scholarly journals KAMCHATKA AND COMMANDER ISLANDS

2019 ◽  
pp. 198-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danila Chebrov ◽  
A. Chebrova ◽  
E. Matveenko ◽  
S. Droznina ◽  
Svetlana Mityushkina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Earthquake Swarm ◽  
Seismic Intensity ◽  
Seismic Effect ◽  
Earthquake Catalogue ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Commander Islands ◽  
Deep Earthquake ◽  
Kamchatka Earthquake ◽  
First Motion ◽  
Surrounding Areas

The seismicity of Kamchatka and surrounding territories for 2013 is viewed. The minimum local magnitude of completeness is MLmin=3.25 in the Kamchatka earthquake catalogue totally, and MLmin=4 for earthquakes under the Okhotsk sea (with h≥350 km). The Kamchatka earthquake catalogue of 2013 with ML≥3.6, which includes 1750 events, is published. 146 earthquakes of published catalog with ML=3.6–7.8 were felt with seismic intensity ranged from 2 to 7 of the MSK-64 scale in Kamchatka and surrounding areas. Focal mechanisms were determined in two ways: 1) from first motion P-wave arrivals for 107 earthquakes; 2) using waveforms for 25 earthquakes. The background seismicity level (SESL’09) within the Kamchatka responsibility zone was extremely high in 2013. It exceeded the rate of seismicity in all previous years of observations. There were 6672 earthquakes, including 129 events with КS≥11.5 (ML≥5) in the region during the year. The mechanisms of 107 earthquakes were defined. 148 earthquakes were felt with intensity from 2 up to 7 on the territory of Kamchatskii Krai, North Kuril Islands, and Komandor Islands. There were several unusual events in 2013. The strong earthquake with magnitude Mw=5.8 on March 13 in the area of the Kamchatka Isthmus (Il'pyr earthquake), which is a rare phenomenon for the Northern Kamchatka. There was the strongest deep earthquake in the world (Mw=8.3) on May 24 under the Sea of Okhotsk (Okhotsk earthquake) at the depth of 630 km. The event caused an abnormal macro-seismic effect. The intensive earthquake swarm was observed in the Avacha Bay (Mwmax=6.1) in May 2013. It is the strongest earthquake swarm registered by the Kamchatka network during the period of detailed seismological observations since 1962

scholarly journals KAMCHATKA AND COMMANDER ISLANDS

2020 ◽  
pp. 172-182
Author(s):  
D. Chebrov ◽  
A. Chebrova ◽  
I. Abubakirov ◽  
E. Matveenko ◽  
S. Mityushkina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Moment Tensor ◽  
Seismic Intensity ◽  
Earthquake Catalogue ◽  
Seismic Moment Tensor ◽  
Magnitude Of Completeness ◽  
Commander Islands ◽  
Strong Earthquakes ◽  
Double Couple ◽  
Kamchatka Earthquake ◽  
Surrounding Areas

The seismicity review of Kamchatka and surrounding territories for 2014 is given. In Kamchatka earthquake catalogue minimum local magnitude of completeness is MLmin=3.5, and for earthquakes under the Okhotsk sea with h≥350 kmMLmin=3.6. The Kamchatka earthquake catalogue for 2014 with ML3.5, published in the Appendix to this annual, includes 1114 events. 86 earthquakes of the catalogue with ML=3.35–6.2 were felt in Kamchatka and surrounding areas with seismic intensity I ranged from 2 to 5 according the MSK-64 scale. For all events with ML5.0 occurred in the area of responsibility of the KB GS RAS in 2014, an attempt to calculate the seismic moment tensor (SMT) was made. There are 40 such events in the regional catalogue. For 36 earthquakes, the SMT and depth h of the equivalent point source were calculated successfully. The calcu-lations were performed for the SMT double-couple model using a nonlinear algorithm. In 2014, a typical location of the earthquake epicenters was observed in the Kamchatka zone. In 2014, the seismicity level in all selected zones and in the region as a whole corresponded to the background one according to the “SESL’09” scale. The number of recorded events with ML3.6 and strong earthquakes with ML5.1 is close to the average annual value. Anomalous and outstanding events were not recorded.

scholarly journals SEISMICITY of KAMCHATKA and COMMANDER ISLANDS in 2015

2021 ◽  
pp. 153-163
Author(s):  
D. Chebrov ◽  
V. Saltikov ◽  
E. Matveenko ◽  
S. Droznina ◽  
E. Romasheva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Moment Tensor ◽  
Seismic Intensity ◽  
Earthquake Catalogue ◽  
Seismic Moment Tensor ◽  
Commander Islands ◽  
Strong Earthquakes ◽  
Significant Events ◽  
Double Couple ◽  
Kamchatka Earthquake ◽  
Surrounding Areas

The seismicity review of Kamchatka and surrounding territories for 2015 is given. In the Kamchatka earthquake catalogue, the minimum local magnitude of completeness is MLmin=3.5, and for earthquakes with h≥350 km under the Okhotsk sea MLmin=3.6. The Kamchatka earthquake catalogue for 2015 with ML3.5, published in the Appendix to this issue, includes 1213 events. 92 earthquakes of the catalogue with ML=3.0–6.5 were felt in Kamchatka and surrounding areas with seismic intensity I=2–6 according to the MSK-64 scale. For all events with ML5.0 that occurred in 2015 in the KB GS RAS area of responsibility, an attempt to calculate the seismic moment tensor (SMT) was made. There are 32 such events in the regional catalogue. For 28 earthquakes the SMT and depth h of the equivalent point source were calculated successfully. The calculations were performed for the SMT double-couple model using a nonlinear algorithm. In 2015, a typical location of the earthquake epicenters was observed in the Kamchatka zone. In 2015, the seismicity level in all selected zones and in the region as a whole correspond to the background one according to the “SESL’09” scale. The number of recorded events with ML3.5 and strong earthquakes with ML5.0 is close to the average annual value. Anomalous and significant events were not recorded.

200-m-deep earthquake swarm in Tricastin (lower Rhône Valley, France) accounts for noisy seismicity over past centuries

Terra Nova ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Thouvenot ◽  
Liliane Jenatton ◽  
Jean-Pierre Gratier
Keyword(s):  
Earthquake Swarm ◽  
Deep Earthquake ◽  
Rhone Valley

Earthquake/earth tide correlation and other features of the Susanville, California, earthquake sequence of June-July 1976

1980 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 1583-1593
Author(s):  
Amy S. Mohler
Keyword(s):  
Shear Stress ◽  
Compressive Stress ◽  
Sierra Nevada ◽  
Fault Plane ◽  
Earth Tide ◽  
P Wave ◽  
First Motion ◽  
Entire Sequence ◽  
June July ◽  
Earthquake Sequences

abstract An earthquake of magnitude ML 4.5 occurred on June 20, 1976 in an area of complex faulting in northeastern California, near the intersection of the Sierra Nevada, Modoc Plateau, Cascade Range, and Basin and Range geological provinces. P-wave first motion plots for larger aftershocks of this earthquake indicate maximum and minimum compressive stress, respectively, in north-south and east-west directions, with predominantly strike-slip motion. Focal depths for these events ranged from 7 to 15 km, consistent with other earthquake sequences in the region. Origin times of more than 4,700 aftershocks for the period between June 20 and July 1 are compared with the phase of solid-earth tidal components appropriate for normal and shear stress on northeast- and northwest-trending fault planes. Based on this comparison, approximately 20 per cent more earthquakes occurred at times when the normal compressive stress on the fault plane was decreasing, and the shear stress was increasing in the sense of slip on the fault plane. This correlation may be explained by two large bursts of aftershocks that occurred at times when tidal stresses were favorable for motion on the fault plane, rather than continuous triggering of small events during the entire sequence.

The Peru-Bolivia border earthquake of August 15, 1963

1970 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 639-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umesh Chandra
Keyword(s):  
Travel Time ◽  
Fault Plane ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Focal Mechanism Solution ◽  
Event Analysis ◽  
Rupture Propagation ◽  
Fault Propagation ◽  
Amplitude Data ◽  
First Motion ◽  
Deep Focus

abstract The seismograms of the deep focus Peru-Bolivia border earthquake of August 15, 1963 reveal the presence of a number of conspicuous phases occurring within 15 seconds of the first P onset. These phases cannot be explained on the basis of known travel-time curves. Accordingly, the earthquake is interpreted to have occurred in a series of jerks during the course of fault propagation, or in other words it is composed of multiple events. Only one of these events, following the first event, at which the amplitude of the recorded motion becomes suddenly very large, has been located in this study. The focal mechanism solution of this earthquake has been determined from the P wave first motion and amplitude data. Consideration of the direction of rupture propagation determined from the multiple event analysis makes it possible to identify the fault plane in the mechanism solution. The parameters of the fault plane, length and speed of rupture between the two events have been determined.

Source mechanism of two 1994 intermediate-depth-focus earthquakes in Guerrero, Mexico

1999 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 1004-1018
Author(s):  
Luis Quintanar ◽  
J. Yamamoto ◽  
Z. Jiménez
Keyword(s):  
Focal Mechanism ◽  
Seismic Moment ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Focal Mechanism Solution ◽  
Medium Size ◽  
Small Contribution ◽  
Normal Faulting ◽  
Intermediate Depth ◽  
Double Couple ◽  
First Motion

Abstract In May and December 1994, two medium-size, intermediate-depth-focus earthquakes occurred in Guerrero, Mexico, eastward of the rupture area of the great Michoacan earthquake of September 19, 1985. Even though these are not major earthquakes (∼6.4 Mw), they were widely felt through central and southern Mexico, with minor damage at Zihuatanejo and Acapulco, located along the Pacific coast, and Mexico City. Both earthquakes, separated by ∼100 km, have similar focal depths and magnitudes, however, their focal mechanisms, based upon the polarities of first arrivals, show some differences. The May earthquake shows a clear normal faulting mechanism (φ = 307°, δ = 55°, λ = −108°), whereas the December earthquake mechanism solution suggests an initial thrust faulting (φ = 313°, δ = 62°, λ = 98°) process. Although previous analysis, including local and teleseismic stations, reported a normal faulting for the December earthquake, we find that modeling using the CMT focal mechanism solution fails to reproduce the first 5 sec of the observed P-wave signal at the nearest broadband station (Δ = 168 km) and the S-wave polarity at two strong ground-motion local stations (Δ = 32, 53 km); in fact, the best fit for these stations is obtained using the thrust focal mechanism calculated from the first-motion method. Seismic moment value and rupture duration time deduced from the teleseismic spectral analysis are: 2.0 × 1018 N-m and 6.9 sec for the May event; 2.8 × 1018 N-m and 7.1 sec for the December earthquake. From the inferred seismic moment, an average Δσ of ∼15 bars for both earthquakes is obtained. Inversion of teleseismic P-wave data indicates a better fit using the CMT focal mechanism solution (normal faulting) than the first-motion mechanism for both earthquakes, although the adjustment's differences are small for the May event; for this earthquake, the rupture consisted of two sources separated by ∼7 sec, starting at a depth of ∼40 km and then propagating downdip, reaching a depth of ∼60 km. The December earthquake however, released, all its energy at a depth of 50 km in two main sources separated by ∼10 sec. The non-double-couple components values are −0.004 and −0.01 for the May and December events, respectively, indicating that the December shock has a small contribution of non-double-couple radiation that could be the result of a changing mechanism. This result agrees with the hypothesis that a slab subducting at a shallower angle (our case) is associated with the existence of random subfaults with different fault orientations. From a tectonic point of view, the complexity of the December earthquake could be the result of the observed complexity of the stress distribution around 101°W and the existence of compressional events beneath the normal faulting earthquakes near the coastline. This feature permits the flexural stresses associated to the slab bending upward to become subhorizontal at the Guerrero region. We conclude that the May earthquake corresponds to a pure normal faulting, whereas the December shock is a complex event with a variable fault geometry.

scholarly journals P-wave first-motion polarity determination of waveform data in western Japan using deep learning

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shota Hara ◽  
Yukitoshi Fukahata ◽  
Yoshihisa Iio
Keyword(s):  
Training Data ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Waveform Data ◽  
Arrival Times ◽  
Distribution Maps ◽  
Seismic Waveforms ◽  
Polarity Determination ◽  
Western Japan ◽  
First Motion

AbstractP-wave first-motion polarity is the most useful information in determining the focal mechanisms of earthquakes, particularly for smaller earthquakes. Algorithms have been developed to automatically determine P-wave first-motion polarity, but the performance level of the conventional algorithms remains lower than that of human experts. In this study, we develop a model of the convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to determine the P-wave first-motion polarity of observed seismic waveforms under the condition that P-wave arrival times determined by human experts are known in advance. In training and testing the CNN model, we use about 130 thousand 250 Hz and about 40 thousand 100 Hz waveform data observed in the San-in and the northern Kinki regions, western Japan, where three to four times larger number of waveform data were obtained in the former region than in the latter. First, we train the CNN models using 250 Hz and 100 Hz waveform data, respectively, from both regions. The accuracies of the CNN models are 97.9% for the 250 Hz data and 95.4% for the 100 Hz data. Next, to examine the regional dependence, we divide the waveform data sets according to the observation region, and then we train new CNN models with the data from one region and test them using the data from the other region. We find that the accuracy is generally high ($${ \gtrsim }$$≳ 95%) and the regional dependence is within about 2%. This suggests that there is almost no need to retrain the CNN model by regions. We also find that the accuracy is significantly lower when the number of training data is less than 10 thousand, and that the performance of the CNN models is a few percentage points higher when using 250 Hz data compared to 100 Hz data. Distribution maps, on which polarities determined by human experts and the CNN models are plotted, suggest that the performance of the CNN models is better than that of human experts.

Practical Site-Specific Earthquake Early Warning Application

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 579-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuhisa Kanda ◽  
◽  
Tadashi Nasu ◽  
Masamitsu Miyamura
Keyword(s):  
Early Warning ◽  
Estimation Error ◽  
Seismic Intensity ◽  
Earthquake Early Warning ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Japan Meteorological Agency ◽  
Estimation Accuracy ◽  
Intensity Estimation ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Wide Range

Real-time hazard mitigation we have developed using earthquake early warning (EEW) (1) enhances seismic intensity estimation accuracy and (2) extends the interval between when an EEW is issued and when strong tremors arrive. We accomplished the first point (enhancing seismic intensity estimation) by reducing estimation error to less than that commonly used based on an attenuation relationship and soil amplification factor by considering source-location and wave propagation path differences based on site-specific empiricism. We accomplished the second point (shortening the time between warnings and when tremors arrive) using a high-speed, reliable communication network for receiving EEW information from the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) and quickly transmitting warning signals to users. In areas close to quake epicenters, however, warnings may not arrive before the arrival of strong ground motions. The on-site warning system we developed uses P-wave pickup sensors that detect P-wave arrival at a site and predict seismic intensity of subsequent S-waves. We confirmed the on-site warning prototype’s feasibility based on numerical simulation and observation. We also developed an integration server for combining on-site warnings with JMA information to be applied to earthquakes over a wide range of distances. We installed a practical prototype at a construction site near the 2008 Iwate-Miyagi Inland Earthquake epicenter to measure its aftershocks because JMA EEW information was too late to use against the main shock. We obtained good aftershock results, confirming the prototype’s applicability and accuracy. Integration server combination logic was developed for manufacturing sites requiring highly robust, reliable control.

scholarly journals Okhotsk deep earthquake 24.05.2013: nature of coseismal earth’s oscillations and estimation of P-wave amplitudes at teleseismic distances

2019 ◽  
Vol 486 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-242
Author(s):  
I. P. Kuzin ◽  
L. I. Lobkovskiy ◽  
K. A. Dozorova
Keyword(s):  
Sea Of Okhotsk ◽  
Seismic Waves ◽  
P Wave ◽  
P Waves ◽  
Deep Earthquake ◽  
Epicentral Area ◽  
Seismic Stations ◽  
The Sea Of Okhotsk ◽  
Gps Observations

The results of coseismic GPS observations in the epicentral area of 2013 Sea-of- Okhotsk earthquake are presented and specific features of seismic waves amplitudes variations with distance are detected basing on the records of Russian and international seismic stations. Global propagation of P-waves for the Sea-of-Okhotsk and Bolivian (09.06.1994) earthquakes was studied and their amplitudes on teleseismic distances were estimated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document