Clinical outcomes of lung-transplant recipients treated by voriconazole and caspofungin combination in aspergillosis

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Thomas ◽  
V. Korb ◽  
R. Guillemain ◽  
T. Caruba ◽  
V. Boussaud ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 421-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C Chu ◽  
Patrick J Smith ◽  
John M Reynolds ◽  
Scott M Palmer ◽  
Laurie D Snyder ◽  
...  

Objective Posttransplant depression has been linked to increased risk for adverse outcomes in lung transplant patients. Maintaining target serum immunosuppressant levels is also essential for optimal lung transplant clinical outcome and may be a crucial predictor of outcomes. Because depression could affect medication nonadherence, resulting in out-of-range immunosuppressant levels, we examined the relationship between posttransplant depression, immunosuppressant medication trough level variability, indexed by out-of-range values on clinical outcomes and coefficient of variability, and clinical outcomes. Method A consecutive series of 236 lung transplant recipients completed the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression two-month posttransplant. Immunosuppressant trough levels (i.e., tacrolimus or cyclosporine) within the range of individualized immunosuppressant targets were obtained at three-, six-, nine-month follow-up clinic visits. Clinical outcomes including hospitalizations and mortality were obtained from medical records. Results Fourteen percent of patients were classified as depressed (Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression ≥16), 144 (61%) of patients had at least 25% out-of-range immunosuppressant values, and the average coefficient of variability was 36%. Over a median of 2.6 years (interquartile range = 1.2), 32 participants died (14%) and 144 (61%) had at least one unplanned, transplant-related hospitalization. Both depression (hazard ratio = 1.45 (1.19, 1.76), p < . 01) and immunosuppressant variation (immunosuppressant out-of-range: hazard ratio = 1.41 (1.10, 1.81), p < .01) independently predicted more frequent hospitalizations and higher mortality. Conclusions Early posttransplant depression was associated with significantly worse clinical outcomes. While immunosuppressant level variability is also related to adverse outcomes, such variability does not account for increased risk observed with depression.


2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle P. Porter ◽  
Ying Guo ◽  
Jason Perry ◽  
David L. Gossage ◽  
Timothy R. Watkins ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT This study summarizes drug resistance analyses in 4 recent phase 2b trials of the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) fusion inhibitor presatovir in naturally infected adults. Adult hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients, lung transplant recipients, or hospitalized patients with naturally acquired, laboratory-confirmed RSV infection were enrolled in 4 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies with study-specific presatovir dosing. Full-length RSV F sequences amplified from nasal swabs obtained at baseline and postbaseline were analyzed by population sequencing. Substitutions at RSV fusion inhibitor resistance-associated positions are reported. Genotypic analyses were performed on 233 presatovir-treated and 149 placebo-treated subjects. RSV F variant V127A was present in 8 subjects at baseline. Population sequencing detected treatment-emergent substitutions in 10/89 (11.2%) HCT recipients with upper and 6/29 (20.7%) with lower respiratory tract infection, 1/35 (2.9%) lung transplant recipients, and 1/80 (1.3%) hospitalized patients treated with presatovir; placebo-treated subjects had no emergent resistance-associated substitutions. Subjects with substitutions at resistance-associated positions had smaller decreases in viral load during treatment relative to those without, but they had similar clinical outcomes. Subject population type and dosing regimen may have influenced RSV resistance development during presatovir treatment. Subjects with genotypic resistance development had decreased virologic responses compared to those without genotypic resistance but had comparable clinical outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitipong Permpalung ◽  
Katrina Bazemore ◽  
Teresa Po-Yu Chiang ◽  
Joby Mathew ◽  
Lindsay Barker ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. e0257807
Author(s):  
Jan C. Kamp ◽  
Jan B. Hinrichs ◽  
Jan Fuge ◽  
Raphael Ewen ◽  
Jens Gottlieb

Patients after lung transplantation are at risk for life-threatening infections. Recently, several publications on COVID-19 outcomes in this patient population appeared, but knowledge on optimal treatment, mortality, outcomes, and appropriate risk predictors is limited. A retrospective analysis was performed in a German high-volume lung transplant center between 19th March 2020 and 18th May 2021. Impact of COVID-19 on physical and psychological health, clinical outcomes, and mortality were analyzed including follow-up visits up to 12 weeks after infection in survivors. Predictive parameters on survival were assessed using univariate and multivariate proportional hazards regression models. Out of 1,046 patients in follow-up, 31 acquired COVID-19 during the pandemic. 12 of 31 (39%) died and 26 (84%) were hospitalized. In survivors a significant decline in exercise capacity (p = 0.034), TLC (p = 0.02), and DLCO (p = 0.007) was observed at follow-up after 3 months. Anxiety, depression, and self-assessed quality of life remained stable. Charlson comorbidity index predicted mortality (HR 1.5, 1.1–2.2; p = 0.023). In recipients with pre-existing CLAD, mortality and clinical outcomes were inferior. However, pre-existing CLAD did not predict mortality. COVID-19 remains a life-threatening disease for lung transplant recipients, particularly in case comorbidities. Further studies on long term outcomes and impact on pre-existing CLAD are needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document