The Effect of the "D" Genome from Synthetic Wheat Lines in Anther Culture Responses

1994 ◽  
Vol 112 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ghaemi ◽  
A. Sarrafi
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghader Mirzaghaderi ◽  
Zinat Abdolmalaki ◽  
Rahman Ebrahimzadegan ◽  
Farshid Bahmani ◽  
Fatemeh Orooji ◽  
...  

AbstractDue to the accumulation of various useful traits over evolutionary time, emmer wheat (Triticum turgidum subsp. dicoccum and dicoccoides, 2n = 4x = 28; AABB), durum wheat (T. turgidum subsp. durum, 2n = 4x = 28; AABB), T. timopheevii (2n = 4x = 28; AAGG) and D genome containing Aegilops species offer excellent sources of novel variation for the improvement of bread wheat (T. aestivum L., AABBDD). Here, we made 192 different cross combinations between diverse genotypes of wheat and Aegilops species including emmer wheat × Ae. tauschii (2n = DD or DDDD), durum wheat × Ae. tauschii, T. timopheevii × Ae. tauschii, Ae. crassa × durum wheat, Ae. cylindrica × durum wheat and Ae. ventricosa × durum wheat in the field over three successive years. We successfully recovered 56 different synthetic hexaploid and octaploid F2 lines with AABBDD, AABBDDDD, AAGGDD, D1D1XcrXcrAABB, DcDcCcCcAABB and DvDvNvNvAABB genomes via in vitro rescue of F1 embryos and spontaneous production of F2 seeds on the Fl plants. Cytogenetic analysis of F2 lines showed that the produced synthetic wheat lines were generally promising stable amphiploids. Contribution of D genome bearing Aegilops and the less-investigated emmer wheat genotypes as parents in the crosses resulted in synthetic amphiploids which are a valuable resource for bread wheat breeding.


2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. P. Shamanin ◽  
I. V. Pototskaya ◽  
S. S. Shepelev ◽  
V. E. Pozherukova ◽  
A. Yu. Truschenko ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 125 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. L. McIntyre ◽  
A. Rattey ◽  
A. Kilian ◽  
M. F. Dreccer ◽  
R. Shorter

Synthetic hexaploid wheats (SHWs) and their synthetic derivative lines (SDLs) are being used as a means of introducing novel genetic variation into bread wheat (BW). Phenotypic information for days to flowering, height, grain weight and grain yield was collected from multiple environments for three SDL families, each with ~50 lines, and their elite BW parents. In general, the SDLs were earlier flowering and taller with larger grain size, but similar grain yield to the BWs. The three SDL families and their SHW and BW parents were genotyped using mapped DArT (diversity arrays technology) markers. Within each SDL family, SHW-specific DArT markers were used to identify SHW-derived chromosomal regions that appeared to be preferentially retained in the SDL families, as determined by retention at frequencies >0.25, the expected frequency for Mendelian segregation. Regions on chromosomes 2BS and 7BL appeared to be preferentially retained in all three SDL families, while regions on chromosomes 1AL, 1BS, 3BS, 5AS, 5BL, and 7AS were preferentially retained in two of the three SDL families. Other regions were preferentially retained in single families only, including some regions located on the D genome. Single-marker regression analysis was performed using the preferentially retained markers and identified markers and regions that were significantly associated with one or more of the four traits measured. Comparative mapping also indicates that these preferentially retained markers and chromosome regions may co-locate with previously identified QTLs for anthesis, height, grain weight and/or grain yield. Therefore, SHWs may contain novel alleles at these loci in these regions for these traits, which may provide a selective advantage to the SDLs. This approach could provide a useful method for identifying chromosomal regions of interest with potentially novel alleles for introgression for further BW improvement.


2007 ◽  
Vol 114 (5) ◽  
pp. 855-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Tadesse ◽  
M. Schmolke ◽  
S. L. K. Hsam ◽  
V. Mohler ◽  
G. Wenzel ◽  
...  

Euphytica ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 198 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Shoup Rupp ◽  
Zachary G. Simon ◽  
Beth Gillett-Walker ◽  
John P. Fellers

2011 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. El-Hennawy ◽  
A.F. Abdalla ◽  
S.A. Shafey ◽  
I.M. Al-Ashkar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document