scholarly journals Resting motor threshold changes and clinical response to prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in depressed patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 344-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Baptiste Pretalli ◽  
Magali Nicolier ◽  
Gilles Chopard ◽  
Pierre Vandel ◽  
Grégory Tio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Threshold ◽  
Depressed Patients ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold

scholarly journals Antidepressant effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is not impaired by intake of lithium or antiepileptic drugs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Hebel ◽  
M. A. Abdelnaim ◽  
M. Deppe ◽  
P. M. Kreuzer ◽  
A. Mohonko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Valproic Acid ◽  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Antiepileptic Drugs ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Factor Group ◽  
Mood Stabilizers ◽  
Motor Threshold ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold

Abstract Introduction The effect of concomitant medication on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) outcomes in depression remains understudied. Recent analyses show attenuation of rTMS effects by antipsychotic medication and benzodiazepines, but data on the effects of antiepileptic drugs and lithium used as mood stabilizers or augmenting agents are sparse despite clinical relevance. Preclinical electrophysiological studies suggest relevant impact of the medication on treatment, but this might not translate into clinical practice. We aimed to investigate the role of lithium (Li), lamotrigine (LTG) and valproic acid (VPA) by analyzing rTMS treatment outcomes in depressed patients. Methods 299 patients with uni- and bipolar depression treated with rTMS were selected for analysis in respect to intake of lithium, lamotrigine and valproic acid. The majority (n = 251) were treated with high-frequency (10–20 Hz) rTMS of the lDLPFC for an average of 17 treatment sessions with a figure-of-8 coil with a MagVenture system aiming for 110% resting motor threshold, and smaller groups of patients were being treated with other protocols including intermittent theta-burst stimulation and bilateral prefrontal and medial prefrontal protocols. For group comparisons, we used analysis of variance with the between-subjects factor group or Chi-Square Test of Independence depending on the scales of measurement. For post-hoc tests, we used least significant difference (LSD). For differences in treatment effects between groups, we used an ANOVA with the between-subjects factor group (groups: no mood stabilizer, Li, LTG, VPA, Li + LTG) the within-subjects factor treatment (pre vs. post treatment with rTMS) and also Chi-Square Tests of independence for response and remission. Results Overall, patients showed an amelioration of symptoms with no significant differences for the main effect of group and for the interaction effect treatment by group. Based on direct comparisons between the single groups taking mood stabilizers against the group taking no mood stabilizers, we see a superior effect of lamotrigine, valproic acid and combination of lithium and lamotrigine for the response and remission rates. Motor threshold was significantly and markedly higher for patients taking valproic acid. Conclusion Being treated with lithium, lamotrigine and valproic acid had no relevant influence on rTMS treatment outcome. The results suggest there is no reason for clinicians to withhold or withdraw these types of medication from patients who are about to undergo a course of rTMS. Prospective controlled work on the subject is encouraged.

Low-intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation decreases motor cortical excitability in humans

2006 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 500-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Todd ◽  
Stanley C. Flavel ◽  
Michael C. Ridding
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Threshold ◽  
Sham Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortical Excitability ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold ◽  
Active Motor ◽  
Motor Cortical

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex (rTMS) can be used to modify motor cortical excitability in human subjects. At stimulus intensities near to or above resting motor threshold, low-frequency rTMS (∼1 Hz) decreases motor cortical excitability, whereas high-frequency rTMS (5–20 Hz) can increase excitability. We investigated the effect of 10 min of intermittent rTMS on motor cortical excitability in normal subjects at two frequencies (2 or 6 Hz). Three low intensities of stimulation (70, 80, and 90% of active motor threshold) and sham stimulation were used. The number of stimuli were matched between conditions. Motor cortical excitability was investigated by measurement of the motor-evoked potential (MEP) evoked by single magnetic stimuli in the relaxed first dorsal interosseus muscle. The intensity of the single stimuli was set to evoke baseline MEPs of ∼1 mV in amplitude. Both 2- and 6-Hz stimulation, at 80% of active motor threshold, reduced the magnitude of MEPs for ∼30 min ( P < 0.05). MEPs returned to baseline values after a weak voluntary contraction. Stimulation at 70 and 90% of active motor threshold and sham stimulation did not induce a significant group effect on MEP magnitude. However, the intersubject response to rTMS at 90% of active motor threshold was highly variable, with some subjects showing significant MEP facilitation and others inhibition. These results suggest that, at low stimulus intensities, the intensity of stimulation may be as important as frequency in determining the effect of rTMS on motor cortical excitability.

scholarly journals Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Dysesthesia Caused by Subacute Myelo-Optico-Neuropathy: A Case Report

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-174
Author(s):  
Tomoo Mano ◽  
Satoshi Kuru
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Antibacterial Drug ◽  
Motor Threshold ◽  
Neuromuscular Dysfunction ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold ◽  
Sensory Disturbances

Subacute myelo-optico-neuropathy (SMON) is caused by the ingestion of clioquinol (5-chloro-7-iodo-8-hydroxyquinoline), which is an intestinal antibacterial drug. Patients with SMON typically suffer from abnormal dysesthesia in the lower limbs, which cannot explain the mechanism only in pathology and electrophysiology. Neuromodulation therapies are increasingly being investigated as a means of alleviating abnormal sensory disturbances. We report here the response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for dysesthesia in a patient with SMON. The patient underwent rTMS treatment once per week for 12 weeks. rTMS was administered at 10 Hz, 90% of the resting motor threshold over the bilateral primary motor cortex foot area, for a total of 1,500 stimuli per day. After the treatment had finished at 12 weeks, the abnormal dysesthesia gradually declined. At first, there were improvements only in the area with a feeling of adherence. Later, this sensation was eliminated. Three months following the application, most of the feeling of adherence had disappeared and the feeling of tightness was slightly reduced. In contrast, the throbbing feeling had not changed during this period. Dysesthesia may indicate a process of central sensitization, which would contribute to chronic neuromuscular dysfunction. This case suggests that rTMS is a promising therapeutic application for dysesthesia.

scholarly journals Comparison of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation parameters on motor cortex excitability in normal subjects

2016 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 002-006
Author(s):  
Lara Schrader ◽  
Sima Sadeghinejad ◽  
Jalleh Sadeghinejad ◽  
Movses Kazanchyan ◽  
Lisa Koski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Motor Threshold ◽  
Motor Cortex Excitability ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold

Abstract Background/objectives Optimal low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) parameters for treating epilepsy and other brain disorders are unknown. To address this question, a systematic study of the effects of LF-rTMS frequency and intensity on cortical excitability was performed. Methods Using a four-period crossover design, subjects were scheduled for four LF-rTMS sessions that were at least four weeks apart. LF-rTMS was delivered as 900 pulses directed at primary motor cortex using four protocols: 0.5 Hz at 90% resting motor threshold (RMT), 0.5 Hz at 110% RMT, 1 Hz at 90% RMT, and 1 Hz at 110% RMT. Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, resting motor threshold (RMT), and cortical silent period (CSP) were measured before, immediately after, and 60 min after LF-rTMS. Each of the four protocols was analyzed separately to compare baseline measurements to those after LF-rTMS. Results None of the four LF-rTMS protocols produced a trend or significant change in MEP amplitude, RMT, or CSP. Conclusion The lack of significant effect from the four LF-rTMS protocols indicates that none produced evidence for alteration of cortical excitability. The direct comparison of four LF-rTMS protocols is distinct to this investigation, as most similar studies were exploratory and studied only one or two protocols. The negative result relates only to the methods used in this investigation and does not indicate that LF-rTMS does not alter cortical excitability with other parameters. These results may be useful when designing additional investigations into the effect of LF-rTMS on epilepsy, other disorders, and cortical excitability.

Three-dimensional optical imaging of brain activation during transcranial magnetic stimulation

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Jingyu Huang ◽  
Shixie Jiang ◽  
Ryan Wagoner ◽  
Hao Yang ◽  
Glenn Currier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Optical Tomography ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Motor Threshold ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold ◽  
Noninvasive Neuroimaging ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Potential Tool

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the brain is an effective clinical treatment for psychiatric disorders. Noninvasive neuroimaging during rTMS allows visualization of cortical brain activations and responses, and it is a potential tool for investigating the neurophysiological response occurring actively during stimulation. In this paper, we present a fast diffuse optical tomography (DOT) approach for three-dimensional brain mapping of hemodynamics during rTMS. Eight healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. These subjects received 10 Hz stimulation with 80%and 100%of resting motor threshold (rMT), respectively, for 4 seconds for each stimulation. Significant hemodynamic activation was observed in all cases with the strongest response when 100%rMT stimulation was applied. This work demonstrates that fast DOT has the potential to become a powerful tool for noninvasive three-dimensional imaging of the brain during rTMS.

scholarly journals Effect of Pulse Duration and Direction on Plasticity Induced by 5 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Correlation With Neuronal Depolarization

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Islam Halawa ◽  
Katharina Reichert ◽  
Aman S. Aberra ◽  
Martin Sommer ◽  
Angel V. Peterchev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Pulse Duration ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Pass Filter ◽  
Low Pass Filter ◽  
Time Constants ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold

Introduction: High frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation applied to the motor cortex causes an increase in the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) that persists after stimulation. Here, we focus on the aftereffects generated by high frequency controllable pulse TMS (cTMS) with different directions, intensities, and pulse durations.Objectives: To investigate the influence of pulse duration, direction, and amplitude in correlation to induced depolarization on the excitatory plastic aftereffects of 5 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) using bidirectional cTMS pulses.Methods: We stimulated the hand motor cortex with 5 Hz rTMS applying 1,200 bidirectional pulses with the main component durations of 80, 100, and 120 μs using a controllable pulse stimulator TMS (cTMS). Fourteen healthy subjects were investigated in nine sessions with 80% resting motor threshold (RMT) for posterior-anterior (PA) and 80 and 90% RMT anterior-posterior (AP) induced current direction. We used a model approximating neuronal membranes as a linear first order low-pass filter to estimate the strength–duration time constant and to simulate the membrane polarization produced by each waveform.Results: PA and AP 5 Hz rTMS at 80% RMT produced no significant excitation. An exploratory analysis indicated that 90% RMT AP stimulation with 100 and 120 μs pulses but not 80 μs pulses led to significant excitation. We found a positive correlation between the plastic outcome of each session and the simulated peak neural membrane depolarization for time constants &gt;100 μs. This correlation was strongest for neural elements that are depolarized by the main phase of the AP pulse, suggesting the effects were dependent on pulse direction.Conclusions: Among the tested conditions, only 5 Hz rTMS with higher intensity and wider pulses appeared to produce excitatory aftereffects. This correlated with the greater depolarization of neural elements with time constants slower than the directly activated neural elements responsible for producing the motor output (e.g., somatic or dendritic membrane).Significance: Higher intensities and wider pulses seem to be more efficient in inducing excitation. If confirmed, this observation could lead to better results in future clinical studies performed with wider pulses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document