scholarly journals kappa (Kappa), a Novel Factor for the Arrest of Transcription in vitro by DNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase from Escherichia coli at Specific Sites of Natural Templates

1973 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolf Schafer ◽  
Wolfram Zillig
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Transcription In Vitro

scholarly journals DksA Is Required for Growth Phase-Dependent Regulation, Growth Rate-Dependent Control, and Stringent Control of fis Expression in Escherichia coli

2006 ◽  
Vol 188 (16) ◽  
pp. 5775-5782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prabhat Mallik ◽  
Brian J. Paul ◽  
Steven T. Rutherford ◽  
Richard L. Gourse ◽  
Robert Osuna
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Growth Rate ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Growth Phase ◽  
Stationary Growth ◽  
Rate Dependent ◽  
Transcription In Vitro ◽  
State Growth

ABSTRACT DksA is a critical transcription factor in Escherichia coli that binds to RNA polymerase and potentiates control of rRNA promoters and certain amino acid promoters. Given the kinetic similarities between rRNA promoters and the fis promoter (Pfis), we investigated the possibility that DksA might also control transcription from Pfis. We show that the absence of dksA extends transcription from Pfis well into the late logarithmic and stationary growth phases, demonstrating the importance of DksA for growth phase-dependent regulation of fis. We also show that transcription from Pfis increases with steady-state growth rate and that dksA is absolutely required for this regulation. In addition, both DksA and ppGpp are required for inhibition of Pfis promoter activity following amino acid starvation, and these factors act directly and synergistically to negatively control Pfis transcription in vitro. DksA decreases the half-life of the intrinsically short-lived fis promoter-RNA polymerase complex and increases its sensitivity to the concentration of CTP, the predominant initiating nucleotide triphosphate for this promoter. This work extends our understanding of the multiple factors controlling fis expression and demonstrates the generality of the DksA requirement for regulation of kinetically similar promoters.

scholarly journals Mutational Analysis of the Chlamydia trachomatis rRNA P1 Promoter Defines Four Regions Important for Transcription In Vitro

1998 ◽  
Vol 180 (9) ◽  
pp. 2359-2366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Tan ◽  
Tamas Gaal ◽  
Richard L. Gourse ◽  
Joanne N. Engel
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Chlamydia Trachomatis ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
Rna Polymerases ◽  
Rich Region ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Transcription In Vitro

ABSTRACT We have characterized the Chlamydia trachomatisribosomal promoter, rRNA P1, by measuring the effect of substitutions and deletions on in vitro transcription with partially purifiedC. trachomatis RNA polymerase. Our analyses indicate that rRNA P1 contains potential −10 and −35 elements, analogous toEscherichia coli promoters recognized by E-ς70. We identified a novel AT-rich region immediately downstream of the −35 region. The effect of this region was specific for C. trachomatis RNA polymerase and strongly attenuated by single G or C substitutions. Upstream of the −35 region was an AT-rich sequence that enhanced transcription by C. trachomatis and E. coli RNA polymerases. We propose that this region functions as an UP element.

scholarly journals Activation of Escherichia coli leuVTranscription by FIS

1999 ◽  
Vol 181 (12) ◽  
pp. 3864-3868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilma Ross ◽  
Julia Salomon ◽  
Walter M. Holmes ◽  
Richard L. Gourse
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Stable Complex ◽  
Start Site ◽  
Transcription Start ◽  
Transcription In Vitro ◽  
A Site

ABSTRACT The transcription factor FIS has been implicated in the regulation of several stable RNA promoters, including that for the major tRNALeu species in Escherichia coli, tRNA1 Leu. However, no evidence for direct involvement of FIS in tRNA1 Leu expression has been reported. We show here that FIS binds to a site upstream of the leuVpromoter (centered at −71) and that it directly stimulatesleuV transcription in vitro. A mutation in the FIS binding site reduces transcription from a leuV promoter in strains containing FIS but has no effect on transcription in strains lacking FIS, indicating that FIS contributes to leuV expression in vivo. We also find that RNA polymerase forms an unusual heparin-sensitive complex with the leuV promoter, having a downstream protection boundary of ∼−7, and that the first two nucleotides of the transcript, GTP and UTP, are required for formation of a heparin-stable complex that extends downstream of the transcription start site. These studies have implications for the regulation of leuV transcription.

Activation by TyrR in Escherichia coli K-12 by Interaction between TyrR and the α-subunit of RNA polymerase

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Camakaris ◽  
Ji Yang ◽  
Tadashi Fujii ◽  
James Pittard
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Regulatory Protein ◽  
Aromatic Amino Acids ◽  
Regulation Of Transcription ◽  
Plant Interactions ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Partial Suppression ◽  
K 12

A novel selection was developed for RpoA α-CTD mutants altered in activation by the TyrR regulatory protein of E. coli K-12. This allowed the identification of an aspartate to asparagine substitution in residue 250 (DN250) as an Act - mutation. Amino acid residues known to be close to D250 were altered by in vitro mutagenesis, and substitutions DR250, RE310 and RD310 were all shown to be defective in activation. None of these mutations caused defects in UP regulation. The rpoA mutation DN250 was transferred onto the chromosome to facilitate the isolation of suppressor mutations. TyrR Mutations EK139 and RG119 caused partial suppression of rpoA DN250, and TyrR RC119, RL119, RP119, RA77 and SG100 caused partial suppression of rpoA RE310. Additional activation-defective rpoA mutants (DT250, RS310, EG288) were also isolated, using the chromosomal rpoA DN250 strain. Several new Act - tyrR mutants were isolated in an rpoA + strain, adding positions R77, D97, K101, D118, R119, R121 and E141 to known residues, S95 and D103, and defining the ‘activation patch’ on the NTD of TyrR. These results support a model for activation of TyrR-regulated genes where the ‘activation patch’ on the TyrR NTD interacts with the ‘TyrR-specific patch’ on the αCTD of RNA polymerase. Given known structures, both these sites appear to be surface exposed, and suggest a model for activation by TyrR. They also help resolve confusing results in the literature that implicated residues within the 261 and 265 determinants, as Activator contact sites. IMPORTANCE Regulation of transcription by RNA polymerases is fundamental for adaptation to a changing environment and for cellular differentiation, across all kingdoms of life. The gene TyrR in Escherichia coli is a particularly useful model because it is involved in both activation and repression of a large number of operons by a range of mechanisms, and it interacts with all three aromatic amino acids and probably other effectors. Furthermore TyrR has homologues in many other genera, regulating many different genes, utilizing different effector molecules, and in some cases affecting virulence, and important plant interactions.

The general transcription factor RAP30 binds to RNA polymerase II and prevents it from binding nonspecifically to DNA

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-37
Author(s):  
M T Killeen ◽  
J F Greenblatt
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Glutathione S Transferase ◽  
General Transcription Factor ◽  
Indirect Consequence ◽  
Transcription In Vitro ◽  
Sigma 70

RAP30/74 is a human general transcription factor that binds to RNA polymerase II and is required for initiation of transcription in vitro regardless of whether the promoter has a recognizable TATA box (Z. F. Burton, M. Killeen, M. Sopta, L. G. Ortolan, and J. F. Greenblatt, Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:1602-1613, 1988). Part of the amino acid sequence of RAP30, the small subunit of RAP30/74, has limited homology with part of Escherichia coli sigma 70 (M. Sopta, Z. F. Burton, and J. Greenblatt, Nature (London) 341:410-414, 1989). To determine which sigmalike activities of RAP30/74 could be attributed to RAP30, we purified human RAP30 and a RAP30-glutathione-S-transferase fusion protein that had been produced in E. coli. Bacterially produced RAP30 bound to RNA polymerase II in the absence of RAP74. Both partially purified natural RAP30/74 and recombinant RAP30 prevented RNA polymerase II from binding nonspecifically to DNA. In addition, nonspecific transcription by RNA polymerase II was greatly inhibited by RAP30-glutathione-S-transferase. DNA-bound RNA polymerase II could be removed from DNA by partially purified RAP30/74 but not by bacterially expressed RAP30. Thus, the ability of RAP30/74 to recruit RNA polymerase II to a promoter-bound preinitiation complex may be an indirect consequence of its ability to suppress nonspecific binding of RNA polymerase II to DNA.

scholarly journals Mitotic repression of transcription in vitro.

1993 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
pp. 613-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Hartl ◽  
J Gottesfeld ◽  
D J Forbes
Keyword(s):  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Topoisomerase Ii ◽  
Chromatin Condensation ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Protein Kinase Activity ◽  
Cdc2 Kinase ◽  
Polymerase Iii ◽  
Transcription In Vitro

A normal consequence of mitosis in eukaryotes is the repression of transcription. Using Xenopus egg extracts shifted to a mitotic state by the addition of purified cyclin, we have for the first time been able to reproduce a mitotic repression of transcription in vitro. Active RNA polymerase III transcription is observed in interphase extracts, but strongly repressed in extracts converted to mitosis. With the topoisomerase II inhibitor VM-26, we demonstrate that this mitotic repression of RNA polymerase III transcription does not require normal chromatin condensation. Similarly; in vitro mitotic repression of transcription does not require the presence of nucleosome structure or involve a general repressive chromatin-binding protein, as inhibition of chromatin formation with saturating amounts of non-specific DNA has no effect on repression. Instead, the mitotic repression of transcription appears to be due to phosphorylation of a component of the transcription machinery by a mitotic protein kinase, either cdc2 kinase and/or a kinase activated by it. Mitotic repression of RNA polymerase III transcription is observed both in complete mitotic cytosol and when a kinase-enriched mitotic fraction is added to a highly simplified 5S RNA transcription reaction. We present evidence that, upon depletion of cdc2 kinase, a secondary protein kinase activity remains and can mediate this in vitro mitotic repression of transcription.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document