200-m-deep earthquake swarm in Tricastin (lower Rhône Valley, France) accounts for noisy seismicity over past centuries

Terra Nova ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Thouvenot ◽  
Liliane Jenatton ◽  
Jean-Pierre Gratier
Author(s):  
Danila Chebrov ◽  
A. Chebrova ◽  
E. Matveenko ◽  
S. Droznina ◽  
Svetlana Mityushkina ◽  
...  

The seismicity of Kamchatka and surrounding territories for 2013 is viewed. The minimum local magnitude of completeness is MLmin=3.25 in the Kamchatka earthquake catalogue totally, and MLmin=4 for earthquakes under the Okhotsk sea (with h≥350 km). The Kamchatka earthquake catalogue of 2013 with ML≥3.6, which includes 1750 events, is published. 146 earthquakes of published catalog with ML=3.6–7.8 were felt with seismic intensity ranged from 2 to 7 of the MSK-64 scale in Kamchatka and surrounding areas. Focal mechanisms were determined in two ways: 1) from first motion P-wave arrivals for 107 earthquakes; 2) using waveforms for 25 earthquakes. The background seismicity level (SESL’09) within the Kamchatka responsibility zone was extremely high in 2013. It exceeded the rate of seismicity in all previous years of observations. There were 6672 earthquakes, including 129 events with КS≥11.5 (ML≥5) in the region during the year. The mechanisms of 107 earthquakes were defined. 148 earthquakes were felt with intensity from 2 up to 7 on the territory of Kamchatskii Krai, North Kuril Islands, and Komandor Islands. There were several unusual events in 2013. The strong earthquake with magnitude Mw=5.8 on March 13 in the area of the Kamchatka Isthmus (Il'pyr earthquake), which is a rare phenomenon for the Northern Kamchatka. There was the strongest deep earthquake in the world (Mw=8.3) on May 24 under the Sea of Okhotsk (Okhotsk earthquake) at the depth of 630 km. The event caused an abnormal macro-seismic effect. The intensive earthquake swarm was observed in the Avacha Bay (Mwmax=6.1) in May 2013. It is the strongest earthquake swarm registered by the Kamchatka network during the period of detailed seismological observations since 1962


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Ebel ◽  
◽  
Parker W. Aubin ◽  
Justin Starr ◽  
Nawa Dahal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.T. Long ◽  
A. Kocaoglu ◽  
R. Hawman ◽  
P.J.W. Gore

Abstract During the summer of 1993, the residents in the Norris Lake community, Lithonia, Georgia, were bothered by an incessant swarm of earthquakes. The largest, a magnitude 2.7 on September 23, showed a normal aftershock decay and occurred after the main swarm. Over 10,000 earthquakes have been detected, of which perhaps 500 were felt. The earthquakes began June 8, 1993, with a 5-day swarm. The residents, accustomed to quarry explosions, suspected the quarries of irregular activities. To locate the source of the events, a visual recorder and a digital event recorder were placed in the epicentral area. Ten to 20 events were detected per day for the next three weeks. The swarm then escalated to a peak of over 100 per day by August 15, 1993. Activity following the peak died down to about 10 events per day. The magnitude 2.7 event of September 23 was followed by a normal aftershock sequence. The larger events were felt with intensity V within 2 km of their epicenter, and noticed (intensity II) to a distance of 15 km. Some incidents of cracked wallboard and foundations have been reported, but no significant damage has been documented. Preliminary locations, based on data from digital event recorders, suggest an average depth of 1.0 km. The hypocenters are in the Lithonia gneiss, a massive migmatite resistant to weathering and used locally as a building stone. The epicenters are 1 to 2 km south-southwest of the Norris Lake Community. The cause of the seismicity is not yet known. The earthquakes are characteristic of reservoir-induced earthquakes; however, Norris Lake is a small (96 acres), 2 to 5m deep recreational lake which has existed since the 1950s.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 434-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Jonas Imperiale ◽  
Frank Vanclay

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to reflect on what can be learned about disaster risk reduction (DRR) from the L’Aquila trial of scientists. The court case was initiated because of a controversial meeting on 31 March 2009 of the Major Risks Committee (MRC), held under the auspices of the Italian Department of Civil Protection. The purpose of the meeting was to consider (prior to the fatal earthquake of 6 April 2009) disaster risk in the L’Aquila area, which was being affected by an earthquake swarm since October 2008. Design/methodology/approach The authors undertook a document analysis of trial materials, and a review of academic and media commentary about the trial. Findings The legal process revealed that disaster governance was inadequate and not informed by the DRR paradigm or international guidelines. Risk assessment was carried out only in a techno-scientific manner, with little acknowledgement of the social issues influencing risks at the local community level. There was no inclusion of local knowledge or engagement of local people in transformative DRR strategies. Originality/value Most previous commentary is inadequate in terms of not considering the institutional, scientific and social responsibilities for DRR as exposed by the trial. This paper is unique in that it considers the contents of the MRC meeting as well as all trial documents. It provides a comprehensive reflection on the implications of this case for DRR and the resilience of peoples and places at risk. It highlights that a switch from civil protection to community empowerment is needed to achieve sustainable outcomes at the local level.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 1092-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. H. W. Goebel ◽  
S. M. Hosseini ◽  
F. Cappa ◽  
E. Hauksson ◽  
J. P. Ampuero ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (15) ◽  
pp. 7706-7714 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gualandi ◽  
C. Nichele ◽  
E. Serpelloni ◽  
L. Chiaraluce ◽  
L. Anderlini ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (S1) ◽  
pp. A115-A115
Author(s):  
Jean-Michel Livrozet ◽  
Anne-Cécile Delinotte ◽  
Sébastien Cambau ◽  
Mireille Joliot-Vilain ◽  
Colette Coudeyras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document