The International Classification of Headache Disorders Revised Criteria for Chronic Migraine—Field Testing in a Headache Specialty Clinic

Cephalalgia ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
ME Bigal ◽  
AM Rapoport ◽  
FD Sheftell ◽  
SJ Tepper ◽  
RB Lipton

In the absence of a biological marker and expert consensus on the best approach to classify chronic migraine (CM), recent revised criteria for this disease has been proposed by the Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. This revised criteria for CM is now presented in the Appendix. Herein we field test the revised criteria for CM. We included individuals with transformed migraine with or without medication overuse (TM+ and TM-), according to the criteria proposed by Silberstein and Lipton, since this criterion has been largely used before the Second Edition of the International Classification of the Headache Disorders (ICHD-2). We assessed the proportion of subjects that fulfilled ICHD-2 criteria for CM or probable chronic migraine with probable medication overuse (CM+), as well as the revised ICHD-2 (ICHD-2R) criteria for CM (≥15 days of headache, ≥8 days of migraine or migraine-specific acute medication use—ergotamine or triptans). We also tested the ICHD-2R vs. three proposals. In proposal 1, CM/CM+ would require at least 15 days of migraine or probable migraine per month. Proposal 2 required ≥15 days of headache per month and at least 50% of these days were migraine or probable migraine. Proposal 3 required ≥15 days of headache and at least 8 days of migraine or probable migraine per month. Of the 158 patients with TM-, just 5.6% met ICHD-2 criteria for CM. According to the ICHD-2R, a total of 92.4% met criteria for CM ( P < 0.001 vs. ICHD-2). The ICHD-2R criterion performed better than proposal 1 (47.8% of agreement, P < 0.01) and was not statistically different from proposals 2 (87.9%) and 3 (94.9%). Subjects with TM+ should be classified as medication overuse headache (MOH), and not CM+, according to the ICHD-2R. Nonetheless, we assessed the proportion of them who had ≥8 days of migraine per month. Of the 399 individuals with TM+, just 10.2% could be classified as CM+ in the ICHD-2. However, most (349, 86.9%) had ≥8 days of migraine per month and could be classified as MOH and probable CM in the ICHD-2R ( P < 0.001 vs. ICHD-2). We conclude that the ICHD-2R addresses most of the criticism towards the ICHD-2 and should be adopted in clinical practice and research. In the population where use of specific acute migraine medications is less common, the agreement between ICHD-2R CM and TM may be less robust.

Cephalalgia ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 477-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
ME Bigal ◽  
SJ Tepper ◽  
FD Sheftell ◽  
AM Rapoport ◽  
RB Lipton

The criteria for chronic migraine (CM), as proposed by the Second Edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-2) is very restrictive, excluding most patients that evolve from episodic migraine. In this study we empirically tested three recent proposals for revised criteria for CM. We included individuals with transformed migraine (TM) with or without medication overuse, according to the criteria proposed by Silberstein and Lipton. All individuals had headache calendars for at least three consecutive months. We assessed the proportion of subjects that fulfilled ICHD-2 criteria for CM or probable chronic migraine with probable medication overuse (CM+). We also tested three proposals for making the CM criteria more inclusive. In proposal 1, CM/CM+ would require at least 15 days of migraine or probable migraine per month. Proposal 2 suggests that CM/CM+ would be classified in those with ≥15 days of headache per month, where at least 50% of these days are migraine or probable migraine. Proposal 3 suggests that CM/CM+ would be classified in those with chronic daily headache and at least 8 days of migraine or probable migraine per month. Among TM sufferers, 399 (62.5%) had TM with medication overuse, and just 10.2% were classified as CM+ 158 (37.5%) had TM without medication overuse; just nine (5.6%) met current ICHD-2 criteria for CM. Using the alternative criteria, proposal 1 included 48.7% of patients with TM without medication overuse; proposal 2 captured 88%, and proposal 3 classified 94.9% of these patients. For TM with medication overuse, the proportions for proposals 1-3 were, respectively, 37%, 81% and 91%. The differences were statistically significant, favouring proposal 3. Consistently, criteria for CM and CM+ should be revised to require at least 8 days of migraine or probable migraine per month, in individuals with 15 or more days of headache per month.


2021 ◽  
pp. 72-74
Author(s):  
Mario Fernando Prieto Peres ◽  
Thaiza Agostini Córdoba de Lima ◽  
Marcelo Moraes Valença

The article is a critical analysis of the diagnostic criteria for medication-overuse headache. This is an important discussion to improve the criteria in the next update, as well as providing a critical view for neurologists when applying the criteria to their clinical practice.


Cephalalgia ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 445-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Sun-Edelstein ◽  
ME Bigal ◽  
AM Rapoport

Despite the recent advances in the understanding and classification of the chronic daily headaches, considerable controversy still exists regarding the classification of individual headaches, including chronic migraine (CM) and medication overuse headache (MOH). The original criteria, published in 2004, were difficult to apply to most patients with these disorders and were subsequently revised, resulting in broader clinical applicability. Nonetheless, they remain a topic of debate, and the revisions to the criteria have further added to the confusion. Even some prominent headache specialists are unsure which criteria to use. We aimed to explain the nature of the controversies surrounding the entities of CM and MOH. A clinical case will be used to illustrate some of the problems faced by clinicians in diagnosing patients with chronic daily headache.


Cephalalgia ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 1146-1158 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Lantéri-Minet ◽  
D Valade ◽  
G Géraud ◽  
MH Chautard ◽  
C Lucas

The 2004 International Headache Society (IHS) classification of headache disorders introduced the new category of probable migraine defined by the existence of all but one of typical migraine criteria. FRAMIG 3, the first nationwide population-based survey performed in France using the 2004 IHS classification, assessed the prevalence of probable migraine and compared its features and management with those of strict migraine. Of a representative sample of 10 532 adult subjects interviewed, 1179 subjects (11.2%) were diagnosed as having strict migraine and 1066 (10.1%) as having probable migraine. The criterion most frequently missing was typical headache duration (4-72 h) and most subjects with probable headache had shorter average headache duration. Migraine severity and disability, although lower than those noted in subjects with strict migraine, were significant in subjects with probable migraine and quality of life impairment was identical among the two groups of migraine sufferers. Strict and probable migraine, which have similar prevalence and impact on migraine subjects, deserve similar medical and therapeutic management.


Author(s):  
Jonathan P. Gladstone ◽  
David W. Dodick

In 1988, the International Headache Society created a classification system that has become the standard for headache diagnosis and research. The International Classification of Headache Disorders galvanized the headache community and stimulated nosologic, epidemiologic, pathophysiologic, and genetic research. It also facilitated multinational clinical drug trials that have led to the basis of current treatment guidelines. While there have been criticisms, the classification received widespread support by headache societies around the globe. Fifteen years later, the International Headache Society released the revised and expanded International Classification of Headache Disorders second edition. The unprecedented and rapid advances in the field of headache led to the inclusion of many new primary and secondary headache disorders in the revised classification. Using illustrative cases, this review highlights 10 important new headache types that have been added to the second edition. It is important for neurologists to familiarize themselves with the diagnostic criteria for the frequently encountered primary headache disorders and to be able to access the classification (www.i-h-s.org) for the less commonly encountered or diagnostically challenging presentations of headache and facial pain.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 251581631882407
Author(s):  
Marco Lisicki ◽  
Juan Antonio Castro Flores ◽  
Carlos Alberto Bordini ◽  
María Teresa Goicochea ◽  
Mario Fernando Prieto Peres

Introduction: Headache epidemiological studies in Latin America are scarce, and available data suggest that medication overuse headache is an existing health concern in the region. Materials and Methods: A survey empirically constructed to assess the management of medication overuse headache was sent to all the International Headache Society (IHS) members from Latin American countries. Results: We found no IHS members in 13 countries of Latin America. In countries with active members, the median number of IHS members per million inhabitants was significantly less when compared to Western Europe. Although the International Classification of Headache Disorders-3-beta (ICHD-3-beta) criterion was the most frequently used tool for medication overuse headache diagnosis, 41% of responders considered the diagnostic criterion ‘ambiguous’ and only 67% found them ‘very useful’. With respect to preferred treatment patterns, an important lack of uniformity, and a very limited usage of therapeutic approaches widely employed in other regions, characterized the responses. Conclusion: There is an urgent need to reach a consensus and establish region-specific strategies for the management of medication overuse headache as well as other headache disorders in this region. Development of headache specialized educational programmes, and participation of Latin American health providers in the IHS, should be incentivized.


Cephalalgia ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 378-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
CJ Boes ◽  
DJ Capobianco

We set out to review early descriptions of chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache. The International Headache Society (IHS) recently gave criteria for chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache. Chronic migraine was absent from the 1988 IHS criteria. Peters and Horton described ergotamine-overuse headache in 1951. In the 1980s it was more fully appreciated that overuse of other acute headache medications could increase headache frequency. We reviewed published English-language papers and book chapters. Willis (1672), Oppenheim (1900), Collier (1922), Balyeat (1933), and von Storch (1937) all described chronic migraine. Lennox (1934), O'Sullivan (1936), Silfverskiöld (1947), Graham (1955), Friedman (1955), and Lippman (1955) wrote about ergotamine-overuse headache. Graham (1955), Friedman (1955), Lippman (1955), and Horton and Peters (1963) outlined withdrawal protocols. Chronic migraine has been mentioned in the literature for centuries, while medication-overuse headache has been written about for decades. Graham, Friedman, and Lippman deserve credit for separately reporting the first ergotamine withdrawal programmes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (01/02) ◽  
pp. 38-42
Author(s):  
K. Henkel

ZusammenfassungEs besteht eine hohe Komorbidität zwischen primären Kopfschmerzen und psychischen Erkrankungen. Eine gegenseitige Verstärkung und gemeinsame ätiologische Faktoren werden vermutet und wurden zum Teil nachgewiesen, so zum Beispiel bei Migräne und Depressionen. Eine nosologische Einteilung als sekundärer “Kopfschmerz zurückzuführen auf eine psychiatrische Störung“ verlangt eine hinreichende Evidenz für eine Auslösung oder wesentliche Verstärkung des Kopfschmerzes durch die psychische Erkrankung. Dieser Nachweis kann nur in Einzelfällen erfolgen. Größere systematische Untersuchungen fehlen. Die International Classification of Headache Disorders der International Headache Society erkennt auch in ihrer dritten Auflage (Beta-Version) nur die Somatisierungsstörung und die psychotische Störung als mögliche psychische Erkrankungen für die Auslösung sekundärer Kopfschmerzen an. Im Anhang der Klassifikation finden sich weitere psychische Erkrankungen, die möglicherweise sekundäre Kopfschmerzen auslösen können. Weitere prospektive und Längsschnittstudien sind nötig, um diese Zusammenhänge künftig besser beurteilen zu können.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document