Comparison of hand-to-hand bioimpedance and anthropometry equations versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of body fat percentage in 17-18-year-old conscripts

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mart Lintsi ◽  
Helje Kaarma ◽  
Ingrid Kull
Keyword(s):  
Body Fat ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
Body Fat Percentage ◽  
Fat Percentage ◽  
X Ray

CONCURRENT VALIDITY OF THE BOD POD AND DUAL ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY TECHNIQUES FOR ASSESSING THE BODY FAT PERCENTAGE IN YOUNG, WOMEN

2001 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. S16
Author(s):  
G F. Maddalozzo ◽  
B J. Cardinal ◽  
A A. Fuller ◽  
S L. Stark ◽  
S S. Levy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Fat ◽  
Young Women ◽  
Concurrent Validity ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
The Body ◽  
Body Fat Percentage ◽  
Fat Percentage ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Bod Pod

scholarly journals Comparison of 7-site skinfold measurement and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating body fat percentage and regional adiposity in Taiwanese diabetic patients

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. e0236323
Author(s):  
Feng-Chih Kuo ◽  
Chieh-Hua Lu ◽  
Li-Wei Wu ◽  
Tung-Wei Kao ◽  
Sheng-Chiang Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Fat ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Body Fat Percentage ◽  
Fat Percentage ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Skinfold Measurement ◽  
Regional Adiposity

Reference Values for Body Fat Percentage obtained from Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Adults

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 353
Author(s):  
Mary S. Tuttle ◽  
Whitney A. Welch ◽  
Ann M. Swartz ◽  
Alexander H.K. Montoye ◽  
Matthew Harber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Fat ◽  
Reference Values ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
Body Fat Percentage ◽  
Fat Percentage ◽  
X Ray

Agreement of BMI-Based Equations and DXA in Determining Body-Fat Percentage in Adults With Down Syndrome

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Esco ◽  
Brett S. Nickerson ◽  
Sara C. Bicard ◽  
Angela R. Russell ◽  
Phillip A. Bishop
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Body Fat ◽  
Constant Error ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
Body Fat Percentage ◽  
Regression Equations ◽  
Fat Percentage ◽  
Limits Of Agreement ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Significant Difference

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate measurements of body-fat percentage (BF%) in 4 body-mass-index- (BMI) -based equations and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in individuals with Down syndrome (DS). Ten male and 10 female adults with DS volunteered for this study. Four regression equations for estimating BF% based on BMI previously developed by Deurenberg et al. (DEBMI-BF%), Gallagher et al. (GABMI-BF%), Womersley & Durnin (WOBMI-BF%), and Jackson et al. (JABMI-BF%) were compared with DXA. There was no significant difference (p = .659) in mean BF% values between JABMI-BF% (BF% = 40.80% ± 6.3%) and DXA (39.90% ± 11.1%), while DEBMI-BF% (34.40% ± 9.0%), WOBMI-BF% (35.10% ± 9.4%), and GABMI-BF% (35.10% ± 9.4%) were significantly (p < .001) lower. The limits of agreement (1.96 SD of the constant error) varied from 9.80% to 16.20%. Therefore, BMI-based BF% equations should not be used in individuals with DS.

scholarly journals Body Fat Percentage Measured by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry is Associated with Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Japanese

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 41-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuyuki Miyatake ◽  
Motohiko Miyachi ◽  
Izumi Tabata ◽  
Takeyuki Numata
Keyword(s):  
Oxygen Uptake ◽  
Body Fat ◽  
Maximal Oxygen Uptake ◽  
Dual Energy ◽  
Body Fat Percentage ◽  
Fat Percentage ◽  
X Ray
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document