The Prognostic Significance of Visible Infarction on Computed Tomography Following Lacunar Stroke: Results of a Long-Term Follow-Up Study

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. R. Walters ◽  
C. J. Weir ◽  
F. G. Adams ◽  
K. R. Lees
2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. 735-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Pancherz ◽  
Hanna Salé ◽  
Krister Bjerklin

ABSTRACT Objective:  To analyze radiographic signs of temperomandibular joint (TMJ) osteoarthritis and clinical TMJ symptoms in patients 6 years and 32 years after treatment with a Herbst appliance. Materials and Methods:  Fourteen patients were derived from a sample of 22 with Class II division 1 malocclusions consecutively treated with a banded Herbst appliance at the age of 12–14 years old (T1-T2). The subjects were reexamined after therapy at the ages of 20 years (T3) and 46 years (T4). The TMJs of the 14 patients were analyzed radiographically (conventional lateral tomography at T3 and cone-beam computed tomography at T4) and clinically/anamnestically at T3 and T4. Results:  Six years after Herbst therapy, signs of osteoarthritis were seen in one patient. At the 32-year follow-up, two additional patients had developed signs of osteoarthritis. At the 6-year follow-up, TMJ clicking was present in two patients, though none of the patients reported TMJ pain. At the 32-year follow-up, six patients had TMJ clicking and one patient had TMJ pain. Conclusions:  This longitudinal very-long-term follow-up study after Herbst therapy revealed only minor problems from the TMJ. The TMJ findings 6 years and 32 years after Herbst treatment corresponded to those in the general population. Thus, in the very long term, the Herbst appliance does not appear to be harmful to the TMJ.


1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaaki Tachibana ◽  
Ayako Miyakawa ◽  
Michiko Miyakawa ◽  
Shiro Saito ◽  
Kaoru Nakamura ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document