scholarly journals Factor VIII requirement to maintain a target plasma level in the prophylactic treatment of severe hemophilia A: influences of variance in pharmacokinetics and treatment regimens

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. W. COLLINS ◽  
S. BJÖRKMAN ◽  
K. FISCHER ◽  
V. BLANCHETTE ◽  
M. OH ◽  
...  
1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (08) ◽  
pp. 525-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolf Ljung

IntroductionThe goal of prophylactic treatment of hemophilia is to convert the severe form of the disorder into a milder form by administration of factors VIII or IX. The rationale behind this is that chronic arthropathy, the hallmark of hemophilia after repeated bleedings, is less frequent and less severe in moderate hemophilia (i.e., factor VIII or factor IX concentrations of 1% to 4% of normal) than in severe hemophilia (i.e., factor VIII/factor IX concentrations lower than 1% of normal).1 Keep in mind, however, that prophylactic treatment also provides protection from all other forms of hemorrhage that may occur spontaneously or as a result of trivial trauma in the untreated hemophilic child. Today, prophylactic treatment is available to only a few hemophilia patients in the world, although it is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Federation of Haemophilia (WFH): “Since the main goal is to prevent joint bleeding and its sequelae, prophylaxis should be considered optimal management for persons with severe hemophilia A or B (i.e., with basal factor VIII and/or factor IX levels <1% of normal). Treatment should be started at the age of 1-2 years and be continued indefinitely. Where prophylaxis is not feasible or appropriate, on-demand therapy should be given.”2 In the United States, the Medical and Scientific Advisory Council of the National Hemophilia Foundation has recommended that “prophylaxis should be considered the optimal therapy for children with severe hemophilia A or B.”3 The aim of this chapter is to discuss prophylactic infusion regimens in the management of hemophilia.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Humphries ◽  
Stephan Rauchensteiner ◽  
Claudia Tückmantel ◽  
Alexander Pieper ◽  
Monika Maas Enriquez ◽  
...  

Objectives. Prophylaxis regimens for severe hemophilia A allowing more flexible dosing while maintaining efficacy may improve adherence and decrease the cost of prophylaxis. Here, we compared the clinical effectiveness of once- or twice-weekly versus ≥3-times-weekly prophylaxis with sucrose-formulated recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII-FS) in a “real-world” practice setting.Methods. Data from 3 postmarketing studies were pooled. Patients with severe hemophilia A receiving ≥1 prophylaxis infusion/wk of rFVIII-FS for ≥80% of a prophylaxis observation period (≥5 months) were included. Patients were categorized based on physician-assigned treatment regimens of 1-2 prophylaxis injections/wk (n=63) or ≥3 prophylaxis injections/wk (n=76). Descriptive statistics were determined for annualized bleeding rates (ABRs).Results. Median (quartile 1; quartile 3) ABR for all bleeds was 2.0 (0; 4.0) in the 1-2 prophylaxis injections/wk group and 3.9 (1.5; 9.3) in the ≥3 prophylaxis injections/wk group. Median ABRs for joint, spontaneous, and trauma-related bleeds were numerically lower with 1-2 prophylaxis injections/wk. As an estimate of prophylaxis success, 63% (≥3 prophylaxis injections/wk) to 84% of patients (1-2 prophylaxis injections/wk) had ≤4 annualized joint bleeds.Conclusions. Dosing flexibility and successful prophylaxis with rFVIII-FS were demonstrated. Very good bleeding control was achieved with both once-twice-weekly and ≥3-times-weekly prophylaxis dosing regimens.


2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 413-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. W. COLLINS ◽  
V. S. BLANCHETTE ◽  
K. FISCHER ◽  
S. BJÖRKMAN ◽  
M. OH ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol Volume 7 ◽  
pp. 129-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nanxin Li ◽  
Jennifer Pocoski ◽  
Rajeev Ayyagari ◽  
Nikki Church ◽  
Monika Maas Enriquez ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (01) ◽  
pp. 017-022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia T Singer ◽  
Joseph E Addiego ◽  
Donald C Reason ◽  
Alexander H Lucas

SummaryIn this study we sought to determine whether factor VUI-reactive T lymphocytes were present in hemophilia A patients with inhibitor antibodies. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (MNC) were obtained from 12 severe hemophilia A patients having high titer inhibitors, 4 severe hemophilia A patients without inhibitors and 5 normal male subjects. B cell-depleted MNC were cultured in serum-free medium in the absence or presence of 2 µg of recombinant human factor VIII (rFVIII) per ml, and cellular proliferation was assessed after 5 days of culture by measuring 3H-thymidine incorporation. rFVIII induced marked cellular proliferation in cultures of 4 of 12 inhibitor-positive hemophilia patients: fold increase over background (stimulation index, SI) of 7.8 to 23.3. The remaining 8 inhibitor-positive patients, the 4 hemophilia patients without inhibitors and the 5 normal subjects, all had lower proliferative responses to rFVIII, SI range = 1.6 to 6.0. As a group, the inhibitor-positive subjects had significantly higher proliferative responses to rFVIII than did the inhibitor-negative and normal subjects (p < 0.05 by t-test). Cell fractionation experiments showed that T lymphocytes were the rFVIII-responsive cell type, and that monocytes were required for T cell proliferation. Thus, rFVIII-reactive T lymphocytes are present in the peripheral circulation of some inhibitor-positive hemophilia A patients. These T cells may recognize FVIII in an antigen-specific manner and play a central role in the regulation of inhibitor antibody production


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (23) ◽  
pp. 6367-6370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles R.M. Hay ◽  
Ben Palmer ◽  
Elizabeth Chalmers ◽  
Ri Liesner ◽  
Rhona Maclean ◽  
...  

Abstract The age-adjusted incidence of new factor VIII inhibitors was analyzed in all United Kingdom patients with severe hemophilia A between 1990 and 2009. Three hundred fifteen new inhibitors were reported to the National Hemophilia Database in 2528 patients with severe hemophilia who were followed up for a median (interquartile range) of 12 (4-19) years. One hundred sixty (51%) of these arose in patients ≥ 5 years of age after a median (interquartile range) of 6 (4-11) years' follow-up. The incidence of new inhibitors was 64.29 per 1000 treatment-years in patients < 5 years of age and 5.31 per 1000 treatment-years at age 10-49 years, rising significantly (P = .01) to 10.49 per 1000 treatment-years in patients more than 60 years of age. Factor VIII inhibitors arise in patients with hemophilia A throughout life with a bimodal risk, being greatest in early childhood and in old age. HIV was associated with significantly fewer new inhibitors. The inhibitor incidence rate ratio in HIV-seropositive patients was 0.32 times that observed in HIV-seronegative patients (P < .001). Further study is required to explore the natural history of later-onset factor VIII inhibitors and to investigate other potential risk factors for inhibitor development in previously treated patients.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 431-436
Author(s):  
Lawrence J. Wolff ◽  
Everett W. Lovrien

Nine patients with hemophilia A suffered 16 fractures. Four patients had severe hemophilia (factor VIII &lt; 1%) and five had moderate or mild hemophilia (factor VIII between 4% and 25%). Two patients developed skeletal pseudotumors after their fractures. One patient developed neurapraxia. Fractures in hemophiliacs should be treated promptly with 25 units/kg/day of factors. Fractures of the upper limb should be maintained at this dose for seven days; lower extremity fractures should be treated with factor for 14 days. Orthopedic management should be the same as used for nonhemophiliacs. Skeletal pseudotumors should be managed with prolonged factor administration and immobilization until radiographic evidence of healing occurs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document