scholarly journals Association of Drug Therapy with Survival in Cardiac Arrest: Limited Role of Advanced Cardiac Life Support Drugs

1995 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian G. Stiell ◽  
George A. Wells ◽  
Paul C. Hebert ◽  
Andreas Laupacis ◽  
Brian N. Weitzman
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan A. Paul ◽  
Oliver P. F. Panzer

This review explains the role of point-of-care ultrasound in cardiac arrest rhythm classification and the diagnosis of reversible causes, discusses available protocols for the application of ultrasound to Advanced Cardiac Life Support, and summarizes principles for its safe implementation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-158
Author(s):  
Agus Sukarwan ◽  
Yuly Peristiowati ◽  
Agusta D. Ellina

Cardiac arrest can occur anywhere in the hospital area, whether it is in the emergency room, patients who are already in care, outpatients, the patient's family, visitors, or the community of the hospital at work. The literature of the review aims to determine the role of emergency nurses in the administration of pulmonary heart resuscitation in cardiac arrest patients. Literature review through several stages, namely making questions, identification, eligibility, selection of article inclusion, and screening. The Selection Process is listed in the framework of the review literature and obtained the results of article 8 articles. The data showed similar results related to the role of nurses in assisting cardiac arrest patients in hospitals. The results of the article in the review focused on the role of nurses in providing life support to patients with cardiac arrest, almost from all articles reviewed discussing the knowledge, experience, and skills of nurses in providing CPR. The role of nurses in the emergency room in providing life support to cardiac arrest patients is to improve the knowledge, experience, and skills in performing CPR. One way to improve the knowledge, experience, and skills of nurses in providing CPR to cardiac arrest patients is to participate in various training such as Basic Trauma Cardiac Life Support (BTCLS) or Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ATCLS).


Resuscitation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 ◽  
pp. 159-160
Author(s):  
Michael M. Beyea ◽  
Bourke W. Tillmann ◽  
A. Dave Nagpal

Author(s):  
Mark S. Link ◽  
Mark Estes III

Resuscitation on the playing field is at least as important as screening in the prevention of death. Even if a screening strategy is largely effective, individuals will suffer sudden cardiac arrests. Timely recognition of a cardiac arrest with rapid implementation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and deployment and use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) will save lives. Basic life support, including CPR and AED use, should be a requirement for all those involved in sports, including athletes. An emergency action plan is important in order to render advanced cardiac life support and arrange for transport to medical centres.


1997 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H Burton ◽  
Mark Mass ◽  
James J Menegazzi ◽  
Donald M Yealy

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 121-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ra Charles ◽  
F Lateef ◽  
V Anantharaman

Introduction The concept of the chain of survival is widely accepted. The four links viz. early access, early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), early defibrillation and early Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) are related to survival after pre-hospital cardiac arrest. Owing to the dismal survival-to-discharge figures locally, we conducted this study to identify any weaknesses in the chain, looking in particular at bystander CPR rates and times to Basic Cardiac Life Support (BCLS) and ACLS. Methods and materials A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Emergency Department of an urban tertiary 1500-bed hospital. Over a 12-month period, all cases of non-trauma out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were evaluated. Results A total of 142 cases of non-trauma out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were identified; the majority being Chinese (103/142, 72.5%) and male (71.8%) with a mean age of 64.3±7.8 years (range 23–89 yrs). Most patients (111/142, 78.2%) did not receive any form of life support until arrival of the ambulance crew. Mean time from collapse to arrival of the ambulance crew and initiation of BCLS and defibrillation was 9.2±3.5 minutes. Mean time from collapse to arrival in the Emergency Department (and thus ACLS) was 16.8±7.1 minutes. Three patients (2.11%) survived to discharge. Conclusion There is a need to (i) facilitate layperson training in bystander CPR, and (ii) enhance paramedic training to include ACLS, in order to improve the current dismal survival outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Singapore.


2020 ◽  
pp. 088506662090680
Author(s):  
Natalie Achamallah ◽  
Jeffrey Fried ◽  
Rebecca Love ◽  
Yuri Matusov ◽  
Rohit Sharma

Introduction: Absence of pupillary light reflex (PLR) is a well-studied indicator of poor neurologic recovery after cardiac arrest. Interpretation of absent PLR is difficult in patients with hypothermia or hypotension, or who have electrolyte or acid-base disturbances. Additionally, many studies exclude patients who receive epinephrine or atropine from their analysis on the basis that these drugs are thought to abolish the PLR. This observational cohort study assessed for presence or absence of PLR in in-hospital cardiac arrest patients who received epinephrine with or without atropine during advanced cardiac life support and achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Methods: Pupil size and reactivity were assessed in adult patients who had an in-hospital cardiac arrest, received epinephrine with or without atropine, and achieved ROSC. Measurements were taken using a NeurOptics NPi-200 infrared pupillometer. Results: Forty patients had pupillometry performed within 1 hour (median: 6 minutes) after ROSC. Of these only 1 (2.5%) patient had nonreactive pupils at first measurement after ROSC. The remaining 39 (97.5%) had reactive pupils. Of the 19 patients who had pupils checked within 3 minutes of ROSC, 100% had reactive pupils. Degree of pupil responsiveness was not correlated with cumulative dose of epinephrine. Ten patients received atropine in addition to epinephrine, including the sole patient with nonreactive pupils. The remaining 9 (90%) had reactive pupils. Conclusion: Epinephrine and atropine do not abolish the PLR in patients who achieve ROSC after in-hospital cardiac arrest. Lack of pupillary response in the post-arrest patient should not be attributed to these drugs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document