Comparison of Thoracic and Abdominal Cavity Volumes During Abdominal CO2Insufflation and Abdominal Wall Lift

2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 607-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney Watkins ◽  
Boel A. Fransson ◽  
Claude A. Ragle ◽  
John Mattoon ◽  
John M. Gay
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Abdominal Cavity ◽  
Thoracic And Abdominal

scholarly journals Comparative study of inflammatory response and adhesions formation after fixation of different meshes for inguinal hernia repair in rabbits

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 347-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Goldenberg ◽  
Jacques Matone ◽  
Wagner Marcondes ◽  
Fernando Augusto Mardiros Herbella ◽  
José Francisco de Mattos Farah
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Response ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Peritoneal Cavity ◽  
Abdominal Cavity ◽  
Mesh Fixation ◽  
Rabbit Model ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Preperitoneal Space ◽  
Similar Amount ◽  
The Right

PURPOSE: Compare, in a rabbit model, the inflammatory response and adhesions formation following surgical fixation of polypropilene and Vypro mesh in the inguinal preperitoneal space. METHODS: Fourteen male New Zealand rabbits, weighing between 2.000 to 2.500 g were used. A midline incision was made and the peritoneal cavity was exposed. The 2,0X1,0 cm polypropylene mesh was fixed in the left flank and secured to the margins with 3-0 prolene in a separate pattern. In the right flank, a 2,0X1,0 cm Vypro II mesh was sewn in the same way. After the post surgical period, the animals were again anesthetized and underwent laparoscopic approach, in order to identify and evaluate adhesions degree. Both fixed prosthesis were excised bilaterally with the abdominal wall segment, including peritoneum, aponeurosis and muscle and sent to a pathologist RESULTS: Operative time ranged from 15 to 25 minutes and no difficulties in applying the mesh were found. From the 14 polypropylene meshes fixed to the intact peritoneum, 11 had adhesions to the abdominal cavity (78,6%). Concerning Vypro mesh, 12 animals developed adhesions from the 14 with mesh fixation (85,7%). Histological examination of tissues harvested revealed fibroblasts, collagen, macrophages and lymphocytes between the threads of the mesh. CONCLUSION: Polypropylene and Vypro mesh, when implanted in the peritoneal cavity of rabbits provoke similar amount of adhesions. Vypro mesh tissues had higher fibrosis resulting in better mesh incorporation to the abdominal wall.

Metastasis of missed cholangiocarcinoma in the left lobethrough abdominal wall laparoscopic port-site and umbilicus after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: case report and literature review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesheng Huang ◽  
Hongyi Li ◽  
Jun Chen ◽  
Jinghua Jiang ◽  
Wanchun Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Malignant Tumor ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Abdominal Cavity ◽  
Left Lobe ◽  
Port Site ◽  
Laparoscopic Port ◽  
Missed Diagnosis ◽  
Upper Abdominal

Abstract Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been widely used by surgeons. However, a serious but rare condition may be happened, which is the missed diagnosis of intraperitoneal malignant tumor. If the malignancy exists, the changes of the abdominal environment or the laparoscopic operation might brought the cancer cells to the abdominal cavity or the abdominal wall. The missed laparoscopic malignant tumors are prone to metastasis, especially at the laparoscopic port-site. More extreme condition will be located in the navel, which is known as Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule(SMJN).Case presentation: A 63-year-old female who had undergone cholecystectomy and choledocholithotomy ten months ago was hospitalized for upper abdominal pain. Laboratory examination indicated that the most of tumor markers were increased. CT scan revealed that there was a diffused irregular and progressively enhanced mass around the left lobe bile duct, multiple enlarged lymph nodes in the abdominal cavity and multiple nodular lesions were found under the costal margin of the right upper abdominal wall, right lower abdominal wall and the umbilicus. Biopsy of the nodules under the original surgical scar showed an infiltrative or metastatic middle differentiated adenocarcinoma. So the diagnosis was left lobe cholangiocarcinoma of the liver, multiple lymph nodes metastasis in the abdominal cavity and multiple implant metastasis in abdominal wall laparoscopic port-site and umbilical.Conclusion: In laparoscopic cholecystectomy, surgeons should not only focus on the local lesions, like gallstone in biliary system, but also look around other the tissues and organs to avoid missing the abdominal malignant tumor or other lesions. When atypical symptoms or abnormalities have been found pre-operation, all abdominal organs should be evaluated in detail to avoid missed diagnosis of potential malignant tumors. On the other hand, when there is a nodule in the umbilicus, all the organs and tissues in abdomen should be examined to find the potential malignant tumor. Finally, multiple cholelithiasis in the left lobe of the liver should be regarded as a high risk factor for cholangiocarcinoma.

scholarly journals Limb Body Wall Complex: A Rare Anomaly

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 56-58
Author(s):  
Unan Sultana ◽  
Md Qumrul Ahsan
Keyword(s):  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Umbilical Cord ◽  
Early Pregnancy ◽  
Body Wall ◽  
Abdominal Cavity ◽  
Abdominal Wall Defects ◽  
Proper Management ◽  
Vascular Disruption ◽  
Abdominal Organs

Body stalk anomalies are a group of massively disfiguring abdominal wall defects in which the abdominal organs lie outside of the abdominal cavity in a sac of amnioperitoneum with absence of or very small umbilical cord. Various hypotheses proposed to explain the pathogenesis of limb body wall complex include early amnion disruptions, embryonic dysplasia, and vascular disruption in early pregnancy. Body stalk anomaly is an accepted fatal anomaly and, hence, its early diagnosis aids in proper management of the patient. We present a case of LBWC, exhibiting combined cranial, abdominal & limb features.Chatt Maa Shi Hosp Med Coll J; Vol.16 (2); July 2017; Page 56-58

Surgical Anatomy of the Retroperitoneal Spaces Part II: The Architecture of the Retroperitoneal Space

2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petros Mirilas ◽  
John E. Skandalakis
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Bladder ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Anterior Abdominal Wall ◽  
Anterior Part ◽  
Abdominal Cavity ◽  
Surgical Anatomy ◽  
Preperitoneal Space ◽  
Renal Fascia ◽  
Pelvic Wall ◽  
Prevesical Space

The extraperitoneal space extends between peritoneum and investing fascia of muscles of anterior, lateral and posterior abdominal and pelvic walls, and circumferentially surrounds the abdominal cavity. The retroperitoneum, which is confined to the posterior and lateral abdominal and pelvic wall, may be divided into three surgicoanatomic zones: centromedial, lateral (right and left), and pelvic. The preperitoneal space is confined to the anterior abdominal wall and the subperitoneal extraperitoneal space to the pelvis. In the extraperitoneal tissue, condensation fascias delineate peri- and parasplanchnic spaces. The former are between organs and condensation fasciae, the latter between this fascia and investing fascia of neighboring muscles of the wall. Thus, perirenal space is encircled by renal fascia, and pararenal is exterior to renal fascia. Similarly for the urinary bladder, paravesical space is between the umbilical prevesical fascia and fascia of the pelvic wall muscles—the prevesical space is its anterior part, between transversalis and umbilical prevesical fascia. For the rectum, the “mesorectum” describes the extraperitoneal tissue bound by the mesorectal condensation fascia, and the pararectal space is between the latter and the muscles of the pelvic wall. Perisplanchnic spaces are closed, except for neurovascular pedicles. Prevesical and pararectal (presacral) and posterior pararenal spaces are in the same anatomical level and communicate. Anterior to the anterior layer of the renal fascia, the anterior interfascial plane (superimposed and fused mesenteries of pancreas, duodenum, and colon) permits communication across the midline. Thus parasplanchnic extraperitoneal spaces of abdomen and pelvis communicate with each other and across the midline.

Role of the diaphragm in chest wall mechanics

1992 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 568-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Lichtenstein ◽  
S. A. Ben-Haim ◽  
G. M. Saidel ◽  
U. Dinnar
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Model ◽  
Flat Surface ◽  
Abdominal Cavity ◽  
Gastric Distension ◽  
Rib Cage ◽  
Chest Wall Mechanics ◽  
Human Experiments ◽  
General Mathematical Model ◽  
Thoracic And Abdominal

We analyzed three different assumptions about diaphragm function that determine the thoracoabdominal interaction. In the simplest case, the diaphragm is assumed to be a completely flaccid membrane serving only to partition the thorax and the abdominal cavity. In the second case, it is assumed to have a finite tension but to maintain a relatively flat surface at the base of the rib cage (i.e., a negligible zone of apposition). In the general case, it is assumed that the diaphragm has finite tension and its position may vary (i.e., permitting a zone of apposition). These possible modes of behavior are incorporated into a mathematical model of ventilatory system mechanics that distinguishes the diaphragm, lung, abdomen, and rib cage. The significance of these modes is examined with respect to data from human experiments in which gas or liquid is introduced into the pleural or abdominal spaces, causing a volume change (Vep). We show that the Vep effect on the thoracic and abdominal volumes is sensitive to diaphragm mechanics and depends on the nature of the Vep: gastric distension (with water or air) or pneumothorax. Only the behavior of the general model is consistent with physiological observations, especially the distribution of Vep. Our general mathematical model can quantitatively predict this behavior.

Desmoid-type Fibromatosis of the Mesentery: A Case Report

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-62
Author(s):  
Tatyana M. Betova ◽  
Savelina L. Popovska ◽  
Radoslav G. Trifonov ◽  
Konstantina S. Karakadieva ◽  
Genoveva B. Valcheva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Multidisciplinary Approach ◽  
Abdominal Cavity ◽  
Metastatic Potential ◽  
Surgical Method ◽  
Anatomical Position ◽  
Abdominal Organs ◽  
Mesenchymal Neoplasm

SummaryDesmoid-type fibromatosis is a rare mesenchymal neoplasm with locally aggressive, infiltrating and destructive growth that is not characterized by a metastatic potential. According to their anatomical position, desmoid-type fibromatoses can be divided into three groups: extra-abdominal, intra-abdominal, and fibromatoses of the abdominal wall. Mesenteric fibromatoses account for 8% of the intra-abdominal ones. The latter are characterized by myofibroblastic proliferation and infiltration of both the pelvic and abdominal organs. We report a 26-year-old woman who complained of abdominal enlargement, feeling of heaviness, discomfort and reflux, which symptoms dated back 1-2 months prior to hospitalization. The patient underwent laparotomy due to subocclusive symptoms. Intraoperatively, a tumor sized 30 cm in diameter was found. The tumor originated from the mesentery and infiltrated in the jejunum, the entire ileum, and part of the caecum with perforation towards the abdominal cavity. The histological and immunohistochemical examinations are important for clarification of the diagnosis. The treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach, in which the surgical method has the key role.

Entral feeding tube insertion after esophagectomy: Technique via transgastric conduit or transduodenal.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 210-210
Author(s):  
Takashi Ogata ◽  
Tetsushi Nakajima ◽  
Kazuki Kano ◽  
Yukio Maezawa ◽  
Kousuke Ikeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Internal Hernia ◽  
Gastric Tube ◽  
Abdominal Cavity ◽  
Feeding Tube ◽  
Gastric Conduit ◽  
Round Ligament ◽  
Insertion Point ◽  
Tube Insertion ◽  
Gastric Tube Reconstruction

210 Background: We always used early enteral feeding after esophagectomy as perioperative management. The common procedure for feeding tube insertion is jejunostomy, but sometimes complication such as internal hernia was occurred. In case of retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction, we usually inserted feeding tube through gastric conduit. But in case of posterior mediastinal gastric tube reconstruction, this procedure was not available because of the distance between abdominal wall and gastric tube. So we have developed the new procedure for feeding tube insertion using the mobilized round ligament of liver. Methods: The aims of the study is to clarify the safety of these procedures. In case of retrosternal reconstruction, we usually inserted feeding tube from prepylorus of gastric conduit, and feeding tube was delivered through pyloric ring to 3rd portion of duodenum(Procedure A). Insertion point of the tube was always close to abdominal wall, and easy to be guided to extra-abdomen. On the other hand, in case of posterior reconstruction, we used the new procedure as below(Procedure B). At first, the round ligament of liver was cut at the liver edge. Next, feeding tube was inserted 15~20cm from anterior wall of 2nd portion of duodenum with Witzel suture fixation. After that, feeding tube was led to outside of the abdominal wall through in the mobilized round ligament. The cut edge of round ligament was fixed to the duodenum wall with 4-point suture at tube insertion point, and finally feeding tube completely surrounded by round ligament without direct exposure to the abdominal cavity. And to prevent internal hernia, the space between abdominal wall and mobilized round ligament was covered by omental fat. Results: From January 2012 to December 2014, 126 cases were inserted by procedure A, and from June 2015 to February 2016, 35 cases were done by procedure B. There was no trouble derived from the feeding tube insertion such as intra-operative bleeding, leakage of digestive juice, infectious complication, ileus, and there was no trouble in removal at outpatients in both procedures. Conclusions: Both procedures were safe, so we can manage the feeding tube insertion route by the reconstruction route after esophagectomy.

scholarly journals Resection and Abdominal Wall Reconstruction of a Desmoid Tumor with Endometrioma Features

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaqueline Majors ◽  
Nathaniel F. Stoikes ◽  
Reza Nejati ◽  
Jeremiah L. Deneve
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumor ◽  
Abdominal Mass ◽  
Abdominal Cavity ◽  
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction ◽  
Pathologic Finding ◽  
Desmoid Tumors ◽  
History Of ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Palpable Abdominal Mass

Desmoid tumors are rare, musculoaponeurotic mesenchymal origin tumors arising from the proliferation of well-differentiated fibroblasts. Desmoid tumors may arise from any location with the abdominal cavity, abdominal wall and extremity locations being most frequent. We present the case of a 35-year-old female with a history of endometriosis who presented palpable abdominal mass and cyclic abdominal pain. Resection was performed for a presumed desmoid soft tissue tumor. Final pathology demonstrated desmoid histology admixed with abdominal wall endometriosis (endometrioma). This unique pathologic finding has only been rarely reported and is discussed with a brief review of the literature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document