Cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular reactivity capacity in patients with bilateral high-grade carotid artery stenosis

1996 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 90-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hon-Man Liu ◽  
Yong-Kwang Tu ◽  
Ping-Keung Yip ◽  
Cheng-Tau Su
2021 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 1711
Author(s):  
Efdal Akkaya ◽  
Bijen Nazliel ◽  
HaleZeynep Caglayan Batur ◽  
Erhan Ilgit ◽  
Baran Onal ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 875-881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nolan S. Hartkamp ◽  
Reinoud P. H. Bokkers ◽  
H. Bart van der Worp ◽  
M. J. P. van Osch ◽  
L. Jaap Kappelle ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 22-26
Author(s):  
Ling Yao ◽  
Jing Yi ◽  
Lixin Xu ◽  
Jun Wen ◽  
Siwei Que

Objective: To explore the clinical value of carotid artery stent implantation (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the treatment of patients with severe internal carotid artery stenosis. Methods: 88 patients with severe carotid artery stenosis who underwent CAS and CEA in the First People’s Hospital of Changde City (hereafter referred as “our hospital”) from January 2018 to December 2020 were selected as the research objects and divided into CAS group (n = 43) and CEA group (n = 45). To understand the clinical application value and feasibility of the two surgical schemes by comparing the general situation, cerebral blood flow, MMSE scale, MOCA scale score and serum miR-145, IGF1R levels of the two surgical schemes. Conclusions: CAS and CEA in the treatment of patients with severe internal carotid artery stenosis, have good curative effect, can effectively improve the patient's cerebral blood flow, regulate serum miR-145, IGF1R levels, promote the recovery of cognitive function, but relatively speaking, the incidence of stroke and hypotension after CAS is higher, and the incidence of hypertension after CEA is higher.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 117-118
Author(s):  
Vicki Gray ◽  
Sarasijhaa Desikan ◽  
Amir Khan ◽  
Dawn Barth ◽  
Siddhartha Sikdar ◽  
...  

Abstract Balance and mobility function worsen with age, and more so for those with underlying diseases. Our research has demonstrated that asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS) is associated with worse balance and mobility, and a higher fall risk, compared to older adults with similar comorbidities, but without ACAS. Thus, ACAS, with attendant blood flow-restriction to the brain is a potentially modifiable risk factor for balance and mobility dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of restoring blood flow to the brain by carotid revascularization, on balance and mobility in patients with high-grade ACAS (≥70% diameter-reducing stenosis). Twenty adults (67.0±9.4 years) undergoing carotid revascularization for high-grade stenosis were enrolled. A balance and mobility assessment was performed before- and six weeks- after carotid revascularization and included: Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Four Square Step Test (FSST), Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) Timed Up and Go (TUG), gait speed, MiniBESTest, and Walk While Talk (WWT) test. Paired t-tests assessed changes in outcome measures between the two-time points. Significant improvements were observed in measures that combined walking with dynamic movements, DGI (P=0.003), and MiniBESTest (P=0.021). Pearson’s correlations examined the relationship between balance and mobility before surgery and change score after surgery. Patients with lower baseline DGI and MiniBest scores demonstrated the most improvement on follow-up testing (r=-0.70, p=0.001, and r=-0.59, p=0.006, respectively). In conclusion, revascularization of a carotid artery stenosis improves balance and mobility; the greatest improvements are observed in those patients that are the most impaired.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document