Agreement of BMI-Based Equations and DXA in Determining Body-Fat Percentage in Adults With Down Syndrome

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Esco ◽  
Brett S. Nickerson ◽  
Sara C. Bicard ◽  
Angela R. Russell ◽  
Phillip A. Bishop

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate measurements of body-fat percentage (BF%) in 4 body-mass-index- (BMI) -based equations and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in individuals with Down syndrome (DS). Ten male and 10 female adults with DS volunteered for this study. Four regression equations for estimating BF% based on BMI previously developed by Deurenberg et al. (DEBMI-BF%), Gallagher et al. (GABMI-BF%), Womersley & Durnin (WOBMI-BF%), and Jackson et al. (JABMI-BF%) were compared with DXA. There was no significant difference (p = .659) in mean BF% values between JABMI-BF% (BF% = 40.80% ± 6.3%) and DXA (39.90% ± 11.1%), while DEBMI-BF% (34.40% ± 9.0%), WOBMI-BF% (35.10% ± 9.4%), and GABMI-BF% (35.10% ± 9.4%) were significantly (p < .001) lower. The limits of agreement (1.96 SD of the constant error) varied from 9.80% to 16.20%. Therefore, BMI-based BF% equations should not be used in individuals with DS.

Author(s):  
Reham A. Mostafa ◽  
Doaa R. Negm ◽  
Naser A. ElSawy

Background: Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is the most accurate technique in determining fat percentage but it is unpotable, expensive, unavailable for general applicability. Objective: This study aimed to find the most accurate and easiest technique as alternative to DEXA for quick determination of body fat%. This study examined the accuracy of three models of Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) technique (Fat Loss Monitor- Body Composition -Body Fat Analyzer) in determining the body fat percentage with using DEXA as a reference standard. Subject and Methods: A cross sectional study was carried out during the period from (28-9-2017) to (5-4-2018) among a random sample of (53) volunteers female student in Umm Al Qura University from Faculty of Applied Medical Science aged between (20-39 years) from different level of education. All subjects were generally healthy, data was collected through a structured questionnaire compose of three section. Demographic data was collected and anthropometric measurements were evaluated as well as body composition (Only body fat%) using DEXA, body composition monitor, fat loss monitor and body fat analyzer. Results: BMI classification of the total 53 subjects was including 8 healthy females, 17 overfat, 25 obese and 3 underweight. The fat% result from DEXA and body fat analyzer was significant difference at (P < 0.05). Fat percent result from DEXA and Body Composition device was non-significant difference at (P>0.05). The fat% result from DEXA and Fat Loss Monitor device was significant at difference (P<0.05). Conclusion: The most accurate of BIA technique was the Body Composition device compering to DEXA.


2001 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. S16
Author(s):  
G F. Maddalozzo ◽  
B J. Cardinal ◽  
A A. Fuller ◽  
S L. Stark ◽  
S S. Levy ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. e0236323
Author(s):  
Feng-Chih Kuo ◽  
Chieh-Hua Lu ◽  
Li-Wei Wu ◽  
Tung-Wei Kao ◽  
Sheng-Chiang Su ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 353
Author(s):  
Mary S. Tuttle ◽  
Whitney A. Welch ◽  
Ann M. Swartz ◽  
Alexander H.K. Montoye ◽  
Matthew Harber ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 41-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuyuki Miyatake ◽  
Motohiko Miyachi ◽  
Izumi Tabata ◽  
Takeyuki Numata

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document