with similar outcomes using a combination of classification and regression metrics. Results During the study period, 82,404 burn patients with a thermal etiology were identified in the analysis. The ANN models will likely tend to overfit the data, which can be resolved by ending the model training early or adding additional regularization parameters. Further exploration of the advantages and limitations of these models is forthcoming as metric analyses become available. Conclusions In this proof-of-concept study, we anticipate that at least one ML model will predict the targeted outcomes of thermal burn patient mortality and length of stay as judged by the fidelity with which it matches the logistic regression analysis. These advancements can then help disaster preparedness programs consider resource limitations during catastrophic incidents resulting in burn injuries.



2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nianyue Wu ◽  
Siru Liu ◽  
Haotian Zhang ◽  
Xiaomin Hou ◽  
Ping Zhang ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND The intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay is significant to evaluate the effect of cardiac surgical treatment inpatient. OBJECTIVE This research aims to accurately predict the ICU length of stay in patients with cardiac surgery. Methods: We used machine learning methods to construct the model, and the medical information mart for intensive care (MIMIC IV) database was used as the data source. A total of 7,567 patients were enrolled and the mean length of stay in the ICU was 3.12 days. A total of 126 predictors were included, and 44 important predictors were screened by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression. METHODS We used machine learning methods to construct the model, and the medical information mart for intensive care (MIMIC IV) database was used as the data source. A total of 7,567 patients were enrolled and the mean length of stay in the ICU was 3.12 days. A total of 126 predictors were included, and 44 important predictors were screened by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression. RESULTS The mean accuracy are 0.603 (95% confidence interval (CI): [0.602-0.604]), 0.687 (95% confidence interval (CI): [0.687-0.688]) and 0.688 (95% confidence interval (CI): [0.687-0.689]) for the logistic regression (LR) with all variables, the gradient boosted decision tree (GBDT) with important variables and the GBDT with all variables respectively. CONCLUSIONS The GBDT model with important predictors partly overestimated patients whose length of stay was less than 3 days and underestimated patients whose length of stay was longer than 3 days. But the better prediction performance of GBDT facilitates early intervention of ICU patients with a long period of hospitalization.



2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Schmutte ◽  
Laurie Van der Heide ◽  
Lori Szczygiel ◽  
Ann Phelan ◽  
Larry Davidson ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document